DebateGate
General Category => 3DHS => Topic started by: sirs on June 09, 2017, 02:35:48 AM
-
What the Dems have left now is;
- to proclaim how Comey's testimony supposedly raises more questions than it answers
- to drumbeat the notion of obstruction, despite no actual evidence of what exactly is being obstructed
-
Due to who comey is it's extremely hard to disregard him. He's definately not the kind of guy who won't go down fighting. This will take awhile and damage will occur
-
Comey is a disgrace!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rX6gYSTDBAY
-
Due to who comey is it's extremely hard to disregard him. He's definately not the kind of guy who won't go down fighting. This will take awhile and damage will occur
I guess this begs the question......who's disregarding him, and what he said?? What he made painfully clear, is that a) there was no collusion, and b) there was no obstruction. He also didn't believe Trump was completely trustworthy, but that's hardly earth shattering news...nor a condition to be charged with obstruction.
So......who again is disregarding him?
-
i misspoke . I`m thinking people did not expect him to react this way from his dismissal. I`ve seen in my jobs several people react exactly like comey and always the employer thinks that would not happen.
-
ok, I can support that notion. I mean, there's no way anyone can ascertain the motivation or intent of someone, without a clear pattern of support. I do find it ironic that Comey could apparently find intent of how he saw some of Trumps comments and "questions", but somehow couldn't find any intent with Clinton's attempted bleachbitting her server and physcially hammering all her & her staff's tech devices, when subpoened by Congress.
-
I am not much of a supervisor , but I have to suppose that I would fire a subordinate manager that very clearly did not trust me with the truth.