Author Topic: Steyn on Palin  (Read 5597 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MissusDe

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 221
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Steyn on Palin
« on: October 05, 2008, 03:01:34 AM »
With a Wink and a Smile
A citizen-politician runs for veep.

By Mark Steyn


Back in February, several political lifetimes ago, I was on the radio with Laura Ingraham and she played Stevie Wonder?s campaign song for Barack Obama, whose lyric, in its entirety, runs:

    Ba-rack O-ba-ma
    Ba-a-rack O-ba-a-ma
    Ba-ra-ack Obama-a...


(Repeat until coronation.)

And Laura and I had a good laugh about it, until it occurred to me that, in politics as in pop, the tune is more important than the words. A guy can run for president with all the right lyrics ? on the war, the economy, the social issues ? but what matters is whether people respond to the underlying music: not what he?s saying, but how he?s saying it. At the time, I was reflecting on Mitt Romney: The song looked great on paper, but when he stuck it on the stand and started to warble it never quite soared.

That?s where Sarah Palin scored in the vice-presidential showdown. A lot of the grandees in the post-debate analysis reviewed the lyrics and missed the music. Whereas, I would wager, a big chunk of uncommitted voters out in TV land listened to Governor Palin, and liked the tune they were hearing. If you?re one of those coastal feminists who despise Alaska?s sweetheart as a chillbilly breeder whose knowledge of foreign policy is as full of holes as the last moose to make the mistake of strolling past her deck, Thursday night?s folksy performance isn?t going to change your view. But, if your contempt for her wasn?t already chiseled in granite, she came over as genuine, confident ?and different. Change you can believe in, to coin a phrase.

I was a bit alarmed at first. I hadn?t seen her for awhile, not since the halfwits at the McCain campaign walled her up in the witness protection program and permitted visitations only by selected poobahs of the Metamucil networks. When she walked out on stage, her famous reach-for-the-skies up-do seemed a bit subdued and earthbound, like a low-budget remake of the famous scene in There?s Something About Mary. Then she started speaking. The lyrics were workmanlike, but the music was effective. I have a couple of favorite snapshots from the evening. One was when Governor Sarah Palin said that John McCain hadn?t required her to check her principles at the door, and she still believed in drilling in ANWR and she was hoping to bring him round on that. And then she grinned and gave a mischievous wink into the camera, and to the nation.

?Don?t sell the American people short,? said Obama honcho David Axelrod. ?They need more than a wink and a smile.? Okay, so how about this? Joe Biden mocked the McCain campaign?s energy policy as ?Drill, drill, drill?, and the governor came back to correct the line: ?It?s not ?Drill, drill, drill?,? she grinned. ?It?s ?Drill, baby, drill!??

To be sure, if you listened to the lyrics ? the policy, the facts, the platform ? they weren?t always what you wanted to hear. Governor Palin?s riff on education quickly descended into a rote call for more spending, even though America already spends more per pupil than any advanced nation other than Switzerland and has less to show for it. And more than once you pined for a more devastating putdown: The Obama ?plan? to ?end? the war was, more precisely, a plan to lose the war, and in a healthy political culture would disqualify him from serious contention. If I?d been in charge of ?coaching? Governor Palin, I?d take her out back, and set up the various Obama policy platforms as cardboard elk, lurking in the protective undergrowth of the mainstream media but still eminently hittable to a crack shot.

By contrast, Senator Biden was glib and fluent and in command of the facts ? if by ?in command of the facts? you mean ?talks complete blithering balderdash and hogwash.? He flatly declared that Obama never said he would meet Ahmadinejad without preconditions. But, on Debate Night, the official Obama website was still boasting that he would meet Ahmadinejad ?without preconditions?. He said America spends more in a month in Iraq than it?s spent in seven years in Afghanistan. Er, America has spent over $700 billion in Afghanistan since 2001. It?s spending about $10 billion a month in Iraq. But no matter. To demonstrate his command of the ?facts?, Senator Biden sportingly offered up his own instant replays:

?My friend John McCain voted 422 times against tax cuts for the middle classes. Let me repeat that so the American people are clear on this. My friend John McCain voted 673 times against tax cuts for the middle classes.?

The problem was that it all sounded drearily senatorial. Mention any global crisis ? civil war in Bosnia, genocide in Darfur, Russian aggression in Georgia, the lack of five-star restaurants in Wales ? and Biden has been there, usually within the last two weeks, and always at public expense. What the American taxpayer gets for the Emir of Delaware?s frequent-flyer miles is harder to discern. Biden was doing his best to turn in a decent karaoke version of Lloyd Bentsen, but, unfortunately, Governor Palin declined to play Dan Quayle. That left Joe sounding like an ancient pol being generically vice-presidential. Sarah, at her best, sounded like the citizen-politician this country?s Founders intended. She hasn?t voted 397 times against this or that in the U.S. Senate, because she?s been running a state, and a town, and a commercial fishing operation. She?s a doer, not a talker, which is why so many of my fellow professional talkers disdain her.

When Regular Joe Six-Pack Bluecollar Biden tried to match her on the Main Street cred, it rang slightly wacky. ?Look,? he said, ?All you have to do is go down Union Street with me in Wilmington or go to Katie?s Restaurant or walk into Home Depot with me, where I spend a lot of time.? Why? Is he moonlighting as a checkout clerk on the evening shift? Or is he stalking that nice lady in Lighting Fixtures? As for Katie?s Restaurant, ah, I?m sure it was grand but apparently it closed in 1990. In the Diner of the Mind, the refills are endless and Senator Joe is sitting shootin? the breeze over a cuppa joe with a couple other regular joes on adjoining stools while Betty-Jo, the sassy waitress who?s tough as nails but with a heart of gold, says Ol? Joe, the short-order cook who?s doing his Sloppy Joes just the way the Senator likes ?em, really appreciates the way that, despite 78 years in Washington, Joe Biden is still just the same regular Joe Six-Pack he was when he and Norman Rockwell first came in for a sarsaparilla all those years ago. But, alas, while he was jetting off for one-to-one talks with the Deputy Tourism Minister of Waziristan, the old neighborhood changed.

In a conventional presidential environment, Bidenesque fake authenticity would be enough. Up against Sarah Palin?s authentic authenticity, I?m not so sure. All I know is that the McCain campaign should have her out on the road and doing every interview she can over this final month. Oh, and send her snowmobiling hubby to Maine, which splits its electoral college votes. He?ll put their Second Congressional District back in the red camp, and the way things are looking that could be the 270th vote that saves McCain?s bacon.

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZmNjYTc3NzFiZGU1NjM2YmQ3NmMzNTM3NjJlNGMzMjU=

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Steyn on Palin
« Reply #1 on: October 05, 2008, 08:19:26 AM »
Hahahahahahaa!

Excelent!

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Steyn on Palin
« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2008, 11:48:03 AM »
The miracle of selective editing.  Left out, for example, was Biden's little zinger that Palin had left Wasilla $20 million in debt.

Biden didn't shine and Palin didn't self-destruct.  And, yeah, he's an old guy but guess what?  McCain's older.

I don't know why Steyn thinks that "drill baby drill" is any less moronic or offensive than "drill drill drill" unless he found more sexual innuendo in the former slogan, but maybe that's what Sarah was offering, on a purely subliminal level, of course.  She did say it with a pretty fetching smile, and she is still a very attractive woman.  "Drill, baby, drill," eh?  Why Sarah Palin, my gosh,how could you?

And how's this for being out of touch?

<<When Regular Joe Six-Pack Bluecollar Biden tried to match her on the Main Street cred, it rang slightly wacky. "Look," he said, "All you have to do is . . . walk into Home Depot with me, where I spend a lot of time."   Why? Is he moonlighting as a checkout clerk on the evening shift? Or is he stalking that nice lady in Lighting Fixtures?">>

Joe Biden doesn't own 8 homes with a household staff on an annual payroll over a quarter-million dollars.  Biden, one of the LEAST affluent Senators on Capitol Hill, owns ONE home and obviously does not and probably cannot afford to, call in a tradesman every time a toilet starts to gurgle or a light socket won't light up or some new shelving is needed or an eavestrough starts to leak.  The McCains obviously call in a contractor, Todd Palin and Joe Biden probably, as do I, have to spend some time in Home Depot.  Steyn, hilariously, can't think of any reason to spend a lot of time in Home Depot unless, of course, one is stalking one of the sales clerks.  And he thinks BIDEN "rang slightly wacky?"  Honestly.
« Last Edit: October 05, 2008, 11:55:04 AM by Michael Tee »

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Steyn on Palin
« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2008, 12:23:59 PM »
  And he thinks BIDEN "rang slightly wacky?"  Honestly.


Biden forgot who he was talking to .


Sara Palin struck no one as being out of touch with the common people .


Biden was strugglin to say that he was a good freind of Joe Six Pack , but trying to bounce it off of the Alaskan was whacky.

crocat

  • Guest
Re: Steyn on Palin
« Reply #4 on: October 05, 2008, 12:31:37 PM »
"My thoughts" qualified by the fact that in "my opinion” most political campaigns are run on BULLSHIT of the grandiose, emotion grabbing kind that appear to be a small expensive meal with much useless drizzle and garnish around the plate so that your eyes don't tell you that you will be starving in 30 minutes.

Palin came across as someone one we can “relate to,” in the masses.  She was refreshing and real, showing no sign of being a ball-busting bitch (that so many women with political ambition and power are hung with).  I don’t think that Hilary even managed that and I do believe that is Hilary had been the Dem. ticket this would have been an entirely different race.  Let’s not pretend that the Clinton’s are anything other than moderates.   It was easy for them to steal (votes) from both sides.

But we are not talking about a Clinton / McCain election so there is much less middle ground for middle ground people to hang their votes.  There are many factors that will be considered in this election but just looking at the minority issues.

Start with the obvious:

Obama is black (though barely and that could hurt him because there are many militant blacks that would consider him an “uncle Tom.”

Historically the Democrats have tried to get out the vote in the black non-voting areas.  They did this during the Obama/Clinton campaign...one can only tell Hilary that you live by the sword... but that is another issue.  My point is will these people come out and vote again?   Historically they have not. 

We cannot presume that this time they will not as we are in a huge economic downturn and there are a lot of hands out waiting for the government to come up with more programs to give them money and more government big sticks to punish business.

That said, let us not pretend that there are some who would just a soon not have a black president.   Oh, I know that many will scream racism but that is just passive aggressive tactics that try to bully people into being afraid to state their opinions.  I for one am not.  I do not wish to elect a President that will have so many hands to fill once he is elected.   People cried out in regards to George Bush’s religious base and what it would do to our freedoms.   I hope that the cry will be no less when one considers the cost of government intervention in the arena of hand out programs.  Part of my concern is that while the President of the United States wields a lot of power, it is the political machine that runs us over.

We cannot leave out the bleeding liberal entertainment community.   I have a real problem with those that are so rich choosing to ‘give the poor a fish rather than teach them how to fish’ mentality. 


Giving people “things” does not work... it doesn’t make them value the ‘thing’ or figure out how to get the ‘thing’ on their own.   It just instills a family / community ideology that someone should give it to them because they don’t have it.

The second obvious - Palin is a woman and a “Chillbilly” as the west coast liberals call her.  Not the minority of choice I am afraid.

While McCain has a lot of experience and has been very active in his government positions, he does not come across with much personality.   Though let me interject that watching Obama swagger and speak to the side of room rather than us is annoying to me.  I am concerned that McCain may end up being perceived as weak and frail.  Palin will do a lot for him in this arena.  I also think that her demeanor will get a lot of voters that are unsure about the rhetoric, i.e. it is over their heads, will tend to trust her.  This appears to be an option that few candidates have been able to present before and that is a person that comes across as ‘Jane average American.’  Before all of you naysayers get on your high horse about having someone with not much of a record in politics consider two things.   1. Obama hasn’t done much; and, 2. Those with lots of experience have not done such a great job either.

I enjoyed the debate between Biden and Palin.  I enjoyed that Biden came off rehearsed and threatened (women are the weaker sex) and how Palin came off as warm and inclusive and frankly quite charming.  I loved how the pundits proclaimed that she would not be able to speak based on the Couric interview.  My thoughts on Couric, is that she needs to go back to morning chatter or retire.  Why entertainers think that when they get wrinkles it grows a brain is beyond me.

Well I think I have ranted enough this morning.  I will apologize now if I seem to disappear into the woodwork again but lots of work tomorrow and then three days of ‘road trip’ for work.

Cro

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Steyn on Palin
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2008, 01:05:17 PM »
<<Biden was strugglin to say that he was a good freind of Joe Six Pack , but trying to bounce it off of the Alaskan was whacky.>>

You're right that Biden was awkward and not all that credible in trying to establish his Joe Six-Pack cred on the same stage as Palin, who did seem to be the more authentic article.

My point was that it was STEYN, not Biden, who came across as really, truly wacky when discussing Biden's time spent at Home Hardware.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Steyn on Palin
« Reply #6 on: October 05, 2008, 01:20:34 PM »
The second obvious - Palin is a woman and a “Chillbilly” as the west coast liberals call her.  Not the minority of choice I am afraid.



Women are not a minority at all , if a significant number of previously apathetic women vote because they like her , they may discover their majority status.

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Steyn on Palin
« Reply #7 on: October 05, 2008, 01:58:08 PM »
Women are not a minority of the voters.

But they do not vote as a bloc, and probably never will in the US.

They are a minority politically, because they are a minority of elected officials.

It is much more likely that they will be more on a par with men in this respect in Western Europe than in the US, because our culture is more fundie Christian. Americans read mysogonistic stuff in the Bible like Paul, Europeans don;lt believe it and ignore it, to a greater degree.

"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Steyn on Palin
« Reply #8 on: October 05, 2008, 03:35:36 PM »
Governor Palin's riff on education quickly descended into a rote call for more spending, even though America already spends more per pupil than any advanced nation other than Switzerland and has less to show for it. And more than once you pined for a more devastating putdown: The Obama "plan" to "end" the war was, more precisely, a plan to lose the war, and in a healthy political culture would disqualify him from serious contention

Why is this NOT being emphasized by the GOP?
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Steyn on Palin
« Reply #9 on: October 05, 2008, 07:10:21 PM »
Why is this NOT being emphasized by the GOP?

Perhaps they lack your towering intellect. You should join them. You would fit in just fine.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Steyn on Palin
« Reply #10 on: October 05, 2008, 07:13:29 PM »
Naaaaa......I don't drink the party talking point swill like some on the left
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

crocat

  • Guest
Re: Steyn on Palin
« Reply #11 on: October 05, 2008, 08:39:27 PM »
"Why is this NOT being emphasized by the GOP?"


Actually I think that McCain is trying to sell their own stuff and are trying to keep it about what he can do and not what Obama cannot.

I would love to see an election that people vote on what the person can do rather on that they have bought the other parties negativity.   Hell, I would be thrilled if people bothered to find out for themselves rather than just be lazy and vote because of what they heard on Letterman's Top 10 list.

I would prefer that at least half of the voters just stayed home because many are just too stupid or lazy to have a vote.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Steyn on Palin
« Reply #12 on: October 06, 2008, 02:51:33 AM »
And to be honest, Cro, I'd like to see that too.....a campaign on why you should vote for me vs why you you shouldn't vote for him/her.  Yet in today's day and age of "gotcha" politics, and 3 nanosecond attention span, just barely long enough for folks who don't spend time looking at the issues like us, and only remember the latest MSM sound bite, our desire to see the former is less and less likely
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Steyn on Palin
« Reply #13 on: October 06, 2008, 08:22:31 AM »
I would prefer that at least half of the voters just stayed home because many are just too stupid or lazy to have a vote.

Considering that most years we get a voter turnout of less than 45%, I'd say you got your wish.
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Steyn on Palin
« Reply #14 on: October 06, 2008, 09:48:51 AM »
It is pretty clear that there will be a greater than 45% turnout this year.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."