Author Topic: Cheerleader who wouldn't  (Read 703 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Cheerleader who wouldn't
« on: June 19, 2011, 12:29:56 PM »
The Supreme Court refused to review the case of a high school cheerleader who was kicked off the squad for refusing to cheer for the basketball player she said had raped her. And as a lovely parting gift, the girl’s family must now repay the school $45,000 in legal fees for what a lower court termed as a frivolous lawsuit. Way to harsh our Bin Laden buzz, America.

You probably remember the Silsbee High School (Texas) cheerleading case. A then-cheerleader for the school was dismissed from the squad for refusing to cheer for the basketball player she said had raped her. H.S., as she is identified, is now in college, but she appealed the school’s ruling all the way to the Supreme Court. And on Monday the Court declined to review her appeal, nearly two years after the original incident.

Rakheem Bolton was accused of sexually assaulting the 16-year-old at a party. He was eventually convicted of misdemeanor assault, and got probation, a fine, and had to attend anger management classes.

H.S. said that the school at first told her to avoid Bolton and to refrain from attending homecoming activities, which she refused to do. She had been booted off the cheerleading squad for refusing to cheer for Bolton by name during a basketball game. The specific cheer was: “Two, four, six, eight, ten, come on, Rakheem, put it in.” No, I’m not making that up.

She was dismissed from the team for her actions. “As a team, I cheered for them as a whole. When he stepped up to the free-throw line, it didn’t feel right for me to have to cheer for him after what he did to me,” she said.

A federal appeals court ruled in September that the cheerleader was speaking for the school, not herself, and had no right to remain silent when called on to cheer the athlete by name.

The Supreme Court denied review of the case Monday without comment.

The family’s lawyer, Laurence Watts, said the ruling means students who try to exercise their right of free speech can be punished for refusing to follow “insensitive and unreasonable directions.”
And as a reward for trying to stick up for herself and not buckle to the pressures of authority, bureaucracy and male chauvinism, the girl’s parents receive a $45,000 bill for legal expenses. It’s a terrific byproduct of our legal system, wherein victims are cowered into keeping quiet by the prospect of negative publicity and extreme financial hardship. I guess that’s what it means when people say our freedom isn’t free.

***

http://www.helpthecheerleader.com/about-this-case/

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Cheerleader who wouldn't
« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2011, 01:48:01 PM »
I agree that this seems like a valid case of denial of rights.

I suppose that the Supremes decided to refuse to deal with the case because cheerleading is not a major free speech issue.

One could also state that playing basketball is also not a guaranteed right of all students. Raping cheerleaders, even at festive, off campus activities, is not indicative of proper team spirit.

It seems to me that the basketball player should have been thrown off the team as a part of his penalty for assault, and then this would never have been an issue.

The cheer she was expected to recite seems to be decidedly inappropriate.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Cheerleader who wouldn't
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2011, 02:42:28 PM »
They can't assume an accusation is true.
A member of the Surpreme Court himself has been falsely accused.

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Cheerleader who wouldn't
« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2011, 03:52:24 PM »
In this case, the dog in question was convicted and fined.

As for Clarence Thomas being accused, he was NOT accused in a court of law of a crime, and that explains why his legal guilt is still in question. It is pretty clear that his wife is a lobbyist and that he did not declare this as required, though.

Thomas being accused of being a horn dawg in his hearing long ago is totally unrelated in every way to this case.

In this case, the rapist was found guilty of rape and was penalized. As I said, his sorry ass should have been thrown off the team as a part of his penalty. The cheerleader was clearly justified in not publicly cheering for him to "put it in".

I am pretty sure that no one would order the school to fork over $45,000 for an unproven accusation.

"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Kramer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5762
  • Repeal ObamaCare
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Cheerleader who wouldn't
« Reply #4 on: June 19, 2011, 04:16:36 PM »
A good lesson to learn: Life isn't always fair. But justice will be done at some point, might not be soon enough for some.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Cheerleader who wouldn't
« Reply #5 on: June 22, 2011, 02:37:36 AM »
..............In this case, the rapist was found guilty of rape and was penalized. As I said, his sorry ass should have been thrown off the team as a part of his penalty. The cheerleader was clearly justified in not publicly cheering for him to "put it in".

I am pretty sure that no one would order the school to fork over $45,000 for an unproven accusation.


I didn't understand this the same way.


Did the Basketball player get convicted of rape? Did he plea bargan to a lesser charge? or was the evidence too weak to convict on the more serious charge?

Was the school or the girls family forfiet the $45K ?

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Cheerleader who wouldn't
« Reply #6 on: June 22, 2011, 12:23:40 PM »
It seems to me that there was an official recognition of the fact that the basketball player was at fault, or the school district would not have awarded her $45,000.

I do not blame her for refusing to do the cheer.

"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Cheerleader who wouldn't
« Reply #7 on: June 22, 2011, 10:48:29 PM »
  Skim it over again, the girls family owes that money to t he school.

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Cheerleader who wouldn't
« Reply #8 on: June 23, 2011, 11:53:14 AM »
I bet they never see any of it.

Sorry, but I would say that the cheerleader was on the right side here.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Cheerleader who wouldn't
« Reply #9 on: June 24, 2011, 01:31:57 AM »
I bet they never see any of it.

Sorry, but I would say that the cheerleader was on the right side here.

I agree with you , not the court.