DebateGate

General Category => 3DHS => Topic started by: hnumpah on September 21, 2006, 08:25:26 PM

Title: Agreement reached on interrogations
Post by: hnumpah on September 21, 2006, 08:25:26 PM
(http://cagle.msnbc.com/working/060920/huffaker.gif)
Title: Re: Agreement reached on interrogations
Post by: Lanya on September 22, 2006, 02:47:53 AM
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/22/opinion/22fri1.html?_r=1&hp=&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print

http://balkin.blogspot.com/2006/09/senators-snatch-defeat-from-jaws-of.html

Senators Snatch Defeat From Jaws of Victory: U.S. to be First Nation to Authorize Violations of Geneva

Marty Lederman

I hope that that headline is a gross exaggeration, but based on a few quick seconds purusing the "compromise," I'm afraid it's not. [The Administration appears to agree. Stephen Hadley was crowing to reporters within minutes that the bill would authorize the CIA "program" to "go forward." And a "senior administration official" -- apparently Dan Bartlett -- told the Washington Post "that Bush essentially got what he asked for in a different formulation that allows both sides to maintain their concerns were addressed. 'We kind of take the scenic route, but we get there,' the official said."] [NOTE: I will be updating this post as we learn more, and if I have any time to parse the language more closely. I would dearly love if my initial impression -- and Hadley's -- is proven to be dead wrong. So I sincerely invite folks from the Senate staffs and elsewhere to write in with comments and corrections. [...........]
Title: Re: Agreement reached on interrogations
Post by: Amianthus on September 22, 2006, 08:59:55 AM
(http://www.dontfeedthetroll.de/images/dftt.gif)