DebateGate
General Category => 3DHS => Topic started by: Christians4LessGvt on November 27, 2012, 04:49:26 PM
-
"Some Democrats are calling Republicans "racist" and "sexist" if they oppose the nomination of Susan Rice to Secretary of State. Just like when President Bush nominated Condoleezza Rice."
-
Calling people racists is so yesterday.
-
So one Rice is good, another is not.
I am not an expert on what Susan Rice might know, but her appearance on Sunday Morning TV to deliver what intelligence she was given does not seem to make her incompetent to me.
Obama's foreign policy is far better than Juniorbush's, so if he nominates her, that is okay with me.
-
All this is sleight of hand to give the job to Kerry.
-
All this is sleight of hand to give the job to Kerry.
That is a chilling thought.
Why are you thinking it?
-
So one Rice is good, another is not.
I am not an expert on what Susan Rice might know, but her appearance on Sunday Morning TV to deliver what intelligence she was given does not seem to make her incompetent to me.
Obama's foreign policy is far better than Juniorbush's, so if he nominates her, that is okay with me.
When Susan Rice speaks , whose credibility is on the line?
-
All this is sleight of hand to give the job to Kerry.
That is a chilling thought.
Why are you thinking it?
His name has floated before. He is friends with McCain and Graham. He would face a PR fight if he were nominated for Defense.
-
When Susan Rice speaks , whose credibility is on the line?
===========================
Why does anyone's credibility have to be on the line?
She is not known for not being believable to anyone but people who have overdosed on Fox.
I have no problem with her credibility.
-
Yes I remember how you defended Bush from accusations of lieing also.