Author Topic: The "Fairness" Doctrine  (Read 2096 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The "Fairness" Doctrine
« Reply #15 on: August 02, 2007, 05:07:34 PM »
Global warming is an established fact to anyone who is actually a scientist

While that statement is true, the usual follow up statement ("and it's mostly caused by humans") is not an established fact.
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)

Richpo64

  • Guest
Re: The "Fairness" Doctrine
« Reply #16 on: August 02, 2007, 06:17:10 PM »
>>But is that what Juniorbush advocates? Noooooooo. He just wants to bad [ban] FEDERAL funding. Lunacy.<<

Why?

If fetal stem cell research is the answer (which of course it isn't), why is federal money required?

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The "Fairness" Doctrine
« Reply #17 on: August 02, 2007, 08:44:15 PM »


If fetal stem cell research is the answer (which of course it isn't), why is federal money required?

It is not "the answer" (as I said, ratwingers are amazingly simplistic), it is AN answer. People live longer as a rssult of this research. They could live better. Organs could be grown for transplanting. Every day, people die because there are not enough transplants.

99% of the frozen embryos proposed to be used are going to be discarded, anyway.
Why not use them to prolong life? What do you have against living longer? It could even be YOU. Is it not in the interests of the people of the US that YOU live better and longer?


If it is  immoral to use these embryos and therefore should not be done under any circumstances, then it should be banned entirely,. as murder is banned.

If it isn't, then prolonging the productive life of the citizens is a good thing, good for all of us. This whose lives are prolonged will work harder for their bosses, will support their families longer, and will pay taxes. This is a matter of the common good.

It certainly is better for the common good than Ted Steven's "Bridge to Nowhere". It is certainly better than the millions the Juniorbushies are pissing away in Iraq by the hour, building power plants that are blown up before they are finished.

Jesus cured about a dozen lepers. There were lepers all over the place in his time. When was the last time you saw a leper?
It wasn't Jesus that stopped leprosy. It was medical research.

How many years jailtime would you give a woman that had an abortion, if abortions were banned? C'mon now, answer the question.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The "Fairness" Doctrine
« Reply #18 on: August 02, 2007, 11:31:59 PM »
Why do you think leftwing talk radio has failed?


The main stream media competes with it.

On the right the market is still underserved.

Richpo64

  • Guest
Re: The "Fairness" Doctrine
« Reply #19 on: August 03, 2007, 12:11:09 PM »
>>How many years jailtime would you give a woman that had an abortion, if abortions were banned? C'mon now, answer the question.<<

None.

The doctor who performed it however, would have his license taken away and do some time. How much? Pick a number.

As for the rest of your post, it's obvious you have no idea what you're talking about. You're lacking in facts and what you consider to be facts in just another example of the imaginary world liberal/communists live in.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The "Fairness" Doctrine
« Reply #20 on: August 03, 2007, 12:31:23 PM »


People live longer as a rssult of this research.


Who has?

This is an expectation , if there were an expectation that vivisection would cause people to live longer would you be for it?