Author Topic: Liberalism Created the AZ Shooter  (Read 1289 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Kramer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5762
  • Repeal ObamaCare
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Liberalism Created the AZ Shooter
« on: January 17, 2011, 12:17:46 PM »
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/us/16loughner.html?_r=2&adxnnlx=1295272816-mzPTbiXmgfYK5d56DmiDjg&pagewanted=print

Folks, millions of young people have gone through the system. That system of course is our education system and Political Correctness system, which have the heavy hand of Liberalism weaved throughout. Of course all of lives today is heavily influenced by Liberalism. Liberalism is in every facet, every aspect, and every detail of our young peoples lives. From sports, the environment, to sex education Liberals have stamped their sick ideals to influence children minds and push them towards tolerating every portion of Liberalism. The AZ shooter is just one of millions that have had their lives carved out by Liberals and their thought processes ruined by the perversion of Liberalism. Hold on to your hats because this is just the tip of the iceberg. Legions of twisted, perverted, anti-family, ant social, and anti-American kids are coming of age. Soon, like rats, they will be crawling around in every aspect of our lives. They will be the next Congress, the next teachers, the next police, firemen, and our next leaders & decision makers. Sadly, most of them have not been educated and given the proper tools to lead and make good life decisions. Liberalism is cancer to any society but to a free society it will surely take it down and destroy it.

Looking Behind the Mug-Shot Grin
By THE NEW YORK TIMES

This article was reported by Jo Becker, Serge F. Kovaleski, Michael Luo and Dan Barry and written by Mr. Barry.

TUCSON — Moments after the swirl of panic, blood, death and shock, the suspect was face down on the pavement and squirming under the hold of two civilians, his shaved head obscured by a beanie and the hood of his dark sweatshirt.

Deputy Sheriff Thomas Audetat, a chiseled former Marine with three tours in Iraq to his credit, dug his knee into the gangly young man’s back and cuffed him. With the aid of another deputy, he relieved the heroic civilians of their charge and began searching for weapons other than the Glock semiautomatic pistol, secured nearby under a civilian’s foot, that had just fired 31 rounds.

In the left front pocket, two 15-round magazines. In the right front pocket, a black, four-inch folding knife. “Are there any other weapons on you?” Deputy Audetat recalled demanding.

“Back right pocket.”

But the back right pocket contained no weapons. Instead, in a Ziploc bag, the deputy found about $20 in cash, some change, a credit card and, peeking through the plastic as if proffering a calling card, an Arizona driver’s license for one Jared Lee Loughner, 22.

Deputy Audetat lifted the passive, even relaxed suspect to his feet and led him to the patrol car, where the man twisted himself awkwardly across the back seat, face planted on the floor board. Then he invoked an oddly timed constitutional right. “I plead the Fifth,” Mr. Loughner said, though the deputy had no intention of questioning him. “I plead the Fifth.”

At a Pima County Sheriff’s Department substation, Deputy Audetat guided Mr. Loughner to a tiny interview room with a two-way mirror, directed him to a plastic blue chair and offered him a glass of water. The deputy detected no remorse; nothing.

Now to another building for the mug shot. Look into the camera, the suspect was told. He smiled.

Click.

Mr. Loughner’s spellbinding mug shot — that bald head, that bright-eyed gaze, that smile — yields no answer to why, why, why, why, the aching question cried out in a subdued Tucson synagogue last week. Does the absence of hair suggest a girding for battle? Does the grin convey a sense of accomplishment, or complete disengagement from the consequence of his actions?

And is his slightly blackened left eye all but winking at the wholesale violence that preceded the camera’s click? The attack on a meet-and-greet event with a congresswoman outside a supermarket; the killing of six people, including the chief federal judge in Arizona and a 9-year-old girl; the wounding of 13, including Representative Gabrielle Giffords, shot in the head.

Since last Saturday’s shooting frenzy in Tucson, investigators and the news media have spent the week frantically trying to assemble the Jared Loughner jigsaw puzzle in hopes that the pieces will fit, a clear picture will emerge and the answer to why will be found, providing the faint reassurance of a dark mystery solved.

Instead, the pattern of facts so far presents only a lack of one, a curlicue of contradictory moments open to broad interpretation. Here he is, a talented saxophonist with a prestigious high school jazz band, and there he is, a high school dropout. Here he is, a clean-cut employee for an Eddie Bauer store, and there he is, so unsettling a presence that tellers at a local bank would feel for the alarm button when he walked in.

Those who see premeditation in the acts Mr. Loughner is accused of committing can cite, for example, his pleading of the Fifth Amendment or the envelope the authorities found in his safe that bore the handwritten words “Giffords,” “My assassination” and “I planned ahead” — or how he bided his time in the supermarket, even using the men’s room. Those who suspect he is insane, and therefore a step removed from being responsible for his actions, can point to any of his online postings, including:

“If 987,123,478,961,876,341,234,671,234, 098,601,978,618 is the year in B.C.E then the previous year of 987,123,478,961,876, 341,234,671,234,098,601,978,618 B.C.E is 987,123,478,961,876,341,234,671,234,098, 601,978,619 B.C.E.”

What the cacophony of facts do suggest is that Mr. Loughner is struggling with a profound mental illness (most likely paranoid schizophrenia, many psychiatrists say); that his recent years have been marked by stinging rejection — from his country’s military, his community college, his girlfriends and, perhaps, his father; that he, in turn, rejected American society, including its government, its currency, its language, even its math. Mr. Loughner once declared to his professor that the number 6 could be called 18.

As he alienated himself from his small clutch of friends, grew contemptuous of women in positions of power and became increasingly oblivious to basic social mores, Mr. Loughner seemed to develop a dreamy alternate world, where the sky was sometimes orange, the grass sometimes blue and the Internet’s informational chaos provided refuge.

He became an echo chamber for stray ideas, amplifying, for example, certain grandiose tenets of a number of extremist right-wing groups — including the need for a new money system and the government’s mind-manipulation of the masses through language.

In the last three months, Mr. Loughner had a 9-millimeter bullet tattooed on his right shoulder blade and turned increasingly to the Internet to post indecipherable tutorials about the new currency, bemoan the prevalence of illiteracy and settle scores with the Army and Pima Community College, both of which had shunned him. He also may have felt rejected by the American government in general, and by Ms. Giffords in particular, with whom he had a brief — and, to him, unsatisfactory — encounter in 2007.

Nearly four years later, investigators say, Mr. Loughner methodically planned another encounter with her. Eight days ago, on a sunny Saturday morning, he took a $14 taxi ride to a meet-your-representative gathering outside a Safeway, they say, and he was armed for slaughter.

Clarence Dupnik, the outspoken sheriff of Pima County, was driving back from Palm Springs when he received word of the shooting. Ms. Giffords and the slain judge, John M. Roll, were friends of his. “It was like someone kicked me in the stomach,” he recalled. “Shock turned to anger. The closer to Tucson, the angrier I got.”

Although his law enforcement colleagues are diligently working to shore up their criminal case to counter a possible plea of insanity that could mitigate punishment, Sheriff Dupnik seems torn about Mr. Loughner’s mental state.

“There’s no doubt in my mind that the whole trial will be about did he know right from wrong,” the sheriff said. “We’ll have 15 psychiatrists saying yes. We’ll have 15 psychiatrists saying no. What do I say? I think he’s mentally disturbed.”

Disturbed enough to be found guilty but insane?

“I majored in psychology at the university,” Sheriff Dupnik answered. “Based on what I’ve seen, he is psychotic, he has serious problems with reality, and I think he’s delusional. Does he meet the legal test of guilty but insane? I don’t know.”

Early Signs of Alienation

One spring morning in 2006, a student showed up at Mountain View High School so intoxicated that he had to be taken to Northwest Hospital, five miles away. A sheriff’s deputy went to the hospital’s emergency room to question the inebriated 17-year-old student, whose eyes were red from crying.

According to a police report, the teenager explained that he had taken a bottle of vodka from his father’s liquor cabinet around 1:30 that morning and, for the next several hours, drank much of its contents. Why? Because I was upset that my father had yelled at me, said the student, Jared Loughner.

In the search for clues to explain the awfulness to come, this moment stands out as the first public breach in the facade of domestic calm in the modest Loughner home on Soledad Avenue in the modest subdivision of Orangewood Estates, its front door shrouded by the wide canopy of an old mesquite tree, its perimeter walled off as if for fortification.

The mother, Amy Loughner, worked as the manager of one of the area’s parks. Pleasant though reserved, she impressed the parents of her son’s friends as a doting mother who shepherded her only child to his saxophone lessons and concerts, and encouraged his dream of one day attending the Juilliard School, the prestigious arts conservatory in New York.

Once, when he was in the ninth grade, Mr. Loughner’s parents had to leave town for a week, and he stayed with the family of his friend, Alex Montanaro. Before leaving, Mrs. Loughner presented Alex’s mother, Michelle Montanaro, with a document that temporarily granted her power of attorney for Jared — in case something happened.

“This is how I knew his mom doted on Jared,” Ms. Montanaro said. “She thought of everything for her son.”

But the father, Randy Loughner, was so rarely mentioned by his son that some of Jared’s friends assumed that his parents were divorced. Mr. Loughner installed carpets and pool decks, and spent much of his free time restoring old cars. Jared drove a Chevy Nova; his mother, an El Camino.

Some neighbors saw Randy Loughner as private; others as standoffish, even a bit scary. As a member of one neighboring family suggested: if your child’s ball came to rest in the Loughners’ yard, you left it there.

And, occasionally, word would trickle back to the homes of Jared’s friends of a family unhappy in its own way. That Jared and his father did not get along. That a palpable sense of estrangement hovered in the Loughner home.

“He would tell me that he didn’t want to go home because he didn’t like being home,” recalled Ashley Figueroa, 21, who dated him for several months in high school.

Teased for a while as a Harry Potter look-alike, then adopting a more disheveled look, Jared seemed to find escape for a while in music, developing a taste for the singular sounds of John Coltrane and Charlie Parker. A talented saxophonist, he could show off his own musical chops by sweetly performing such jazz classics as “Summertime.”

He belonged to the Arizona Jazz Academy, where the director, Doug Tidaback, found him to be withdrawn, though clearly dedicated. He played for two different ensembles, an 18-piece band and a smaller combo, which meant four hours of rehearsal on weekends and many discussions between the director and the mother about her son’s musical prospects.

But Mr. Tidaback did not recall ever seeing Jared’s father at any of the rehearsals or performances. And one other thing: the music director suspected that the teenager might be using marijuana.

“Being around people who smoke pot, they tend to be a little paranoid,” Mr. Tidaback said. “I got that sense from him. That might have been part of his being withdrawn.”

Mr. Tidaback, it seems, was onto something. Several of Jared’s friends said he used marijuana, mushrooms and, especially, the hallucinogenic herb called Salvia divinorum. When smoked or chewed, the plant can cause brief but intense highs.

None of this necessarily distinguished him from his high school buddies. Several of them dabbled in drugs, played computer games like World of Warcraft and Diablo and went through Goth and alternative phases. Jared and a friend, Zane Gutierrez, would also shoot guns for practice in the desert; Jared, Mr. Gutierrez recalled, became quite proficient at picking off can targets with a gun.

But Jared, a curious teenager who at times could be intellectually intimidating, stood out because of his passionate opinions about government — and his obsession with dreams.

He became intrigued by antigovernment conspiracy theories, including that the Sept. 11 attacks were perpetrated by the government and that the country’s central banking system was enslaving its citizens. His anger would well up at the sight of President George W. Bush, or in discussing what he considered to be the nefarious designs of government.

“I think he feels the people should be able to govern themselves,” said Ms. Figueroa, his former girlfriend. “We didn’t need a higher authority.”

Breanna Castle, 21, another friend from junior and senior high school, agreed. “He was all about less government and less America,” she said, adding, “He thought it was full of conspiracies and that the government censored the Internet and banned certain books from being read by us.”

Among the books that he would later cite as his favorites: “Animal Farm,” “Fahrenheit 451,” “Mein Kampf” and “The Communist Manifesto.” Also: “Peter Pan.”

And there was that fascination with dreams. Ms. Castle acknowledged that in high school, she too developed an interest in analyzing her dreams. But Jared’s interest was much deeper.

“It started off with dream interpretation, but then he delved into the idea of accessing different parts of your mind and trying to control your entire brain at all times,” she said. “He was troubled that we only use part of our brain, and he thought that he could unlock his entire brain through lucid dreaming.”

With “lucid dreaming,” the dreamer supposedly becomes aware that he or she is dreaming and then is able to control those dreams. George Osler IV, the father of one of Jared’s former friends, said his son explained the notion to him this way: “You can fly. You can experience all kinds of things that you can’t experience in reality.”

But the Mr. Osler worried about the healthiness of this boyhood obsession, particularly the notion that “This is all not real.”

Gradually, friends and acquaintances say, there came a detachment from the waking world — a strangeness that made others uncomfortable.

Mr. Loughner unnerved one parent, Mr. Osler, by smiling when there wasn’t anything to smile about. He puzzled another parent, Ms. Montanaro, by reading aloud a short story he had written, about angels and the end of the world, that she found strange and incomprehensible. And he rattled Breanna Castle, his friend, by making a video that featured a gas station, traffic and his incoherent mumbles.

“The more people became shocked and worried about him, the more withdrawn he got,” Ms. Castle said.

Not long after showing up intoxicated at school, Jared dropped out. He also dropped out of band. Then, in September 2007, he and a friend were caught with drug paraphernalia in a white van.

Something was happening to Jared Loughner. It was clear to his friends, clear to anyone who encountered him.

“He would get so upset about bigger issues, like why do positive and negative magnets have to attract each other,” recalled Mr. Gutierrez, the friend who joined him in target practice in the desert. “He had the most incredible thoughts, but he could not handle them.”

Facing Rejection

Two Pima Community College police officers drove into Orangewood Estates and up to a flat-roofed house on Soledad Avenue, the one with that crooked mesquite tree in the front and the old cars always parked in the driveway. Their mission that night in late September was dicey enough to require two other officers to linger in the neighborhood as backup.

The owner of the house, Randy Loughner, locked away the dogs and directed the officers to the garage, where his son, Jared, a student at the community college, was waiting. One of the officers explained that the purpose of their visit was to serve Jared with a “Notice of Immediate Suspension” from the college.

The officer, Dana Mattocks, read the letter aloud, detailing a litany of troubled and disruptive behavior, including the recent posting of an unsettling video titled “Pima Community College School — Genocide/Scam — Free Education — Broken United States Constitution.”

As Officer Mattocks spoke, he later recalled, Jared Loughner stared at him as if in a “constant trance.” The notice was handed to the young man, who then read the letter back to the officers.

“Even though we spent approximately one hours relaying the information and narration of Jared’s actions that brought him to his current predicament,” Officer Mattocks wrote in a subsequent report, “Jared left his silence and spoke out saying, ‘I realize now that this is all a scam.’ ”

The officers declared the meeting over, chatted briefly with Jared’s father in the backyard and left the Loughner family to deal with this “current predicament.”

What had happened?

After dropping out of high school, Jared Loughner had tried to straighten up, friends say. He shed his unkempt image, cut drugs from his life and indulged only in the occasional 24-ounce can of Miller High Life. He began wearing crisp clothes and got a job at Eddie Bauer.

“He was damned strait-laced and, I believe, had given up weed,” Mr. Gutierrez recalled. “At Eddie Bauer, he tucked his shirt in, wore a belt and dressed himself nicely, real clean cut. He could have been in any office building and would have looked fine.”

And when the two friends got together, Mr. Loughner would limit himself to that one big can of beer — he was notoriously frugal — and talk of bettering himself. “He started saying that he wanted to stay out of trouble and was thinking about doing good stuff with his life,” Mr. Gutierrez said.

Still, things never quite clicked.

Mr. Loughner seemed to meet rejection at every turn. He tried to enlist in the Army in 2008 but failed its drug test. He held a series of jobs, often briefly: Peter Piper Pizza, but not long enough to make it past the three-month probationary period, an executive said; the Mandarin Grill, where the owner recalled that after less than a month of employment, the teenager simply stopped showing up.

After leaving his job at Eddie Bauer, he became a volunteer at an animal-care center in Tucson. On his application, he came across as a normal and ambitious teenager, expressing interest in “community service, fun, reference and experience.” But within two months he was told not to come back until he could follow rules.

At least there was the Northwest Campus of Pima Community College, where tuition was affordable, the quail often skittered across the grounds and Mr. Loughner found intellectual sanctuary. Beginning in the summer of 2005, when he was just 16, he began taking classes: music fundamentals, philosophy, sign language, algebra, biology, computers, logic — even Pilates.

But beginning in 2010, Mr. Loughner’s mostly private struggle with basic societal norms tipped into the public settings of the classroom, the library, the campus.

Pima Community College has six campuses, four educational centers and nearly 70,000 students. But one student in particular, it seems, came to occupy the attention of its administrators and security officers.

Disruptions and Monitoring

In February, an administrator reported to the campus police that Mr. Loughner had disrupted the class with his strange reaction to the reading of another student’s poem, taking a huge leap from its context to abortion, wars and killing people. The school official described him as “creepy.” They would keep an eye on him.

In April, the director of the library summoned the police because Mr. Loughner was making loud noises while listening to music through his earphones. According to a police report, he was advised “that this behavior was not an acceptable practice for a public setting, especially in a library.” The student said it would not happen again.

In May, an instructor reported to the campus police that when she informed Mr. Loughner that he had gotten a B in her Pilates class, he threw his work down and declared the grade unacceptable. Things got so tense that the instructor felt intimidated, and feared that the moment might become physical.

In June, a school counselor investigated an incident in which Mr. Loughner had disrupted a math class. When she inquired, Mr. Loughner first said that he was offended by the inquiry, then explained, “My instructor said he called a number 6, and I said I call it 18.” He said he also asked the instructor to explain, “How can you deny math instead of accept it?” He went on to strike the increasingly familiar theme of persecution: that he was being “scammed.”

“This student was warned,” the counselor, Delisa Siddall, wrote in a report. “He has extreme views and frequently meanders from the point. He seems to have difficulty understanding how his actions impact others, yet very attuned to his unique ideology that is not always homogeneous. ... Since he reported that an incident such as this occurred in another class, administrators will have to help this student clearly understand what is appropriate classroom dialog.”

Mr. Loughner said that he would not ask any more questions for fear of being expelled. All the while, though, he was expressing himself in sometimes odd conversations with other players in an online strategy game. Writing under the moniker “Dare,” he denounced his “scam” education, expressed frustration over his continued unemployment (“How many applications ... is a lot?”) and revealed that he had been fired from five jobs — including one, at a hamburger restaurant, that he lost because he left while in the throes of what he called a “mental breakdown.”

He also wrote of his “strong interest in logic.” But, it seems, it was a logic whose inductive and deductive reasoning made sense only to him.

Around this time, Mr. Loughner bumped into his old girlfriend, Ms. Figueroa, in a store. Years earlier, she had fallen for a shy boy in her computer class; they would hold hands during football games and hang out after marching band practice. Now here he was, his long locks shorn and an off-kilter air. A completely different person, it seemed.

“It was kind of like he wasn’t there,” Ms. Figueroa recalled. “I can’t put my finger on it. It just wasn’t a good feeling. I kind of got a chill.”

In September, Mr. Loughner filled out paperwork to have his record expunged on the 2007 drug paraphernalia charge. Although he did not need to bother — he completed a diversion program, so the charge was never actually on his record — Judge Jose Luis Castillo, who handled the case in Pima County Consolidated Justice Court, said after the shooting that, in retrospect, it definitely “crossed my mind” that Mr. Loughner was worried that the charge would prevent him from buying a weapon.

And that same month, there was another incident at Pima Community College, another class disruption caused by Mr. Loughner, another summoning of the campus police. A teacher had informed him that he would receive only a half-credit for handing in an assignment late, and he was declaring this a violation of his right to freedom of speech.

One of the responding police officers began to engage him with simple questions, only to enter the Loughner world of logic, in which freedom of speech morphed into freedom of thought and his teacher was required to accept the thoughts he wrote down as a passing grade. The other officer took note of the student’s tilted head and jittery, darting eyes.

A few days later, during a meeting with a school administrator, Mr. Loughner said that he had paid for his courses illegally because, “I did not pay with gold and silver” — a standard position among right-wing extremist groups. With Mr. Loughner’s consent, that same administrator then arranged to meet with the student and his mother to discuss the creation of a “behavioral contract” for him, after which the official noted: “Throughout the meeting, Jared held himself very rigidly and smiled overtly at inappropriate times.”

At the same time, other college administrators and officers were just learning of the “Pima Community College School-Genocide” video, in which the narrator says, “We are examining the torture of students,” and “I haven’t forgotten the teacher that gave me a B for freedom of speech,” and “This is Pima Community College, one of the biggest scams in America” — and “Thank you ... This is Jared ... from Pima College.”

Mr. Loughner was informed in his father’s garage that he was suspended. Not long after, the college sent him a letter saying that he would not be welcomed back until he presented certification from a mental health professional that he was not a threat. That never happened.

By now the strange presence that was Jared Loughner was known in places beyond the Northwest Campus of Pima Community College.

Leaving an Impression

At a small local branch of a major bank, for example, the tellers would have their fingers on the alarm button whenever they saw him approaching.

It was not just his appearance — the pale shaved head and eyebrows — that unnerved them. It was also the aggressive, often sexist things that he said, including asserting that women should not be allowed to hold positions of power or authority.

One individual with knowledge of the situation said Mr. Loughner once got into a dispute with a female branch employee after she told him that a request of his would violate bank policy. He brusquely challenged the woman, telling her that she should not have any power.

“He was considered to be short-tempered and made people at the bank very uncomfortable,” said the individual, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the person was not authorized to discuss the matter.

The bank’s employees could not forget how, after bulletproof glass was installed at the bank, Mr. Loughner would try to stick his finger through a small space atop the glass and laugh to himself, the person said.

And employees at the Sacred Art Tattoo shop would not forget that day in November — the same month in which Mr. Loughner bought a Glock — when he walked in wearing jean shorts and a muscle shirt and holding up a 9-millimeter bullet that he said he wanted replicated on his right shoulder.

It took less than a half-hour and cost $60. And when it was done, Mr. Loughner insisted on shaking the artist’s hand.

Then, a week later, he returned to get a second bullet tattoo.

“I started talking to him about what he liked to do, hobbies, pastimes,” recalled Carl Grace, 30, who drew the second tattoo. “He said he dreamed 14 to 15 hours a day. He said he knew how to control his sleeping and control his dreams.” But when the artist asked about the meaning behind the tattoo, the customer just smiled.

“When he left, I said: ‘That’s a weird dude. That’s a Columbine candidate.’ ”

A Busy Morning

At 9:41 last Saturday morning, a 60-year-old cabdriver named John Marino pulled his Ford Crown Victoria into the parking lot of a Circle K convenience store on West Cortaro Farms Road to collect his first fare of the day. The cashier inside raised her finger to signal one minute.

Then out came his customer, just another customer, a normal-looking young man. Climbing into the back seat, the man said he needed to go to the Safeway supermarket on Oracle Road, on the Northwest side. Their five-mile ride began.

Mr. Marino has been driving a taxi for a dozen years; he likes to say that he has hauled everyone from street walkers to mayors. He does not pry for information from his passengers, mostly because he doesn’t care. But if a customer wants to talk, he will talk. He glanced at his rear-view mirror and saw his passenger looking out the window. The passenger was quiet, until he wasn’t.

“Do you always remember everybody you pick up?” Mr. Marino recalled the man asking.

“Yeah, vaguely,” Mr. Marino says he answered. “I’ve been doing this a long time. It’s hard to remember everybody.”

At another point, the passenger blurted out, “I drink too much.” To which the cabdriver answered, “Oh, that’s too bad.”

Then it was back to silence.

By this point, the passenger, Mr. Loughner, had already had a full day.

Late the night before, he had dropped off a roll of 35-millimeter film to be developed at a Walgreens on West Ina Road. Law-enforcement officials would later say the roll included many photographs of Mr. Loughner wearing a bright red G-string and posing with a Glock. In some photos, presumably mirrored reflections, he holds the gun by his crotch; in others, next to his naked buttocks.

At 12:30 in the morning, he checked into Room 411 at a Motel 6 less than two miles from his house — an occasional habit, his parents later told investigators. The motel, a mottled brown building, sits near a railroad track; one of its rooms is still boarded up, marking where a guest shot himself recently.

Less than two hours later, he hopped back in his Chevy Nova to run a couple of errands, including a return to the Walgreens to collect those photographs of him posing nearly naked with a Glock. Soon after that, he posted a message on his Myspace page: “Goodbye friends.”

Shortly after 6, he headed back out for more predawn errands, including a visit to a Super Wal-Mart to buy ammunition and a black backpack-style diaper bag.

At 7:30, minutes after sunrise, he was stopped by an Arizona Game and Fish Department officer for running a red light, but was cordial and cooperative in providing his license, registration and insurance card.

He returned home, where his father confronted him about the contents of the black diaper bag he was lifting out the Chevy’s trunk. He mumbled something before dashing into the surrounding desert, his father giving futile chase in a vehicle. (Days later, a man walking in the desert came across a black diaper bag jammed with ammunition.)

Mr. Loughner then made his way to the Circle K, about a mile away. He called for a cab.

Now that cab was delivering its passenger in a hooded sweatshirt to his destination, the Safeway supermarket plaza, where a congresswoman was about to greet constituents. Mr. Loughner pulled out the Ziploc bag where he kept his cash and handed Mr. Marino a $20 bill for the $14.25 fare. The driver could not break the bill, so the two men went into the supermarket to get change.

Mr. Marino got in line at the customer-service desk, behind someone cashing in a winning lottery ticket. He received a few bills for the $20 and handed Mr. Loughner a $5 bill — meaning his tip was 75 cents. The cabdriver would later wonder why, considering what was about to happen, his passenger didn’t just let him keep the $20.

Before going their separate ways, Mr. Marino recalled, Mr. Loughner asked, “Can I shake your hand?”

Sure.

“And I noticed his hands were really sweaty,” recalled the cabdriver who had seen all types. “You know?”

Reporting was contributed by A.G. Sulzberger, Richard Oppel and Anissa Tanweer from Tucson; Sarah Wheaton from New York; and Janie Lorber from Washington. Jack Begg, Toby Lyles, Jack Styczynski and Kitty Bennett contributed research.

Kramer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5762
  • Repeal ObamaCare
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberalism Created the AZ Shooter
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2011, 10:13:31 PM »
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_congresswoman_shot_college_response;_ylt=AoNwZQ8tVIYKxpzVcLTFCXSs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTRhNW9oZ3VkBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTEwMTE3L3VzX2NvbmdyZXNzd29tYW5fc2hvdF9jb2xsZWdlX3Jlc3BvbnNlBGNjb2RlA21vc3Rwb3B1bGFyBGNwb3MDNQRwb3MDMgRwdANob21lX2Nva2UEc2VjA3luX2hlYWRsaW5lX2xpc3QEc2xrA2NvbGxlZ2Vzc3RydQ--

Colleges struggle to cope with troubled students
By ERIC GORSKI, AP Education Writer Eric Gorski, Ap Education Writer Mon Jan 17, 2:05 pm ET

The case of Arizona shooting suspect Jared Loughner, suspended from his community college last fall after a pattern of bizarre behavior, provides another jarring reminder of the challenges colleges face dealing with troubled students.

With limited resources, complicated laws, more students in need of mental health help and echoes of the Virginia Tech massacre all part of the mix, schools face the conundrum of trying to create a safe environment without overreacting.

"What you're really doing is deciding, 'Where do I want to make the mistakes? Do I want to be over-broad in protecting civil liberties or over-broad in protecting safety?'" said Steven McDonald, general counsel for the Rhode Island School of Design and an expert on student privacy laws and campus safety. "And you're never going to get it exactly right."

McDonald said the pendulum has swung toward safety in recent years, but could swing back if schools overreach.

Many colleges and universities have started or strengthened threat assessment teams of administrators, counseling directors, campus police chiefs and others who meet regularly to field concerns about disturbing behavior and to investigate them.

But the issues are not always clear-cut. What should be protected as free speech? When does behavior cross the line from odd to potentially dangerous? When is suspension or expulsion warranted, or forced mental health treatment?

"There is a lot more awareness of the need to take action, but we are still constrained by considerations of civil liberties and the like," said Ada Meloy, general counsel for the American Council on Education, an umbrella group for higher education.

"It's not illegal to be a college student with mental health issues," she said. "There are plenty of them out there. It's very difficult to determine which ones merit being isolated from the college community."

Studies show more students are arriving on campus with mental health issues. A recent American College Counseling Association survey found 44 percent of students who visit college counseling centers have severe psychological disorders, up from 16 percent a decade ago. One in four students is on psychiatric medication, compared to 17 percent in 2000.

Officials at Pima Community College, where Loughner was a student, released 51 pages of police documents depicting him at times as "creepy," "very hostile" and "having difficulty understanding what he had done wrong in the classroom."

After five incidents that drew the attention of campus police — a rambling YouTube video that called the school a scam and associated it with genocide was the final straw — school officials told Loughner and his parents that to return to classes he would need to undergo a mental health exam to show he was not a danger. He never returned.

Some critics have said the school should have gone a step further and sought to force Loughner into counseling, which Arizona state law allows. But school officials have said their response was appropriate given the circumstances.

For years, many colleges said the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, or FERPA, handcuffed their ability to share information about troubled students with those who could help — including parents.

But McDonald, the privacy law expert, said FERPA is much less constraining than is often portrayed. A health and safety exemption allows for, say, faculty to share records with the dean of students, threat assessment teams or campus police relatively easily, he said. In 2008, Congress amended the law in responses to the Virginia Tech tragedy, making it clear schools would not be punished if they have a rational basis for taking action.

The Americans With Disabilities Act prohibits discrimination against persons on the basis of their disability, including mental health problems. But exemptions covering harm to self and public safety exist there, too.

"The law in these areas can be kind of complicated, and many campuses don't have legal counsel or heavy-duty mental health expertise," McDonald said. "So we're being asked to do something that is really pretty hard."

Brett Sokolow, managing partner of the National Center for Higher Education Risk Management, which serves as legal counsel to 16 colleges and developed a model for behavioral intervention adopted on 450 to 500 campuses, said that is especially true at community colleges such as Pima, which lacks its own mental health counseling center.

But Sokolow said the problem is not always about the amount of money, but how it is spent.

"Colleges and universities are addicted to response," he said. "They're addicted to learning how to better manage emergencies and put up more security cameras and hire more police officers when this sort of thing occurs. I have no qualms, as long as they're spending (as much) on prevention as they are on response. And of course they're not."

At the University of Texas at Austin, officials bolstered prevention efforts after the Virginia Tech shootings by starting an advice line people can call with concerns about individuals who might otherwise go unnoticed. One campus assessment team deals with employees while another meets more regularly and deals with students. Both predated the shootings.

Most students come to the team's attention through UT's discipline system because state privacy laws prevent mental health centers from divulging information from clinical settings, said Jeffery Graves, associate vice president for legal affairs. And the largest proportion of cases involves students at risk of harming themselves, he said.

Often, cases involve a student with non-threatening behavioral problems: someone who had a conflict with a roommate and had to be moved to a new dorm, or a depressed student who stopped showering and holed up in his apartment.

Such cases can be referred to campus mental health counseling or outside specialists. Graves said cases with more ominous signs are flagged as potential threats: overt threats of violence; comments made to third parties, seen as more dangerous because comments to potential victims are often no more than attempts to intimidate; and people who go from making a lot of noise to silence, which can indicate the beginning of a planning period.

The campus alert system was put to the test in September when sophomore Colton Tooley opened fire with an assault rifle on campus, fled to the sixth floor of the university library and fatally shot himself. No one else was injured.

Tooley had not triggered any of UT's alarm bells; he was an introvert who earned good grades.

But once gunfire rang out, things went according to plan: Sirens blared, a lockdown text message was blasted out, and the campus of 50,000 students and 20,000 employees emptied in minutes as everyone sought safety inside.

"The goal is to not have something happen, to keep our campus safe," Graves said. "And so far, we think we've done a pretty good job. And I think that if, God forbid, something happens and we go into reactionary mode, we're pretty well prepared there too."

No preventive step, of course, is foolproof. Gerald Amada, retired former director of the mental health program at City College of San Francisco and author of three books on disruptive college students, questioned the worth of requiring students to provide a letter from a psychologist as a condition of their return from suspension.

The majority of letters are ambiguous, loaded with qualifiers and confusing because psychologists are wary of the legal implications of seeming to sign off on a student's return to campus, he said.

Still other schools have overreacted to perceived threats, Amada said. He cited a student at Valdosta State University in Georgia who was found to be a "clear and present danger" and expelled in 2007 after posting fliers and a collage on Facebook protesting planned parking garages on campus. The state Board of Regents overturned the expulsion.

Brian Van Brunt, director of the Counseling and Testing Center at Western Kentucky University and president of the American College Counseling Association, said campuses have made much progress on moving past the "silo" mentality that can keep different departments from talking and sharing information.

Still, even in the aftermath of a tragic incident that can be picked apart for lessons, clear paths forward remain elusive.

"These incidents of violence, they occur very infrequently," Van Brunt said. "And when they do, it's hard to draw a lot of conclusions in predicting future violence."

bsb

  • Guest
Re: Liberalism Created the AZ Shooter
« Reply #2 on: January 17, 2011, 10:43:48 PM »
"....more students are arriving on campus with mental health issues."

Global warming.

Kramer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5762
  • Repeal ObamaCare
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberalism Created the AZ Shooter
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2011, 11:24:26 PM »
"....more students are arriving on campus with mental health issues."

Global warming.

could be

but the fear of

caused by people like al gore and his movie.

Many students have been forced to see the movie and hear about all the phony dire consequences to Global Warming.

Many youngsters have been brainwashed by Liberal teachers. Lots have been forced to take drugs. In our day hyper kids were not drugged. Today children are being drugged for being over-active. Much of this drugging comes out of the teachers & doctors. Sure the drugged kids is less work for the teacher and yes the schools want to make the unionized teachers happy.

Kids have been forced to learn about homo sex and embrace diversity. Of course these things are promoted by Liberals. Liberals have infiltrated so-called Conservative areas too. Many Conservative voting districts still suffer heavy influence from Liberalism. Today, likely 75% of our chidren get a healthy dose of Liberalism through schools all the way up to college, through sports, Boy/Girl Scouts, TV, radio, pop culture, etc.

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberalism Created the AZ Shooter
« Reply #4 on: January 17, 2011, 11:34:26 PM »
Yeah, that is all Liberals do: force children to have gay sex and take drugs.
You are such a moron.

The main reason kids are hyper is that they are overdosed on corn syrup sweeteners from soft drinks that are on sale in most schools. It was not Liberals who put vending machines in public schools.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Kramer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5762
  • Repeal ObamaCare
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberalism Created the AZ Shooter
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2011, 11:43:08 PM »
Yeah, that is all Liberals do: force children to have gay sex and take drugs.
You are such a moron.

The main reason kids are hyper is that they are overdosed on corn syrup sweeteners from soft drinks that are on sale in most schools. It was not Liberals who put vending machines in public schools.


If what you say is true then why are kids drugged today at alarming rates? If it were that simple then why don't the Liberal teachers just get rid of the vending machines?

Hey Fat Head, check this out: http://www.familyrightsassociation.com/bin/white_papers-articles/drugging_our_children/

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11139
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberalism Created the AZ Shooter
« Reply #6 on: January 17, 2011, 11:47:59 PM »
The liberal whack-job James Eric Fuller, 63, who was shot in the knee by the Arizona shooter
then went on tirade this past Saturday and was carted away for a psychiatric exam after disrupting
the town-hall meeting by taking a photo of Tucson Tea Party co-founder Trent Humphries and shouting,
"You're dead!"

Whack-job Demorcrat Fuller had told The Post on Friday, the day before his arrest, that
top Republican figures should be tortured -- and their ears severed. "There would be torture
and then an ear necklace, with [Minnesota US Rep.] Michelle Bachmann and Sarah Palin's ears
toward the end, because they're small, female ears, and then Limbaugh, Hannity and the biggest
ears of all, Cheney's, in the center,".


http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/docs_upgrade_gabby_condition_LZ3Z2FWj75oEr26HpCeAdI
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

Kramer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5762
  • Repeal ObamaCare
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberalism Created the AZ Shooter
« Reply #7 on: January 17, 2011, 11:50:33 PM »
It was not Liberals who put vending machines in public schools.

how do you know this? Is this a Conservative thing, you know to own vending machine companies and to install vending machines on school campuses? Boy you are so well informed. Thank you for that factoid tidbit.

Kramer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5762
  • Repeal ObamaCare
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberalism Created the AZ Shooter
« Reply #8 on: January 17, 2011, 11:53:52 PM »
The liberal whack-job James Eric Fuller, 63, who was shot in the knee by the Arizona shooter
then went on tirade this past Saturday and was carted away for a psychiatric exam after disrupting
the town-hall meeting by taking a photo of Tucson Tea Party co-founder Trent Humphries and shouting,
"You're dead!"

Whack-job Demorcrat Fuller had told The Post on Friday, the day before his arrest, that
top Republican figures should be tortured -- and their ears severed. "There would be torture
and then an ear necklace, with [Minnesota US Rep.] Michelle Bachmann and Sarah Palin's ears
toward the end, because they're small, female ears, and then Limbaugh, Hannity and the biggest
ears of all, Cheney's, in the center,".


http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/docs_upgrade_gabby_condition_LZ3Z2FWj75oEr26HpCeAdI

Likely he was just overdosed on corn syrup sweeteners from soft drinks. He will be OK once he gets off the soft-drinks.

Kramer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5762
  • Repeal ObamaCare
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11139
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberalism Created the AZ Shooter
« Reply #10 on: January 19, 2011, 02:40:46 AM »
We could all say just as easily that the Democrats, the left is responsible for Tucson. 

We could say it. We didn't.  But we could. 

How?  Very simple. 

The left -- which continues to agitate, abuse, punish, name-call, whatever -- create an environment in which the individual is smothered. They treat people, individuals, as worthless. They come up with these conspiracy theories that Bush knew about 9/11.  Imagine yourself wandering aimlessly through the murk as a disturbed young man, you see one of your cities practically blown off the map and then you go out and watch a movie by Michael Moore and you listen to Democrats and you read websites -- and you watch movies, documentaries --about how Bush was behind it.  What do you think it's gonna do to an already disturbed mind?

And who did all that?  Who plants ideas like these in people's heads?  Bush knew of 9/11?  What kind of a mass murderer does that make Bush?  And don't forget, 35% of the Democrats in this country in a poll say they thought so, that Bush knew about it.  That means that by extension, Bush knew about it and didn't do anything to stop it. Therefore he is complicit.  The left is constantly telling anybody who will listen how rotten this country is, how rotten we are, how rotten the nation is, how unfair and unjust our economic system is.  They create this environment of pessimism, self-hate, and desperation.  They tell victims -- and they try to make as many people victims as possible by putting them in groups of victims.

They tell these people that they've got no chance in this unjust and unfair country.  "If you're Hispanic, you got no chance.  If you're African-American, you got no chance.  If you're a woman and African-American, you are doomed! You have no chance.  The only out for you is the military, and if you do that, you're stupid, but you really can't be blamed because this economy was so destroyed by George W. Bush, you have no future."  What is this going to do to people?  And this went on for eight years.  And before Clinton got to ten it went on for 16 or 12 years, during Reagan and the first term of Bush.  This has been a constant refrain: Unjust, unfair America is.

And now, as though to put an exclamation point on it, we got a president who runs around the world basically affirming this all by apologizing for it to anybody who will listen.  So you take some uneducated, ill-informed, mal-informed, disturbed young people, and you subject them to this stuff: Lying propaganda, movies, documentaries, who knows what the hell else, political speeches.  Sure, we could sit here and blame the left for this.  We could say they've got blood on their hands, that they create this kinda climate.  Because the Democrats, the left in this country, they turn citizen against citizen.

They want people to hate each other over wealth or race, gender, sexual orientation, or whatever.  They love talking about hate speech! They love talking about hate.  They want people to hate each other.  It's a distraction to boot.  You get men and women at war against each other, they're distracted.  You get blacks and whites at war with each other, they're distracted.  No matter what war you set up, it equals a distraction while the left marches on down the highway of socialism.  How can you be a liberal and be proud of yourself when you're told you don't sacrifice enough for the state?  We've heard that refrain, too. 

"The American people have not been asked to sacrifice during the Iraq war! We have not been asked to sacrifice," meaning we're not paying enough taxes.  Or your ancestors committed some horrible offense. Or conversely, if you're not able to succeed it's because of the Founders who were inherently racism, racist; or it's the unfair unjustness of capitalism.  Or basically a system built to deny you your just rewards -- and other than that, you've gotta find a way to get your "benefits," because country is stacked against you. This is the message of the Democrat Party every day, and it is ratcheted up during every election.

This is the message.  So who is it that is creating the message of desperation and despair and pessimism playing on fears and weaknesses?  It is them.  It isn't us.  We're the ones who are optimistic!  We continue to tell people this country provides excellent opportunity for anybody who wants to seek it, whatever ambition level you have.  We are warning people that that magic, that this wealth of opportunity, is threatened by the current regime and its socialist policies --and we threaten that because we want people to oppose it because our warnings are rooted in love.  Love of country, love of this nation's history, love of its potential, and love of its existence. Love of its future. 

And there isn't any of that on the left.  This stuff needs to be turned around on these people.  If you are a victim, and you have been victimized by other citizens or society generally, as the left preaches, are you not more likely to become violent?  They tell you that the deck is stacked against you, that the rich are taking everything from you, or that the Republicans want to kick you outta your house and take away your Social Security, or the Republicans want you to die, or their oil companies want you to go broke, or what have you? What are you gonna be prone to do here after a lifetime of hearing this stuff? 

Big Oil, Big Pharma, Big This, Big That, Big Insurance.  Every American institution that exists, according to the Democrats, is out to veritably kill you at one point or another.  If you were told that you are put upon by the system, that you have no hope unless society is transformed and made more just, unless there is fairness -- are you not more likely to become violent? If you're told every day that your future doesn't exist, that it's been robbed and stolen from you already, what are you gonna do -- particularly if you have (sigh), you know, mental disturbance going into this all this? 

You're told the rich are ripping you off.  If not for them, you would be living well.  If not for them, you'd have the boat and you'd have a house on the beach and you'd have three cars.  Are you not at least gonna be resentful?  And don't forget this is not something they say now and then.  It's every day.  It is their platform.  If you're told that America is a racist nation and there's nothing you can do about it, are you gonna get kicked off and form the New Black Panthers, maybe, and try to get in the way of people electing people that you oppose? 

Who knows? Anything's possible when that's the message.  When you got community organizers like Obama running around agitating on all this stuff, on street corners every day in urban areas of this country, what the hell do you expect to happen?  And they blame us.  Turn it around on them, folks, damn it.  They're the ones this create climates of hate, negativism, pessimism, desperation. "All is lost," despair, they create it.  That's how they benefit.  They profit from all that.
 
Here's how it works.  Minor player in the big scheme of things, but still, this is how it works.  This is yesterday, Megyn Kelly on America Live, Fox News Channel, talking with Alan Colmes.  And Megyn Kelly said, "I assume you're not a huge Rush Limbaugh fan."

COLMES:  Not only am I not a huge Rush Limbaugh fan, he's politicized it and he's (crosstalk) been decrying others as politicizing it.

KELLY: Okay, but let me ask you...

COLMES:  He should be ashamed of what he's been saying. 

KELLY: Let me ask you something?

COLMES: He blamed it on the Democratic Party and said the Democratic Party is protecting this guy Jared Lee Loughner.

KELLY: But - but...

COLMES:  That's ridiculous too.

KELLY: But he was attacked first. (crosstalk) He was attacked first.

COLMES:  Aw, poor baby.

KELLY:  Well listen, Alan, I'm just saying...

COLMES:  I'm just saying he had no business blaming the Democratic Party. He was way out of line on this.

KELLY: Obviously there was one person to blame for this and it was Jared Lee Loughner.

COLMES:  Yeah, absolutely.

KELLY: But I was on the air on Saturday night. There were other people on the air on Saturday night. This was hours...

COLMES:  Yeah.

KELLY: ...after the shooting took place, who were already blaming this on the right.

COLMES:  Limbaugh immediately lashed out against liberals in the Democratic Party. Something he should not have done.

KELLY:  He was attacked and blamed.

COLMES:  That's irrelevant. (crosstalk)

KELLY: No one had been attacking...

COLMES:  That does not excuse the things he said.

RUSH:  That's irrelevant, that's no excuse.  I didn't say anything until Monday on this.  But this is how it works.  Colmes gets the memo like all the rest of them do and the theme is that we're outta line, we're way outta line to defend ourselves.  And when we illustrate the absurdity of it by being absurd, they fall for it.  I knew that'd get 'em.  That was the Media Tweak of the Day, and it worked.  It was all over that Mediaite site.  I said, "No wonder the guy's smiling in his mug shot.  You would be, too, if you know the whole Democrat Party was trying to find somebody other than you to blame."  I mean there's a major political party in this country that's got your back.  You pulled the trigger, and they're out there trying to blame anybody but you.  No wonder the guy's smiling.  You can always tell when what works really gets under their skin, because then they run around and react to it and say, "That's out of line to defend himself, the poor baby, he can't handle being accused of murder, grow up."  Colmes has suggested in the past, by the way, that Sarah Palin caused her child to have Down syndrome because she was not careful enough in her prenatal care.  Colmes has said that.   
 
RUSH:  In the first hour of this program, I made some observations, ladies and gentlemen, that if you are a weak individual, questionable character, dubious mental capabilities, and if every day you are told how unfair and unjust your country is and how you are responsible for destroying the planet unless you do X. If you are told you haven't got a chance in this country because of racism, bigotry, homophobia, whatever it is, sexism, if you've been told that you've got nowhere to go because you're African-American or Hispanic and the deck is stacked against you in an unfair country, what would you do if you're told this every day by people you vote for, by people you support?  If the movies you go see tell you that your government was behind the downing of the trade center and the Pentagon in 9/11, as the move Zeitgeist did, a documentary. If you were told by Michael Moore that all of this was done on purpose, if you're told that the rich have taken what's rightfully yours, if you're bombarded with this every day as part of a political message, what would you be capable of doing? 

What might it drive you to do?  I mean we could just as easily say that the left is responsible for Tucson and events like Tucson because it is the left which routinely, regularly, continually agitates, abuses, punishes, fines, name calls.  The left creates this environment in which the individual is smothered, treated as worthless and degraded. The left is constantly telling us how horrible we are, how horrible our country is.  The left's leader runs around the world apologizing for this country, how unfair and unjust our economic system is; how our major corporations are out to kill you, to screw you, to rip you off.  They create this environment of pessimism, of self-hate and loathing, desperation.  They turn citizen against citizen, blacks against whites, men against women, Hispanics against whoever, you name it. People are constantly at war with each other.  How can you been proud of yourself when you're told you don't sacrifice enough for your state, you're not paying enough taxes, you're not giving enough to the cause or that your ancestors committed some horrible offense. Or, if you're unable to succeed, it's because of the Founders and the inherent racism and unfairness of your culture and our Constitution, or capitalism. 

You can't get into the university you want because the system is rigged, a system that has been built to deny you what's rightfully yours.  If you're told this every day -- and you are, this is the Democrat Party message, it has been for as long as I've been alive.  Who is it creating this sense of desperation, despair, and pessimism?  Who is it playing on fears and weaknesses?  Who is it that constantly parades these victims before Senate and congressional committees?  It's the Democrat Party, ladies and gentlemen.  So what have you got when a climate like this exists, and then you get Algore producing a movie lying to people about the world being destroyed?  Fake Photoshopped pictures in movies about ice floes melting, whole glaciers melting, the eastern coast of the country being flooded unless you drive some claptrap, piece-of-junk car that you really don't want.  But it's a status symbol, so you go get one. 

You are inspired to hate anybody that does any better than you are, and you are told that when those people are punished, that's your reward, not when you do better, but when those people are punished, that's your reward, that's when things are being equal, and the Democrat Party is gonna make sure that everybody who's guilty of doing better than you are pays the price one way or the other.  So what are you inspired to do?  You want everybody to get theirs; you want everybody to be gotten even with.  You take people who are unbalanced, weak, susceptible, impressionable and you bombard 'em with that message in the Democrat Party and their willing accomplices in the media every day, and what the hell kind of person or people are you going to create running around out there?  Then you show 'em the Michael Moore movie or show 'em the Zeitgeist movie, their government led by a Republican lied, took us into war in Afghanistan, lied to take us into war in Iraq, lied about weapons of mass destruction, lied about being responsible for 9/11, purposely wired those buildings to blow up and blamed it on some innocent Muslims, what are you gonna think?  Are you not gonna run around confused and filled with hatred? 

Isn't the job of the community organizer to tell people they don't have a chance?  Isn't the job of a community organizer to say you're screwed, but not for long if you support me 'cause we're gonna get even with these people?  How we gonna do it?  We're gonna make sure everybody's as miserable as you are and we're gonna call that fairness.  So here's just the latest example.  And this is from our beloved French News Agency: "World is 'One Poor Harvest' From Chaos, New Book Warns."  Okay, now imagine yourself.  You're a Jared Loughner or one degree of that or another. You're unstable. You're weak.  You can't find success outside a Powerball, and even that has eluded you.  It's cold out there, you drive a dented rat trap car, no girl will have anything to do with you, your only fun is video games, and even those have become boring.  Blockbuster shut down, they don't sill videocassettes anymore, and you don't have a DVD player because the rich stole the money that you were gonna take to buy one. 

And then all of a sudden you get up and you read that mankind has been pushed to the brink of collapse by bleeding water aquifers dry and overplowing land to feed people.  "In his new book 'World on the Edge,' released this week, Lester Brown, well known environmentalist, says mankind has pushed civilization to the brink of collapse by bleeding aquifers dry and overflowing land to feed an ever-growing population, while overloading the atmosphere with carbon dioxide.  If we continue to sap Earth's natural resources, 'civilizational collapse is no longer a matter of whether but when.'"  Well, what are you gonna do?  The world's already stacked against you.  This country's already made it impossible for you, and now there isn't gonna be enough food, either, because the filthy rich bankers and whoever else led by whatever Republican have bled the world dry are feeding themselves, enriching their corporate profits or whatever. 

"Brown, the founder of Worldwatch and the Earth Policy Institute, which both seek to create a sustainable society, told AFP. What distinguishes 'World on the Edge' from his dozens of other books is 'the sense of urgency,' Brown told AFP. 'Things could start unraveling at any time now and it's likely to start on the food front. We've got to get our act together quickly. We don't have generations or even decades -- we're one poor harvest away from chaos." Yeah, you remember when we were all just one paycheck away from being homeless back during the Reagan eighties?  We have been talking for decades about saving the planet, but the question now is, can we save civilization?  Well, what are you gonna do?  And this is a common refrain, one degree or another of this apocalyptic message, right out of the Democrat Party, the American left, the worldwide left playbook.  If you happen to be weak, unstable, mentally weird, who knows what you're doing in your basement, planning for the ultimate day when all this happens.  And who you gonna blame?  You gotta hold somebody accountable for this.  Cause every day you're told and you're given a list of names of why you haven't succeeded.  And it's everybody but you.  It's everybody else's fault that you are human debris.  And you gotta go out and you gotta punish whoever did this to you, and the Democrat Party has given you a list. 

So if the world is just one poor harvest away from starvation, maybe we ought to stop putting corn in our cars.  "What do you mean by that, Mr. Limbaugh, putting corn in our cars?"  Yes, Mr. New Castrati, it's called ethanol.  And the price of tacos and enchiladas and everything they eat down in Mexico has gone up sky-high, including where you eat, Mr. New Castrati, because corn, which we used to eat is now being put in cars to fuel them at no savings in any regard.  Lester Brown, the recipient of 26 honorary degrees, he holds a MacArthur fellowship, he has been described by the Washington Post as one of the world's most influential thinkers.  Well, obviously Jared Loughner has to have heard of him.  So this is just one example of my point.  "Food riots would erupt in low-income countries and 'with confidence in the world grain market shattered, the global economy could start to unravel,'" from one of the world's greatest thinkers. 

Hell, you don't even have to be unbalanced. Just say you're an average college student, skull full of mush; you've watched Gore's movie; you've read the stupid book; you believe all this garbage; you wear all the ribbons; you buy all the accessories to make yourself look like you care more than everybody else; you read this and what are you gonna do?  Well, you're gonna be motivated to go into journalism, for social justice.  Or become an aide in the Democrat Party or what have you. 
 
 
BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH:  And don't forget here, folks, the Discovery Channel Gunman. He was a global warmer.  You know that guy who took the building hostage? We know these stories drive people to insane acts.  I just got a note from a guy, "Shut up, Rush! You're depressing me.  You're making me feel like I gotta go out and shoot somebody."  Well, somebody already did!  Look at this.  This is from the Latin-American Herald Tribune, February 28th of last year. "Buenos Aires -- A 7-month-old baby survived alone for three days with a bullet wound in its chest beside the bodies of its parents and brother, who died in an apparent suicide pact brought on by the couple's terror of global warming..."

They believed they were causing global warming, so they killed their two kids and then themselves! "The cops found a letter on the table alluding to the couple?s worry about global warming and their anger at the government?s lack of interest in the matter." So, folks, if you're disturbed, if you're not all there and you believe all this tripe... They don't even have to be all disturbed.  You just hear it every day from sources that everybody thinks never lie to you.  Why would your government lie to you? A lot of people have that view: The government would never lie to 'em.  "It may be wrong, but it'd never lie to us." 

You have all these respected people winning Nobel Prizes saying all of this: The UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; the former vice president of the United States, Algore. All these wonderful people say it.  Bill Clinton is running around talking about it. The president of the United States, Barack Obama, is promising to lower the sea levels.  Yeah, we've had stories saying, "It's too late! No matter what we do, we can't stop this."  Well, if that's the case, I've always said, maybe we're not causing it."  At the trial of the gunman, the Discovery Channel hostage-taker, "The Gazette of Montgomery County reported, Lee said he began working to save the planet after being laid off from his job in San Diego.

"He said he was inspired by 'Ishmael,' a novel by environmentalist Daniel Quinn, and by former Vice President Al Gore's documentary 'An Inconvenient Truth,'" uh, lie. "'I want Discovery Communications to broadcast on their channels to the world their new program lineup and I want proof they are doing so,' he wrote. 'I want the new shows started by asking the public for inventive solution ideas to save the planet and the remaining wildlife on it.'" This was the kook that took hostages at the Discovery Channel building in Maryland.  So, look, throw this right back on them. It's why I say, "You want to clean up the world? You want to make it a safer place? Take guns away from liberals. Take computers and keyboards and typewriters away from their writers."  Those two things alone, imagine how much more peaceful daily life would be!

[rl]
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberalism Created the AZ Shooter
« Reply #11 on: January 19, 2011, 02:56:49 AM »
Would these quotes be 'vitriolic rhetoric'?
Posted: January 13, 2011

Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik took time from gathering the facts about the Tucson, Ariz., shooting to denounce the "vitriolic rhetoric" that he claims played a role in the carnage. He insisted, without any evidence, that Democratic Rep. Gabrielle Giffords' support for Obamacare helped trigger the shooter's wrath, resulting in six dead and 14 wounded, including Rep. Giffords, who was shot point-blank in the head.

"I think it's time as a country," said Dupnik, "that we ... do a little soul-searching, because I think it's the vitriolic rhetoric that we hear day in and day out from people in the radio business and some people in the TV business, and what we see on TV and how our youngsters are being raised, that this has not become the nice United States of America that most of us grew up in, and I think it's time that we do the soul-searching."

Would the "vitriolic rhetoric" requiring "soul-searching" include Dupnik's pronouncements that the popular Arizona immigration law is "stupid" and "disgusting" and "racist"?

Would the "vitriolic rhetoric" include former President Jimmy Carter's ugly assertion that "an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man, that he's African-American"?

Would it include former Democratic National Chairman Howard Dean's description of the contest between Democrats and Republicans as "a struggle between good and evil ? and we're the good"?

Would it include Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's characterization of then-President George W. Bush as "a loser and a liar"?

Would it include Democratic Sen. Debbie Stabenow's denunciation of President Bush as "dangerously incompetent"?

Would it include the late Democratic Sen. Ted Kennedy's assertion that the Bush administration fabricated a case for war in Iraq, or, as Kennedy put it, "week after week after week, we were told lie after lie after lie"?

Would the "vitriolic rhetoric" include Democratic Rep. Charlie Rangel's referring to Bush as "our Bull Connor," the infamous Southern lawman who, in the 1960s, turned police dogs and water hoses on black civil-rights protesters?

Would it include the declaration by Comedy Central's Jon Stewart ? a man astonishingly described as a modern Edward R. Murrow ? that former President Harry Truman was "a war criminal"?

Would it include then-presidential candidate Barack Obama's declaration made at a fundraiser that "if they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun"?

Would it include the false accusation that the N-word was yelled at black congressmen as they walked across the Capitol grounds, a still unproven charge stated as fact numerous times by the "mainstream" media?

Would it include Hillary Clinton's telling a black audience that the then-Republican majority Congress was "run like a plantation"?

Would it include Democratic Sen. John Kerry's demonstrably false claim that he lost the 2004 presidential election because Ohio was "stolen"?

Would it include the Rev. Al Sharpton, who, long before meeting with the FCC and demanding broadcasting decency standards, called the then mayor of New York a "nigger whore"?

Would it include the chairwoman of the California chapter of NOW who, after the female Republican gubernatorial candidate was called a "whore," said that yes, "Meg Whitman could be described as 'a political whore'"?

Would it include then-Rep. Diane Watson, D-Calif., who attacked a black political opponent: "He's married to a white woman. He wants to be white. He wants a colorless society. He has no ethnic pride. He doesn't want to be black. I said that"?

Would it include the way then-President Bill Clinton, according to aide Dick Morris, described his 1996 Republican opponent: "Bob Dole is not a nice man. Bob Dole is evil. The things he wants to do to children are evil. The things he wants to do to poor people and old people and sick people are evil. Let's get that straight"?

Would it include the editor of Bartlett's Familiar Quotations who, in explaining why Ronald Reagan had so few entries, said, "I'm not going to disguise the fact that I despise Ronald Reagan"?

Would it include the British director who made an assassination-of-President-Bush "documentary" called "Death of a President"? Or the British columnist who reviewed it and said, "You will never, ever be able to overestimate the degree to which the British people loathe George Bush. It will be a free round of drinks in every pub for the person who plays the assassin"?

Would it include the unhinged MSNBC host Ed Schultz, who, days before the Tucson shooting, said: "This is an ideological war. ... I will fight these bastards every night at 6 o'clock because I know what they're up against. I know what they want to do. They want to take down American workers. ... They want to destroy the American dream, concentrate the wealth to the top and control minorities"?

Would the "vitriolic rhetoric" include ... oh, never mind.



"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle