Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - R.R.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 16
61
3DHS / Obama made a war decision based on a mag with this cover
« on: July 01, 2010, 12:12:46 AM »


Obama is a jackass and a moron.

I saw this magazine at Walmart. It was fully stocked. Not one issue was sold. All ten issues were pressed firmly untouched against the display case. I thumbed through it and put it back neatly.

That is Lady Gaga's ass hanging out there. Obama made a life or death decision based upon a magazine with this cover. He is not somebody who should be taken seriously. He had no experience for this job and now we are all paying for it. We are looking at a 10% unemployment rate indefinitely, an unending spewing of oil on the gulf coast, and a deteriorating condition in Afghanstain because of his lack of experience.

Obama hired this general, put him in charge of the mission, and then fired him over some comments that were supposed to be off the record. Anybody who would make a decision of this magnitude about our boys in harm's way based on this magazine needs to have his head examined.

62
Portland police will investigate accusations that Al Gore groped woman

Portland police announced today that it will re-open and investigate a Portland massage therapist?s allegations that former Vice President Al Gore sexually assaulted her at a downtown hotel in October 2006.

The announcement comes as the therapist went public for the first time, telling the National Enquirer that she demanded a full police investigation of her complaint.


Molly Hagerty is photographed in the latest edition of the National Enquirer, holding the black pants she wore that night. She?s quoted saying she paid for a DNA analysis of a stain on the pants. The paper also mentioned videotape footage from the Hotel Lucia, where the encounter occurred, and named a computer consultant who told the tabloid that Hagerty called him at about 4 a.m. Oct. 24, 2006, and told her immediately about details of the attack.

Portland police said last week they considered the case closed unless new evidence surfaced. Police did not explain their decision today.

"Consistent with our policy regarding open investigations, the Police Bureau will not be commenting on any additional specifics regarding this case at this time,'' Portland Det. Mary Wheat, bureau spokeswoman, said in a news release.

Hagerty first filed a complaint through her attorney two months after the 2006 encounter, but then refused to meet with detectives on three occasions. Then in January 2009, she presented a detailed statement to Portland sexual assault investigators.

She told investigators that Gore groped her, kissed her and made unwanted sexual advances during a late-night massage session in a suite at the upscale Hotel Lucia. She said she told two friends and kept the clothes she wore that night, including her black pants with stains on them. But Portland police didn?t contact any of the woman?s friends, obtain the potential evidence or interview anyone at the hotel, records show.

"The case was not investigated any further because detectives concluded there was insufficient evidence to support the allegations," the Portland Police Bureau said in a prepared statement last week.

The Oregonian generally does not name people who report sexual assaults, but is naming Hagerty because she has made her allegations public.

Today, the district attorney?s office said it had no further comment, but stands by its statement issued last week. In that, Multnomah County District Attorney Michael Schrunk said: "If the complainant and the Portland Police Bureau wish to pursue the possibility of a criminal prosecution, additional investigation by the Bureau will be necessary and will be discussed with the Portland Police Bureau."

http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/06/portland_police_will_reopen_al.html

63
3DHS / Dishonest - Vote NO or Filibuster
« on: June 30, 2010, 04:51:27 PM »
Slick Elena? Kagan evades questions on abortion memo
By: Byron York
Chief Political Correspondent
06/30/10 12:50 PM EDT


Before the Senate Judiciary Committee a short time ago, Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan appeared reluctant to admit that she wrote a 1996 Clinton White House memo aimed at altering a key medical group?s opinion of whether partial birth abortion is medically necessary.  The memo, reported yesterday by National Review, has caused a stir in conservative circles because it appeared that Kagan, then a White House policy aide, put words in the medical group?s mouth in order to soften its position on the controversial procedure. But when Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch brought the subject up with Kagan, he had a hard time getting her to admit that she did, in fact, write the document in question.

?Did you write that memo?? Hatch asked.

?Senator, with respect,? Kagan began, ?I don?t think that that?s what happened ? ?

?Did you write that memo??

?I?m sorry ? the memo which is??

?The memo that caused them to go back to the language of ?medically necessary,? which was the big issue to begin with ? ?

?Yes, well, I?ve seen the document ? ?

?But did you write it??

?The document is certainly in my handwriting.?

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/slick-elena-kagan-evades-questions-on-abortion-memo-97490439.html

-------------------

In my handwriting? What a liar. How about a simple yes or no? What is the meaning of is? She is dishonest. Vote her down.

64
3DHS / Black Republican to make history
« on: June 23, 2010, 02:31:09 AM »


S.C.: Scott Wins, Likely To Make History

State Rep. Tim Scott (R) appears well on his way to becoming the first black Republican to serve in Congress since former Rep. J.C. Watts (Okla.) left in 2002.

With over 85 percent reporting the Associated Press called the GOP runoff in South Carolina's 1st district for Scott. He lead Charleston County Councilman Paul Thurmond 69 percent to 31 percent.

Scott will now be favored to win the heavily Republican Charleston-based district in November and national Republicans are openly excited about the prospect of adding some diversity to the party's Congressional delegation.

Scott, dropped his lieutenant governors bid earlier this year to run in the 1st district after Rep. Henry Brown (R) announced his plans to retire at the end of his term.

In a race in which he was running against the son of legendary GOP Sen. Strom Thurmond (R) and the son of former South Carolina Gov. Carroll Campbell he entered the contest with a bit of name identification disadvantage. But Scott earned an early endorsement from the powerful anti-tax group the Club for Growth and soon became a favorite of national party leaders including House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (Va.) and National Republican Congressional Committee Vice Chairman Kevin McCarthy (Calif.).

Scott came in first in the nine-way primary in the 1st district on June 8 by finishing 16 percent ahead of Thurmond.

In the short sprint to the runoff Thurmond was endorsed by a handful of the other primary candidates, including third-place finisher Carroll Campbell III. But Scott's list of big name endorsements quickly expanded.

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) announced his endorsement of Scott as did Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R).

http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/eyeon2010/2010/06/sc-scott-likely-to-make-histor.html

65
3DHS / Obama's Thuggery Is Useless in Fighting Spill
« on: June 22, 2010, 10:32:46 AM »


Michael Barone

Obama?s Thuggery Is Useless in Fighting Spill


Thuggery is unattractive, ineffective thuggery even more so. Which may be one reason so many Americans have been reacting negatively to the response of Pres. Barack Obama and his administration to BP?s gulf oil spill.

Take Interior Secretary Ken Salazar?s remark that he would keep his ?boot on the neck? of BP, which brings to mind George Orwell?s definition of totalitarianism as ?a boot stamping on a human face ? forever.? Except that Salazar?s boot hasn?t gotten much in the way of results yet.

Or consider Obama?s undoubtedly carefully considered statement to Matt Lauer that he was consulting with experts ?so I know whose ass to kick.? Attacking others is a standard campaign tactic when you?re in political trouble, and certainly BP, which appears to have taken unwise shortcuts in the gulf, is an attractive target. But you don?t always win arguments that way: The Obama White House gleefully took on Dick Cheney on the issue of terrorist interrogations, but turned out that more Americans agreed with Cheney?s stand, despite his low poll numbers, than Obama?s.

Then there is Obama?s decision to impose a six-month moratorium on deepwater oil drilling in the gulf. This penalizes companies with better safety records than BP?s and will result in many advanced drilling rigs being sent to offshore oil fields abroad.

The justification offered was an Interior Department report supposedly ?peer reviewed? by ?experts identified by the National Academy of Engineering.? But it turns out the drafts the experts saw didn?t include any recommendation for a moratorium. Eight of the cited experts have said they oppose the moratorium as more economically devastating than the oil spill and counterproductive to safety.

This was blatant dishonesty by the administration, on an Orwellian scale. And it?s dishonesty in defense of a policy that has all the earmarks of mindless panic, that penalizes firms and individuals guilty of no wrongdoing, and that will worsen rather than improve our energy situation. Ineffective thuggery.

And what about the decision not to waive the Jones Act, which bars foreign-flag vessels from coming to the aid of the gulf cleanup effort? The Bush administration promptly waived it after Katrina in 2005. The Obama administration hasn?t and claims unconvincingly that, gee, there aren?t really any foreign vessels that could help. The more plausible explanation is that this refusal is a sop to the maritime unions, part of the labor movement that gave Obama and other Democrats $400 million in the 2008 campaign cycle. It?s the Chicago way: Dance with the girl that brung ya.

Or the decision to deny Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal?s proposal to deploy barges to skim oil from the gulf?s surface. Can?t do that until we see if they?ve got enough life preservers and fire equipment on board. That inspired blogger Rand Simberg to write a post he dated June 1, 1940: ?The evacuation of British and French troops from the besieged French city of Dunkirk was halted today, over concerns that many of the private vessels that had been deployed for the task were unsafe for troop transport.?

Finally, there?s the $20 billion escrow fund that Obama pried out of the BP treasury at the White House when he talked for the first time, 57 days after the rig exploded, with BP chairman Tony Hayward. It?s pleasing to think that those injured by BP will be paid off speedily, but House Republican Joe Barton had a point, though an impolitic one, when he called this a ?shakedown.?

There already are laws in place to ensure that BP will be held responsible for damages, and the company has said it will comply. So what we have is government transferring property from one party, an admittedly unattractive one, to others, not based on preexisting laws but on decisions by one man, pay czar Kenneth Feinberg.

Feinberg gets good reviews from everyone. But the Constitution does not command ?no person  . . . shall . . . be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law ? except by the decision of a person as wise and capable as Kenneth Feinberg.? The Framers stopped at ?due process of law.?

Obama doesn?t. ?If he sees any impropriety in politicians ordering executives about, upstaging the courts and threatening confiscation, he has not said so,? write the editors of The Economist, who then suggest that markets see Obama as ?an American version of Vladimir Putin.? Except that Putin is an effective thug.

? Michael Barone is senior political analyst for the Washington Examiner.

http://article.nationalreview.com/436797/obamas-thuggery-is-useless-in-fighting-spill/michael-barone

66
3DHS / Oil and Snake Oil, and XO bought it
« on: June 17, 2010, 02:46:10 AM »


Oil and Snake Oil

By Thomas Sowell

The big oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is bad enough in itself. But politics can make anything worse.

Let's stop and think. Either the government knows how to stop the oil spill or they don't. If they know how to stop it, then why have they let thousands of barrels of oil per day keep gushing out, for weeks on end? All they have to do is tell BP to step aside, while the government comes in to do it right.

If they don't know, then what is all this political grandstanding about keeping their boot on the neck of BP, the Attorney General of the United States going down to the Gulf to threaten lawsuits? on what charges was unspecified? and President Obama showing up in his shirt sleeves?

Just what is Obama going to do in his shirt sleeves, except impress the gullible? He might as well have shown up in a tuxedo with white tie, for all the difference it makes.

This government is not about governing. It is about creating an impression. That worked on the campaign trail in 2008, but it is a disaster in the White House, where rhetoric is no substitute for reality.

If the Obama administration was for real, and trying to help get the oil spill contained as soon as possible, the last thing its Attorney General would be doing is threatening a lawsuit. A lawsuit is not going to stop the oil, and creating a distraction can only make people at BP start directing their attention toward covering themselves, instead of covering the oil well.

If and when the Attorney General finds that BP did something illegal, that will be time enough to start a lawsuit. But making a public announcement at this time accomplishes absolutely nothing substantive. It is just more political grandstanding.

This is not about oil. This is about snake oil.

Nothing will keep a man or an institution determined to continue on a failing policy course like past success with that policy. Obama's political success in the 2008 election campaign was a spectacular triumph of creating images and impressions.

But creating political impressions and images is not the same thing as governing. Yet Obama in the White House keeps on saying and doing things to impress people, instead of governing.

Once the elections were over and the time for governing began, there was now a new audience to consider? a much more savvy audience, the leaders of other countries around the world.

However impressed the media and the Obama cult might be with the President's image, rhetoric and style, leaders of other countries? allies and enemies alike? are interested in results.

Even our domestic policies can affect foreign leaders, as Ronald Reagan's breaking of the air traffic controllers' strike impressed the Russians with what kind of man they were going to have to deal with, as former Soviet officials said publicly many years later.

By the same token, domestic bungling by Barack Obama sends a dangerous signal to countries hostile to us, in addition to the signal sent by his displays of amateurism on the world stage.

President Obama had barely settled into the White House before he began demonstrating his willingness to sell out this country's friends to appease our enemies. His trip to Moscow to try to make a deal with the Russians, based on reneging on the pre-existing American commitment to put a missile shield in Eastern Europe, was the kind of short-sighted betrayal whose consequences can come back to haunt a nation for years.

Obama spoke grandly about "pressing the reset button" on international relations, as if all the international commitments of the past were his to disregard.

But if no American commitment can be depended upon beyond a current administration, then any nation that allies itself with us is jeopardizing its own national security, because dangers in the international jungle last longer than 4 years or even 8 years.

We are already seeing the consequences. Even Turkey? formally a NATO ally? is cozying up to Iran, now that it is painfully clear that Obama is not going to do anything that has any realistic chance of stopping Iran from going nuclear.

If leaders of other nations can't depend on the United States, then they need to make the best deal they can with our enemies. They understand that preserving their nation's security is a leader's top priority, even if Barack Obama doesn't.

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell061510.php3

67
3DHS / The Obamas star in 1993 rap video Whoomp there it is
« on: June 07, 2010, 11:50:23 PM »
Michelle is at 47 seconds and Barack is at 1.00 minute of the video.

Whoomp There It Is - Tag Team

68
3DHS / Did you plug the hole yet, daddy?
« on: May 27, 2010, 11:42:12 PM »
No sorry kiddo, he hasn't. He really hasn't done much of anything for 36 days. He's been sitting on the sidelines.

69
3DHS / Caught
« on: May 26, 2010, 12:52:48 PM »

70
3DHS / Bombshell: Blumenthal lied about serving in Vietnam
« on: May 18, 2010, 12:33:50 AM »
Holy shit!

Candidate?s Words on Vietnam Service Differ From History

By RAYMOND HERNANDEZ
Published: May 17, 2010

At a ceremony honoring veterans and senior citizens who sent presents to soldiers overseas, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut rose and spoke of an earlier time in his life.

?We have learned something important since the days that I served in Vietnam,? Mr. Blumenthal said to the group gathered in Norwalk in March 2008. ?And you exemplify it. Whatever we think about the war, whatever we call it ? Afghanistan or Iraq ? we owe our military men and women unconditional support.?

There was one problem: Mr. Blumenthal, a Democrat now running for the United States Senate, never served in Vietnam. He obtained at least five military deferments from 1965 to 1970 and took repeated steps that enabled him to avoid going to war, according to records.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/18/nyregion/18blumenthal.html

71
3DHS / Sad: GM paid back bailout money with other bailout money
« on: April 23, 2010, 10:56:27 AM »
Grassley Slams GM, Administration Over Loans Repaid With Bailout Money

FOXNews.com

A top Senate Republican on Thursday accused the administration of misleading taxpayers about General Motors' loan repayment, saying the struggling auto giant was only able to repay its bailout money by dipping into a separate pot of bailout money.

A top Senate Republican on Thursday accused the Obama administration of misleading taxpayers about General Motors' loan repayment, saying the struggling auto giant was only able to repay its bailout money by dipping into a separate pot of bailout money.

Sen. Chuck Grassley's charge was backed up by the inspector general for the bailout -- also known as the Trouble Asset Relief Program, or TARP. Watchdog Neil Barofsky told Fox News, as well as the Senate Finance Committee, that General Motors used bailout money to pay back the federal government.

"It appears to be nothing more than an elaborate TARP money shuffle," Grassley, the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, said in a letter Thursday to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.

GM announced Wednesday that it had paid back the $8.1 billion in loans it received from the U.S. and Canadian governments. Of that, $6.7 billion went to the U.S. treasury.

But Grassley said in his letter that a Securities and Exchange Commission form filed by GM showed that $6.7 billion of the tens of billions the company received was sitting in an escrow account and available to be used for repayment. He called on Geithner to provide more information about why the company was allowed to use bailout money to repay bailout money, and how much of the remaining escrow money GM would be allowed to keep.

"The bottom line seems to be that the TARP loans were 'repaid' with other TARP funds in a Treasury escrow account. The TARP loans were not repaid from money GM is earning selling cars, as GM and the administration have claimed in their speeches, press releases and television commercials," he wrote.

Vice President Biden on Wednesday called the GM repayment a "huge accomplishment."

But Barofsky told Fox News that while it's "somewhat good news," there's a big catch. 

"I think the one thing that a lot of people overlook with this is where they got the money to pay back the loan. And it isn't from earnings. ... It's actually from another pool of TARP money that they've already received," he said Wednesday. "I don't think we should exaggerate it too much. Remember that the source of this money is just other TARP money."

Barofsky told the Senate Finance Committee the same thing Tuesday, and said the main way for the federal government to earn money out of GM would be through "a liquidation of its ownership interest."

Grassley criticized this scenario in his letter.

"The taxpayers are still on the hook, and whether TARP funds are ultimately recovered depends entirely on the government's ability to sell GM stock in the future. Treasury has merely exchanged a legal right to repayment for an uncertain hope of sharing in the future growth of GM. A debt-for-equity swap is not a repayment," he wrote.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/04/22/grassley-slams-gm-administration-loans-repaid-bailout-money/

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 16