<<Cuba has exiled a huge number of gusanos. >>
Socialism is not for everyone. For those who think that they can do better as individuals in a war of each against all, the U.S.A. is a perfect fit. Somebody should check up on these gusanos every ten years to see how they did. Some did become wealthy and for them, with values like theirs (selfishness and greed,) moving to the U.S.A. was definitely the right move. Since everyone can't get rich (who would wash their cars if they did?) I think most of the gusanos made the wrong choice, although some may undoubtedly feel good about having made the choice and taken their best shot at it.
<<If I were Cuban I would start thinking that gusano ment intelligent or ment couragious .>>
What if it did? There are plenty of intelligent and courageous men and women who supported the Revolution, and NONE of them were motivated by greed or selfishness.
<<If the US were to exile so many it would be like emptying California into Canada , how is this a good idea?>>
What's the difference? If you are building a society based on the ethic of cooperation, collective effort and sharing, and you lose a bunch of greed-driven, selfish narcissists, who gives a shit? The Revolution is better off without them, and it's cheaper than shooting them.
<<The Cuban system deserves the description "primitive" because it has no advantages over a benevolent monarchy .>>
Funny, that's a question I've often asked myself - - what's the difference between Fidel and a more-or-less benevolent monarch? Elections would probably be better IF. If you had an intelligent, well-informed electorate and no special interests were allowed to interfere in the elections with dirty tricks, lies, false promises, etc. Given the example of the U.S. federal elections, I'd say that they are no match for a benevolent monarchy, despite the succession problems of the monarch.
<<There are lots of countrys with more advanced systems , systems that do not make their minoritys endure abuse , insult and exile. These are problems that have been historicly solved, there is no need of invention.>>
Nothing's been "historically solved" - - the U.S.-style phony elections between Tweedle-Dum and Tweedle-Dee candidates only serve to mask the problem of rule by special interests. Elections in general were better in 4th-Century Athens than in the U.S.A. and might still work in small communities where everyone knows everyone else. They sure as hell have huge problems in a country of 300 million where dozens of millions of dollars are required even for a Senatorial campaign, let alone a Presidential. Don't pretend that you have solved your problems while the Communists haven't solved theirs. That's bullshit.
