Author Topic: The Sandy Berger Experiment  (Read 4439 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Sandy Berger Experiment
« Reply #15 on: January 04, 2007, 02:03:41 PM »
Quote
...1) a blow job is a federal case & worthy of impeachmen t2) there were WMD's in Iraq 3) there are ties to Al Quaeda in Iraq 4) Geo W Bush is sane ad infinitum & ad nauseum.


Number one. No one ever Charged Bill Clinton with any charges for anything he ever did with Monica Lewinski( not counting the knot on his head that Hillary gave him)


Number two, Saddam Hussein was once the proud proprieter of  the worlds third largest collection of WMD, this is a fact that has changed , but we didn't know exactly when it chnged or exactly how it changed we only know that two Bushes forced this change to happen. Do you really know where all that stuff is now?

Number three, intercepted letters from Al Queda leadership in Iraq a few months ago estimated Al Queda deaths in Iraq to be 4000 , this has got to be a low ball estimate. And of course only a fraction of the number of innocents killed by Al Queda.

Number Four , are you an authority on insanity?



BTW are you changeing the subject because you know that Clinton has something worse to hide than we know yet of , or are you changeing the subject because you just think it likely that Clinton has some worse secrets than we know yet?

Sandy Burger went into the Document store to hide something , he was so desprate he was stuffing these documents into his pants , Imagine for yourself how you would feel about it , if Condeleeza  Rice had been caught doing something like this.

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Sandy Berger Experiment
« Reply #16 on: January 04, 2007, 02:08:53 PM »
 This whole thread sucks donkeyhonks bigtime, RR.
« Last Edit: January 04, 2007, 02:14:59 PM by Xavier_Onassis »
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Brassmask

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2600
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Sandy Berger Experiment
« Reply #17 on: January 04, 2007, 02:53:48 PM »
Wasn't Bush "president" when Sandy Berger stole those documents?


Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Sandy Berger Experiment
« Reply #18 on: January 04, 2007, 03:02:32 PM »
Wasn't Bush "president" when Sandy Berger stole those documents?

Yeah, that's why he got caught.
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)

Mucho

  • Guest
Re: The Sandy Berger Experiment
« Reply #19 on: January 04, 2007, 03:11:16 PM »
, Imagine for yourself how you would feel about it , if Condeleeza  Rice had been caught doing something like this.

I got somethin I would  like to stick in Condi's pants right here.



She might not be such an uptight bitch then.

Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Sandy Berger Experiment
« Reply #20 on: January 04, 2007, 03:15:13 PM »
Your boyfriend, Knutty?
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Sandy Berger Experiment
« Reply #21 on: January 04, 2007, 04:24:12 PM »
, Imagine for yourself how you would feel about it , if Condeleeza  Rice had been caught doing something like this.

I got somethin I would  like to stick in Condi's pants right here.



She might not be such an uptight bitch then.


In the spirit of Bi-Partinship , would you reccomend the same treatment for Sandy Berger now?

Mucho

  • Guest
Re: The Sandy Berger Experiment
« Reply #22 on: January 04, 2007, 05:27:13 PM »


In the spirit of Bi-Partinship , would you reccomend the same treatment for Sandy Berger now?
[/quote]

Why not? It is about as silly and unimportant as this whole ridiculous thread .