"We do not oppose schoolteachers at all. We also do not oppose public education."
But, with all due respect, Pooch, you have mentioned school teachers in your post and not favorably.
Where? I have no problem with school teachers at all. Had I not joined the Army I intended to become a music teacher myself. I am going to have to ask you to provide an example of an unfavorable comment about schoolteachers that I made. I would be very surprised if I have done so. Now I have often mentioned teacher's UNIONS as a problem, and I have probably cited specific examples of INCOMPETENT teachers. Yes, I object to both. But schoolteachers in general I have a great deal of respect for. A competent teacher is a valuable asset and a gifted teacher is a treasure.
The good teachers who work hard, learn new methods, provide the best for kids are thrown into the mix of "bad teachers", because of test scores. I really can not understand why the public has come to the conclusion that if a school produces low test scores, that that equates to bad teachers.
For the same reason that a losing baseball team equates to bad players. It's probably true that in sports more emphasis is placed on dumping the manager because it is easier to do that than dump a lot of overpaid players, but the Orioles suck right now because the players suck. Earl Weaver wouldn't have been the superstar manager he was without Brooks and Frank Robinson, Jim Palmer, Dave McNally, Mike Cuellar and that crowd. And he couldn't take this latest bunch above third place in his best season. (Sorry, sad baseball rant digression.) Teachers are the front line. If they are not able to produce results, they are pretty much accountable. I'll grant that poor adminsitrators, conflicting requirements, ESL challenges and other such issues need to be factored into the mix, but the bottom line is that - all other things being equal - the teachers who produce should be better paid and retained and those who do not should be paid less or replaced. Like I said, every other industry does it that way.
I say damn the government for imposing such constraints on schools...and then bashing teachers. Leave it to mainstream media for spreading such streams of thought. It leaves out so much that is qualityt, and perpetuates negative thinking.....and is plain jus NO FAIR.
What is wrong with requiring minimum achievement levels? I agree that we need to have things like music, art and athletics in our schools to round out an education. But the bottom line is that a person who can't read is not very likely to grasp the concept of metaphor in literature. A person who can't do basic math is not going to be able to analyze harmony. A person who can't grasp the basic concepts of English grammar is going to have a tough time learning a foreign language. And in the end, as important as cultural training and other such quality of life issues are, I can't spend a lot of time appreciating the use of directional force in a painting if I am busy working twelve hour shifts at a low paying job because I lack basic literacy.
Ironically, my posts from yesterday did seem to imply similar sentiments......that there are bound to be bad teachers in the home schooling arena. I suppose I am doing the same thing to make a point.
But that is a perfectly rational point. There ARE going to be lousy home teachers, and they should be held just as accountable as any other teacher.
I have yet to come in contact with such incompetence and failure as has been mentioned here on this board. I suppose in years to come there might just be a resistence against private schools or home schooling, but for now, public schools are suffering unjustly, I feel.
Oh, I have. Aside from the aforementioned Georgia school (in Augusta. They were unbelievable.) I have had some teachers in my life who had no business in the field. My US History teacher in High School and my Algebra teacher in Jr High come to mind. Cedar stump dumb. Rock dumb. Can't spell your name dumb. But I was fortunate to have a geography teacher in the 10th Grade who was shocked to find that all the kids from our Jr High knew virtually nothing about Algebra and did double duty teaching us Algebra as we went along. She and I never got along, because she was a no-nonsense type and I was class clown, but in retrospect she was a great teacher. I had her again in the 12th and she pointedly asked me to transfer on the first day. I didn't and we got along for the rest of that year. And I had some teachers who I would love to meet today and give some kind of award. My Jr High Biology teacher, my College English Comp instructor, my third-grade teacher who treated me like gold, not to mention a host of music teachers. But yeah, I've seen some incredible incompetence. It's out there.
It's a shame that people never offer what can be done to improve a system for those kids who can not afford the luxury of private schooling or home schooling.
Well, that's what standardized testing is supposed to do. It makes sure kids are learning what they ought to be.
Springing forward to another day of facilitating and providing valuable learning possibilities for children who wouldn't get it at home, that's for sure.
Well, that begs the question, but since I don't know the parents involved you may be right.