Author Topic: The Age of Celebrity Journalists  (Read 760 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MissusDe

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 221
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
The Age of Celebrity Journalists
« on: October 02, 2008, 09:59:55 PM »
Ifill courts a second, lesser, conflict of interest tonight. Millions of viewers will be tuning in. That's millions of potential book buyers. Ifill's not a household name. Tonight is a marketing opportunity to raise her profile and be a part of the Election 2008 story. With a book due in January, there's a natural temptation to make a star turn of her own. I can certainly think of certain TV journalists/personalities who would succumb.

That's not to say that journalists who cover elections shouldn't write books on elections. But should they be moderating televised debates while writing said books? Maybe I'm too suspicious. But one can't help but suspect that Ms. Ifill was on some level aware of the problem. As we've learned, she didn't take it upon herself to inform the commission of her literary efforts and let the chips fall where they may.

Update: I just heard Chris Wallace suggest that she should disclose to viewers that she has a book coming out on Obama. Millions of free advertising dollars dressed up in the guise of "journalistic integrity"? If I were her publicist, I'd tell her to go for it!: "I'm Gwen Ifill of PBS.  In the interest of full disclosure, I want to alert viewers that I have a book coming out on the stunning rise of Barack Obama due in bookstores January 20th, Inauguration Day. It's also available right now on pre-sale at Amazon.com."

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NThlODkzNGI5YjdjMzNiYjk4Njc4NDhhMTc0Y2JiZDE=

hnumpah

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
  • You have another think coming. Use it.
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Age of Celebrity Journalists
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2008, 11:58:21 PM »
Quote
As we've learned, she didn't take it upon herself to inform the commission of her literary efforts and let the chips fall where they may.

As I've pointed out, we've also learned the information was out there, if only the staffers who organized the debate for the Republican side had looked. So are they stupid, or did they figure it wouldn't matter?

No need for her to plug her book before, during or after the debate tonight - alll the Republican handwringing this week has given her all the free publicity she needs.
"I love WikiLeaks." - Donald Trump, October 2016

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Age of Celebrity Journalists
« Reply #2 on: October 03, 2008, 12:15:18 AM »
No need for her to plug her book before, during or after the debate tonight - alll the Republican handwringing this week has given her all the free publicity she needs.

I agree with that 100%.

She was impartial and did an acceptable, allbeit somewhat wimpy job. Only once did she tell Plain that she didn't answer a question. Neither of them answered many questions very clearly. It seems that they are depending on the post commenterists to analyze their denials and accusations.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."