Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Xavier_Onassis

Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35] 36
511
3DHS / The creation
« on: December 06, 2007, 02:30:32 PM »

512
3DHS / Sun Tzu's five essentials for victory
« on: November 28, 2007, 01:25:50 PM »
Thus we may know that there are five essentials
    for victory:
    (1) He will win who knows when to fight and when
        not to fight.
    (2) He will win who knows how to handle both superior
        and inferior forces.
    (3) He will win whose army is animated by the same
        spirit throughout all its ranks.
    (4) He will win who, prepared himself, waits to take
        the enemy unprepared.
    (5) He will win who has military capacity and is
        not interfered with by the sovereign.


Will the mighty surge of Petraeus be victorious?
Who will get the nominations?
Sun Tzu has laid down the essentials.
His entire book, The Art of War is online, by the way.



513
Culture Vultures / Beowulf
« on: November 23, 2007, 03:10:05 PM »
I saw this in the 3-D version ($9.50 for a Seniors ticket!) on Thanksgiving Day, and despite the high ticket price, it is awesome. The very best special effects combined with a movie I have ever seen (Disney had a Michael Jackson piece of fluff called 'Captain EO" long ago at Disney world that was perhaps more impressive for sheer special effects, but it had no plot).  The story was somewhat altered. In the original, Beowulf, leader of the Geats (from S. Sweden) sails to Denmark and destroys Grendal, a butt-ugly scabby giant with poor dentalwork, who has been a party pooper at the local King Hrothgar's Mead Hall. Grendal has the bad habit of killing and occasionally chowing down on Hrothgar's warriors. Beowulf defeats him while butt naked (it is interesting how there is always something obstructing the B-man's genitals), ripping his arm off. Grendal goes back to mommy and dies. Mommy is played by Angelina Jolie. She is striking, naked, yet nippleless, and unlike in the original epic, Beowulf does not kill her. Instead, he inseminates her (off camera, I am afraid) and leaves Hrothgar's prized gold drinking horn with her.

There is a final, even more epic, castle-trashing fight at the end, in which Beowulf rips the heart out of a dragon (his son, actually), and later dies and is burned in his Viking dragonship.

The action is far more important than the plot, which as I said, is somewhat rewritten and is more coherent than in the original. The set design and the special effects should get Oscars, and the soundtrack, casting, costuming and visuals are spectacular. It held my attention despite of my being filled with Thanksgiving dinner (a low triptophan Taiwanese dinner, to be correct), and I have dozed off during Harry Potter and Arnold Schwartzenegger films in the past. Anthony Perkins plays the stocky Hrothgar, Ray Winstone plays Beowulf (and the dragon and the golden man, according to imdb). The whole thing is set around 517 AD in Denmark, which is properly snowy and chilly-looking. Christianity is mentioned several times, but rejected as a proper religion for monster slaying and dragonbashing Vikings.

Grendal is about as wretched a character as I have ever seen: uglier than Smeagol/Gollum and seventeen times bigger, and with a mostly incomprehensible screechy
voice. As close to a human cockroach as you will ever see. He was hairy and shaggy in the epic poem I think, but he is scabby with only a smattering of hair in this version.

Its plot may not be entirely true to the original, but its essence is unchanged. The best film I have seen in 2007 for sure.


514
3DHS / Zombies on the move!
« on: November 13, 2007, 01:00:29 PM »

515
Culture Vultures / Already, the remake of "300"!
« on: November 06, 2007, 10:47:56 AM »
Oscar for the best actor played by a piece of fruit.

Nomination for the best supporting actor played by vanilla custard.




http://www.koreus.com/video/300-spartan-apples.html

517
3DHS / How to cope with death
« on: November 06, 2007, 10:17:31 AM »

518
3DHS / Giant pink rabbit found on Italian hillside!
« on: November 04, 2007, 07:33:26 AM »
http://www.show.me.uk/site/news/STO1166.html

The question is, of course, is, "Is it Art?"

It seems to have been Giuseppe, Girolamo, Rocco, Vito, Guido and Cousin Vinny from America, maybe, and many, many, molto, more

519
3DHS / Quotes from Ghandi
« on: October 30, 2007, 09:47:58 AM »
    *  "I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent."
    * "It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence."
    * "A man is but the product of his thoughts. What he thinks, he becomes."
    * "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win."
    * "Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever."
Quotes about Christianity:

    *  "The Bible tells us to love our neighbors, and also to love our enemies; probably because they are generally the same people."
    * "Alexander, Caesar, Charlemagne, and myself founded empires; but what foundation did we rest the creations of our genius? Upon force. Jesus Christ founded an empire upon love; and at this hour millions of men would die for Him."
    * "I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen, not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else."
    * "I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ."
    * "The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and left untried."



521
3DHS / The Golddigger and the Trader
« on: October 14, 2007, 04:40:39 AM »
A couple made for each other... sort of:

THIS APPEARED ON CRAIG'S LIST NY
What am I doing wrong?

Okay, I'm tired of beating around the bush. I'm a beautiful
(spectacularly beautiful) 25 year old girl. I'm articulate and classy.
I'm not from New York . I'm looking to get married to a guy who makes at
least half a million a year. I know how that sounds, but keep in mind
that a million a year is middle class in New York City , so I don't think
I'm overreaching at all.

Are there any guys who make 500K or more on this board? Any wives? Could
you send me some tips? I dated a business man who makes average around
200 - 250. But that's where I seem to hit a roadblock. 250,000 won't get
me to central park west. I know a woman in my yoga class who was married
to an investment banker and lives in Tribeca, and she's not as pretty as
I am, nor is she a great genius. So what is she doing right? How do I
get to her level?

Here are my questions specifically:

- Where do you single rich men hang out? Give me specifics- bars,
restaurants, gyms

-What are you looking for in a mate? Be honest guys, you won't hurt my
feelings

-Is there an age range I should be targeting (I'm 25)?

- Why are some of the women living lavish lifestyles on the upper east
side so plain? I've seen really 'plain jane' boring types who have
nothing to offer married to incredibly wealthy guys. I've seen drop dead
gorgeous girls in singles bars in the east village. What's the story
there?

- Jobs I should look out for? Everyone knows - lawyer, investment
banker, doctor. How much do those guys really make? And where do they
hang out? Where do the hedge fund guys hang out?

- How you decide marriage vs. just a girlfriend? I am looking for
MARRIAGE ONLY

Please hold your insults - I'm putting myself out there in an honest
way. Most beautiful women are superficial; at least I'm being up front
about it. I wouldn't be searching for these kind of guys if I wasn't
able to match them - in looks, culture, sophistication, and keeping a
nice home and hearth.

* it's NOT ok to contact this poster with
services or
other commercial interests

PostingID: 432279810
THE ANSWER
Dear Pers-431649184:
I read your posting with great interest and have thought meaningfully
about your dilemma. I offer the following analysis of your predicament.
Firstly, I'm not wasting your time, I qualify as a guy who fits your
bill; that is I make more than $500K per year. That said here's how I
see it.

Your offer, from the prospective of a guy like me, is plain and simple a
cr@ppy business deal. Here's why. Cutting through all the B.S., what you
suggest is a simple trade: you bring your looks to the party and I bring
my money. Fine, simple. But here's the rub, your looks will fade and my
money will likely continue into perpetuity...in fact, it is very likely
that my income increases but it is an absolute certainty that you won't
be getting any more beautiful!

So, in economic terms you are a depreciating asset and I am an earning
asset. Not only are you a depreciating asset, your depreciation
accelerates! Let me explain, you're 25 now and will likely stay pretty
hot for the next 5 years, but less so each year. Then the fade begins in
earnest. By 35 stick a fork in you!

So in Wall Street terms, we would call you a trading position, not a buy
and hold...hence the rub...marriage. It doesn't make good business sense
to "buy you" (which is what you're asking) so I'd rather lease. In case
you think I'm being cruel, I would say the following. If my money were
to go away, so would you, so when your beauty fades I need an out. It's
as simple as that. So a deal that makes sense is dating, not marriage.

Separately, I was taught early in my career about efficient markets. So,
I wonder why a girl as "articulate, classy and spectacularly beautiful"
as you has been unable to find your sugar daddy. I find it hard to
believe that if you are as gorgeous as you say you are that the $500K
hasn't found you, if not only for a tryout.

By the way, you could always find a way to make your own money and then
we wouldn't need to have this difficult conversation.

With all that said, I must say you're going about it the right way.
Classic "pump and dump."
I hope this is helpful, and if you want to enter into some sort of
lease, let me know.


Brian Wilhite
Nollenberger Capital Partners
Corporate EVP/Director of Capital Markets
101 California St. #3100
SF, CA 94111
Direct- 415.402.6010
Mobile- 415.717.0424
Aim IM: Bwilhite NCP
AKMustard is offline      Reply With Quote
AKMustard
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by AKMustard

522
3DHS / What's the difference between Iraq and Vietnam?
« on: September 29, 2007, 08:38:50 PM »
Juniorbush & Cheney had a plan to get out of Vietnam. :P ;D :D

523
3DHS / Another General Criticizes Iraq War
« on: June 30, 2007, 07:23:43 PM »
Retired Gen. George Washington Criticizes Bush's Handling Of Iraq War



WASHINGTON, DC?Breaking a 211-year media silence, retired Army Gen. George Washington appeared on NBC's Meet the Press Sunday to speak out against many aspects of the way the Iraq war has been waged.
Enlarge Image Gen. George Washington

Washington likens Vice President Cheney to controversial British Chancellor of the Exchequer and Stamp Act architect George Greenville.

Washington, whose appearance marked the first time the military leader and statesman had spoken publicly since his 1796 farewell address in Philadelphia, is the latest in a string of retired generals stepping forward to criticize the Iraq war.

"This entire military venture has been foolhardy and of ill design," said Washington, dressed in his customary breeches and frilly cravat. "The manifold mistakes committed by this president in Iraq carry grave consequences, and he who holds the position of commander in chief has the responsibility to right those wrongs."

Washington noted that while Saddam Hussein was an indefensible tyrant, that alone did not justify a "conflict that seems without design or end."

"The Iraqi people did suffer greatly under unjust rule," Washington said. "But in truth, it is the duty of any people that wishes to be free to fight for its own independence. Had France meddled in our revolution beyond the guidance and material assistance they provided, I should think similar unrest would have darkened our nation's earliest hours."
Enlarge Image CNN Retired Gen. Speaks Out

Washington made the cable news rounds, telling Wolf Blitzer that the war was a "tragic mistake for our nation."

The Virginia-born Revolutionary War veteran and national-capital namesake also expressed his worry over the state of the American militia, the unchecked powers of the executive branch, and the lack of a congressional declaration of war.

"The very genius of the American presidency is that it is an office held by an elected representative of the people, not by a monarch who can rule by fiat and enact policy at will," Washington said.

The retired general asserted that many of the current problems in Iraq could easily have been predicted by wiser civilian leadership.

"I can say from personal experience that even a malnourished force with feet clad in rags should not be underestimated, even by a far superior power," added Washington, who has disavowed further comparison between the Iraqi insurgency and the American colonists. "There is nothing a committed fighting force cannot accomplish if bolstered by the strength of its convictions."

Washington's critical comments echo those of other retired generals, including Maj. Gen. John Batiste and former NATO Supreme Allied Commander Wesley Clark, who attacked Bush's Iraq policy in a series of television ads run by political action committee VoteVets.org during the 2006 midterm elections.

"We're very happy that someone of General Washington's stature is speaking out," said Jon Soltz, cofounder and chairman of VoteVets.org. "He has impeccable conservative credentials, extensive foreign policy experience, is a true citizen-soldier with a proven commitment to his country, and, if that's not enough to get Bush to listen, he's the face on the dollar bill."

However, White House response to the former general's criticism was swift and sharp. Spokesman Tony Fratto dismissed Washington as "increasingly irrelevant" and "a relic" who "made some embarrassing gaffes" during his own military career, such as the Continental Army's near destruction in the Battle of Long Island in 1776.

"The general's reckless and irresponsible comments show that he clearly does not understand the realities of 21st-century warfare," Fratto said.

Conservative pundits moved quickly to discredit the decorated general.

"I don't care who you are?or if you cannot tell a lie?it's un-American to question the president in a time of war," Sean Hannity said on his radio program Monday. "Plus, I find it very interesting that a man who owned slaves and sold hemp thinks he's entitled to give our Commander in Chief lessons on how to run a war."

Toward the end of his Meet the Press interview, Washington expressed fears for the future of Iraq, Middle East policy, and America itself.

"These convoluted foreign adventures were not what I envisaged for my young nation," Washington said. "Certainly the citizens of the republic deserve better than this. Had I but known this was the fated course of my country, I might not have found the strength to liberate Her from the mantle of King George."

524
3DHS / Israel: new industry; Palestinians: guinea pigs
« on: June 18, 2007, 09:05:09 PM »

                  

   

Naomi Klein
Editor's Note: This article has been updated with additional detail on recent developments in Gaza.

   
   
Gaza in the hands of Hamas, with masked militants sitting in the president's chair; the West Bank on the edge; Israeli army camps hastily assembled in the Golan Heights; a spy satellite over Iran and Syria; war with Hezbollah a hair trigger away; a scandal-plagued political class facing a total loss of public faith.

At a glance, things aren't going well for Israel. But here's a puzzle: Why, in the midst of such chaos and carnage, is the Israeli economy booming like it's 1999, with a roaring stock market and growth rates nearing China's?

Thomas Friedman recently offered his theory in the New York Times. Israel "nurtures and rewards individual imagination," and so its people are constantly spawning ingenious high-tech start-ups--no matter what messes their politicians are making. After perusing class projects by students in engineering and computer science at Ben Gurion University, Friedman made one of his famous fake-sense pronouncements: Israel "had discovered oil." This oil, apparently, is located in the minds of Israel's "young innovators and venture capitalists," who are too busy making megadeals with Google to be held back by politics.

CONTINUED BELOW
Here's another theory: Israel's economy isn't booming despite the political chaos that devours the headlines but because of it. This phase of development dates back to the mid-'90s, when Israel was in the vanguard of the information revolution--the most tech-dependent economy in the world. After the dot-com bubble burst in 2000, Israel's economy was devastated, facing its worst year since 1953. Then came 9/11, and suddenly new profit vistas opened up for any company that claimed it could spot terrorists in crowds, seal borders from attack and extract confessions from closed-mouthed prisoners.

Within three years, large parts of Israel's tech economy had been radically repurposed. Put in Friedmanesque terms: Israel went from inventing the networking tools of the "flat world" to selling fences to an apartheid planet. Many of the country's most successful entrepreneurs are using Israel's status as a fortressed state, surrounded by furious enemies, as a kind of twenty-four-hour-a-day showroom--a living example of how to enjoy relative safety amid constant war. And the reason Israel is now enjoying supergrowth is that those companies are busily exporting that model to the world.

Discussions of Israel's military trade usually focus on the flow of weapons into the country--US-made Caterpillar bulldozers used to destroy homes in the West Bank and British companies supplying parts for F-16s. Overlooked is Israel's huge and expanding export business. Israel now sends $1.2 billion in "defense" products to the United States--up dramatically from $270 million in 1999. In 2006 Israel exported $3.4 billion in defense products--well over a billion more than it received in US military aid. That makes Israel the fourth-largest arms dealer in the world, overtaking Britain.

Much of this growth has been in the so-called "homeland security" sector. Before 9/11 homeland security barely existed as an industry. By the end of this year, Israeli exports in the sector will reach $1.2 billion--an increase of 20 percent. The key products and services are high-tech fences, unmanned drones, biometric IDs, video and audio surveillance gear, air passenger profiling and prisoner interrogation systems--precisely the tools and technologies Israel has used to lock in the occupied territories.

And that is why the chaos in Gaza and the rest of the region doesn't threaten the bottom line in Tel Aviv, and may actually boost it. Israel has learned to turn endless war into a brand asset, pitching its uprooting, occupation and containment of the Palestinian people as a half-century head start in the "global war on terror."

It's no coincidence that the class projects at Ben Gurion that so impressed Friedman have names like "Innovative Covariance Matrix for Point Target Detection in Hyperspectral Images" and "Algorithms for Obstacle Detection and Avoidance." Thirty homeland security companies were launched in Israel in the past six months alone, thanks in large part to lavish government subsidies that have transformed the Israeli army and the country's universities into incubators for security and weapons start-ups (something to keep in mind in the debates about the academic boycott).

Next week, the most established of these companies will travel to Europe for the Paris Air Show, the arms industry's equivalent of Fashion Week. One of the Israeli companies exhibiting is Suspect Detection Systems (SDS), which will be showcasing its Cogito1002, a white, sci-fi-looking security kiosk that asks air travelers to answer a series of computer-generated questions, tailored to their country of origin, while they hold their hand on a "biofeedback" sensor. The device reads the body's reactions to the questions, and certain responses flag the passenger as "suspect."

Like hundreds of other Israeli security start-ups, SDS boasts that it was founded by veterans of Israel's secret police and that its products were road-tested on Palestinians. Not only has the company tried out the biofeedback terminals at a West Bank checkpoint; it claims the "concept is supported and enhanced by knowledge acquired and assimilated from the analysis of thousands of case studies related to suicide bombers in Israel."

Another star of the Paris Air Show will be Israeli defense giant Elbit, which plans to showcase its Hermes 450 and 900 unmanned air vehicles. As recently as May, according to press reports, Israel used the drones on bombing missions in Gaza. Once tested in the territories, they are exported abroad: The Hermes has already been used at the Arizona-Mexico border; Cogito1002 terminals are being auditioned at an unnamed US airport; and Elbit, one of the companies behind Israel's "security barrier," has partnered with Boeing to construct the Department of Homeland Security's $2.5 billion "virtual" border fence around the United States.

Since Israel began its policy of sealing off the occupied territories with checkpoints and walls, human rights activists have often compared Gaza and the West Bank to open-air prisons. But in researching the explosion of Israel's homeland security sector, a topic I explore in greater detail in a forthcoming book (The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism), it strikes me that they are something else too: laboratories where the terrifying tools of our security states are being field-tested. Palestinians--whether living in the West Bank or what the Israeli politicians are already calling "Hamasistan"--are no longer just targets. They are guinea pigs.

So in a way Friedman is right: Israel has struck oil. But the oil isn't the imagination of its techie entrepreneurs. The oil is the war on terror, the state of constant fear that creates a bottomless global demand for devices that watch, listen, contain and target "suspects." And fear, it turns out, is the ultimate renewable resource.


525
3DHS / Independence in Kosovo and Taiwan
« on: June 13, 2007, 11:31:29 AM »
Taiwan has rarely been an integral part of China. In 1895, the Japanese took over Taiwan and ruled it until the end of WWII with Japan. Japan was forced to leave Taiwan. The Republic of China was engaged in a Civil War with various warlords from 1911 through 1936, when it was invaded by Japan. After the Japanese were forced out, the Civil War, now mostly between the Kuomintang of Chiang Kai Shek and the Red Army led by Mao and Chao Enlai lasted until 1950 or so, when the last of the Kuomantang took refuge in Taiwan with the protection of the US Navy. Had they been truly clever, they would have taken over Hainan Island as well, but they didn't, so that point is moot.

Eventually, Taiwan became democratic. The bogus "delegates" in the ROC legislature from provinces that the ROC had not controlled since 1950 died off, as did Chaing and Chaing, Jr. and eventually rule of Taiwan by the Taiwanese majority in the Green Party and its allies  came to pass. Taiwan has a population of 22 million and one of the highest standards of living in Asia. Most of the People's Republic is Third World economically, poor and far less well educated.


In 1917, Albania became independent, with its own king. The Slovenians, Serbs, Montenegrans, Macedonians, Bosnians & Herzegovinians and Croats were all federated into Yugoslavia. The Albanian and Hungarian speaking people were not given their own republics within the federation, supposedly because there was already  and independent Hungary and an independent Albania.

Yugoslavia was largely the product of Wilson's insistence that each nationality should have its own country. No one important actually gave a crap about  Yugoslavia, as they did about Alsace-Lorraine or the Saar or even Poland, so lumping eight nationalities into a federation of six republics under a king did not seem to be a bad idea.

After WWII, which made Albania a colony of Italy for several years and deeply divided the Croats (mostly pro German) and the Serbs (mostly pro-Russian) into two bunches, somehos the country was held together, largely by force rather than agreement under Marshal Tito.  When Tito died, Yugoslavia became six nations.

During the period 1940-1990 or so, thousands of Albanians fled Albania, which was by far the most oppressive and poorest country in Europe. Most of them ended up in Kosovo, which was at one time the seat of Christian Serb resistance to Ottoman rule.

Here is the problem: the US has decided that Kosovo must be independent (and, curiously, not a part of Greater Albania), because that is what the Kosovars want. Taiwanese do not have the right to decide that they don't want to be part of the People's Republic.

Serbia is somewhat poor, less so than Kosovo, but is now democratic. Somehow the state department has decided that Kosovo must be independent from Serbia, but Taiwan must, no matter what the people of Taiwan want, must be part of the oppressive PRC.

I suggest that this sucks in a rather bigtime fashion. I suggest that the US' stance on this is rather pusilanimous, perhaps even racist: white Kosovars have a right to self-determination, but yellow Taiwanese, despite their far higher level of education and competence at pretty much everything, when compared with the Kosovars, do not.
 

Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35] 36