DebateGate
General Category => 3DHS => Topic started by: sirs on September 15, 2015, 01:21:51 PM
-
Unions help keep working families strong. Scott Walker's attacks on unions and workers' rights aren't leadership—they're bullying -H
.@HillaryClinton Actually, we're protecting the American worker from being forced to support candidates like you. - SW
touche' 8)
-
Protecting them from higher wages, safe workplaces and arbitrary dismissal.
Scott Walker is a Johny One Note whose candidacy seems every day less successful.
-
lol
-
The guy is not much of a speaker, and he has only one issue: unionbusting.
He is like a magician that has run out of rabbits.
-
Given your track record of proclamations, I feel better. Thanks
-
I hope that he handles other problems as well as he handled his states problem with Unions.
-
He has only one note. He will never be nominated. If the Kochs did not feed him, he'd be outta there tomorrow.
-
Boy, you can be soooo.....all over the park. Basically, it would appear no one gets the nomination, as many times as you've proclaimed so-n-so will never be nominated. And here we've been told that the Kochs can buy the nomination, so if they're supporting Walker, he'd be a cinch to be the nominee. Inquiring minds
-
I am sure the Kochs think they can buy the nomination. They sure as Hell will try.
But Walker has slipped from 17% down to 3%
Explain how that is good news.
-
Putting aside the irrational concept that apparently no Republican is going to get the nomination I'm trying to figure out the nonsense that if its the "Oligarchy" that decides who the nominee is going to be, and the Kochs are obviously knee deep in the Oligarchy business, how is it that the ones they're supposedly fronting aren't winning??
-
The most likely candidate is still Jeb Bush.
He is the one with the most money.
He will "come from behind in a surprising blah blah blah"
-
So, now its not what the Oligarchy wants, its who has the most money? That would be Trump & Clinton, although Clinton's fortunes are largely Oligarchy bought and paid for
-
Trump and Clinton are pikers compared with the big money behind Bush.
-
Naaaa...Clinton is covered in spades. Trump's money is largely his own, and if its now who simply has the most money, then "obviously" its going to be Trump & Clinton as the respective nominees......per your parameters of course
-
Clinton's personal fortune is not going to pay for her campaign and it therefore useless.
I don't think that if Trump were the nominee, that most of the money would come from Trump.
Romney was richer than God, and his campaign was paid for by donors, not Romney.
-
Sure it can.....and doing so. And again, you can think anything you want, but if the parameters as to who will be the nominee now is based on who has the most money in their pockets, that's messers Trump & Clinton