Author Topic: Ok...heard most of it, saw some of it...  (Read 1404 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Ok...heard most of it, saw some of it...
« on: July 22, 2016, 01:27:20 AM »
While it didn't bring the house down, it was to the point, and an excellent political indictment of everything Clinton.  The only thing I wished he had highlighted better was her utter incompetence as SoS
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Ok...heard most of it, saw some of it...
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2016, 10:07:07 AM »
The one major desire of the Republican Party, ie to make government smaller, is clearly NOT a concern of The Donald.

Trump is simply returning to the idiotic "Law and Order" theme of Nixon.

Most crime is local and  is dealt with by municipal, county and state authorities, What would Trump have done to prevent the Pulse nightclub massacre or the shooting of cops in Dallas? The President has nothing to do with preventing, prosecuting or punishing such crimes.  What could any president do to prevent some suicidal nut with a bomb or an assault rifle?

When Trump says he knows how the system works, he isn't lying. The President makes a promise, discovers that he has no authority to deal with the issue and blames the Congress or state and local laws for his inability to do anything. It's like promising a beautiful condo, selling shared of it and then keeping the deposits and bailing out with nothing ever being built.

No president has the authority that he thinks he has before he is elected, A huge number of voters think they are electing a king or some other sort of despot with omnipotent powers, despite all past evidence that this is false.

President Obama thought he could close Guantanamo, because it makes perfect sense to do so: it costs a million dollars a year per prisoner compared with $25,000 at most in a maximum security prison in the US. But Congress turned it into a political football and the President can't do anything, through no fault of his own, becaue Congress refuses to fund moving the prisoners.

If a president cannot close a federal prison, then how much power does he actually wield?  Certainly not enough to do even a small fraction of what The Donald promised. The GOP platform was as anti-LGBTQ document as has ever been agreed to by any party, yet Trump says her will defend all the LGBTQ people as no president ever has before. Does he have the power to station federal agents at the door of every gay club in the nation? How can a president stop a suicidal nut with an assault rifle or a bomb?

Trump is a fraudster trying to sell us on another of his bogus deals.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Ok...heard most of it, saw some of it...
« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2016, 12:10:25 PM »
How many times must it be repeated for you, that Trump was never a Conservative?  So of course his platform isn't going to be a campaign on smaller government.  What it is, is taking a book out of Obama's playbook and declaring how much more authority the executive branch is to exert

And he's going to continue to remind everyone how Clinton has perfected in playing the system.  He just needs to more often remind folks of the overt incompetence she also brings to the Democrat table
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Ok...heard most of it, saw some of it...
« Reply #3 on: July 22, 2016, 07:53:26 PM »
 
The one major desire of the Republican Party, ie to make government smaller, is clearly NOT a concern of The Donald.
That is a partial list of the reasons that Trump didn't start as my favorite
Quote


, What would Trump have done to prevent the Pulse nightclub massacre or the shooting of cops in Dallas? The President has nothing to do with preventing, prosecuting or punishing such crimes.  What could any president do to prevent some suicidal nut with a bomb or an assault rifle?





  I totally do not know what President Trump might do.

But what I would do would be to propose and push legislation requiring armed guards at any venue that has a permit to entertain a large number of persons.

I would not require paid guards , or specialized guards , volunteers, owners and people whose main function is other than guard could be armed to meet the requirement.

The main requirement for these guards should be a training course that can washout the entirely unsuitable and teach safety and effectiveness.

In short, the elimination of the "gun free" zone.

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Ok...heard most of it, saw some of it...
« Reply #4 on: July 22, 2016, 09:32:02 PM »
Mass shootings are not the main issue facing this country, and  eliminating "gun free zones" would not prevent them.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Ok...heard most of it, saw some of it...
« Reply #5 on: July 22, 2016, 09:52:01 PM »
No one claimed elimination, merely that's where bad guys, intent on killing large #s, will go.....the reason being that "gun free zones" only prevent law abiding folks from defending themselves from a would be mass murderer
« Last Edit: July 22, 2016, 11:49:00 PM by sirs »
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Ok...heard most of it, saw some of it...
« Reply #6 on: July 22, 2016, 10:51:16 PM »
Mass shootings are not the main issue facing this country, and  eliminating "gun free zones" would not prevent them.

What does the establishment of a gun free zone prevent?



How many years has it been since Hillary Clinton has been in a gun free zone?