DebateGate
General Category => 3DHS => Topic started by: Christians4LessGvt on December 16, 2012, 12:04:09 PM
-
Congressmen Confront EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson
Over Use of Alias 'Richard Windsor'
Dec 15, 2012 - By DANIEL HALPER
Two members of Congress sent a letter to EPA administrator Lisa Jackson over her use of the alias "Richard Windsor." The congressmen, Fred Upton and Cliff Stearns, want Jackson to explain her actions.
(http://www.weeklystandard.com/sites/all/files/imagecache/teaser-large/images/teasers/lisa-jackson-headshot.jpg)
"In recent weeks, questions have been raised in Congress and among public interest groups about the use of one or more secondary email accounts and aliases by you and potentially other officials at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)," they wrote in a letter addressed to Jackson. "Given your reported use of at least one alias email account in your conduct of agency business, we write to ask that you describe fully the nature and extent of this practice."
The letter contains a detailed list of questions, including:
"According to press reports, you have a government issued email account under the alias 'Richard Windsor.' Is this accurate? Does this email account still exist, and do you use it?"
"According to press reports, on November 20, 2012, EPA issued a statement indicating that '[f]or more than a decade, EPA administrators have been assigned two official, government issued email accounts: a public account and an internal account.' How many email accounts have been assigned to you at the agency? What are the email addresses for these accounts?"
"To your knowledge, are there any other heads of Federal agencies that are assigned an 'internal' email address? If yes, which Federal agencies?"
As well as several other questions. (Read the letter here.)
Upton is the chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce; Stearns is the chairman of the subcommittee on oversight and investigation.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/congressmen-confront-epa-administrator-lisa-jackson-over-use-alias-richard-windsor_666623.html (http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/congressmen-confront-epa-administrator-lisa-jackson-over-use-alias-richard-windsor_666623.html)
-
The idea that this was to be the most transparent administration ever has been the sickest joke >:(
-
Who, pray tell, was MORE transparent?
The CIA and the Oligarchy actually run this country.
Apparently, the President thought he could change things.
But he couldn't.
I think JFK may have tried.
Look what that got him.
-
The CIA killed Kennedy?
-
The CIA had a hand in it.
They set up Oswald and then set up Ruby to shoot Oswald.
JFK was pissed at them for killing Diem without his knowledge, and Trujillo as well.
----------------------------
What administration has been MORE transparent?
Carter, perhaps. Reagan, Olebush and Juniorbush, no way.
-
The CIA had a hand in it.
They set up Oswald and then set up Ruby to shoot Oswald.
JFK was pissed at them for killing Diem without his knowledge, and Trujillo as well.
So your evidence that they "had a hand" in killing Kennedy, is.....what again? And don't even go "well, its obvious, isn't it", because, no, its not.
-
This guy is the link between the CIA and Oswald.
de Mohrenschildt worked for the CIA and was assigned to watch over Oswald. There is a lot ofinfo on his role that has been recently declassified.
-
Well, we'll sure look forward to you actually providing some links to some of this evidence being requested. Again, your say so, just isn't so
-
Google the name given if you want to be smarter about this.
I have given up on education for you. You are adamant in your ignorance and insane opinions.
The motto that applies here is, "Never try to teach a pig to sing: it wastes your time and annoys the pig."
-
Sorry, doesn't work that way. If you can't back it up, its just your 99% wrong say so, and that's just not going to cut it, I'm afraid
And by the way, you never started trying to "educate me", so you can dispense with the transparent deflection of "giving up"
-
Go fork yourself. You are incapable of setting rules for me or anyone.
Stay ignorant, I could care less.
-
And you can just.....stay wrong. Your choice
-
What government has been more transparent than this administration?
You did not answer that.
As for the JFK assassination, it happened over 50 years ago. Most of the people involved are dead. It is simply history, and mostly unknown history.
The CIA is an agent of the Oligarchy. It wants to get this country in long wars in which it can make huge and steady profits: Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, the "War on Drugs", the "War on Terrorism".
-
What government has been more transparent than this administration?
What "government" or what prior administration? You weren't very clear, nor did you ask me that question, any time earlier, si hard to "not answer that" when it was never clearly asked to begin with
-
What administration has been MORE transparent than the present one?
That is a simple question.
-
Simple question, yes. Would have been nice, if that simple question had been actually asked of me by you....at sometime....instead of implying that it was, and simply was never responded to
To answer the question....pretty much every adminstration previously, though some to lesser extents. Since there's no real "scale" to objectively rank administrations, the issue is the hypocrisy of claiming that this administration was going to be the most transparent, and turns around to act in the most non-transparent way
-
Because one person has two e-mail accounts, you are going ape.
Juniorbush was not transparent. We still do not know who was attending Cheney's Oil Summit.
You simply hate President Obama, that is all. Too bad your tycoon pal lost .
You are not to be taken seriously.
-
LOL.......oh the irony