And no argument, no matter how logical or factual it is, would evoke more than yet another incredible snide remark from sirs, who is incapable of rational thought and even original rhetoric.
When are you going to grasp that nothing said here, has anything to do with me. Your comments and opinions have squat to do with any expectation of changing my POV, so why lay claim to using that as an excuse for failing to support your POV?? I see that your projection is thick with the notion of snide remarks & incapable of rational thought. Couldn't have described the vast majority of what you post, any better. The point is, its transparent in your lack of ability to support claims your making or refuting points someone else is making, by claiming how it makes no difference if you were to try.
By NOT trying, you reinforce everything everyone else IS saying.
It's not about me, or my grasp of logic or debate. It's all about what YOU, a supposed learner-ed Professor, can demonstrate, as it relates to logic and debate. So far, it's still severely wanting.
The good news is, that isn't set in stone. YOU, can make the effort to better demonstrate & highlight your POV. YOU, can better demonstrate an ability to refute concepts O'Reilly is making. And no manner of what I don't agree with can change that, since its not and never has been about me. It's all about what YOU can deliver. Civil substantive debate? Or more standard derogatory insults & excuses as to why you can't be bothered to try.
Again, it's not about me, (or Plane, of Cu4, or anyone one else for that matter), and why we might not agree with what you claim. This is all you, and how you can demonstrate HOW, you are right in your claims, beyond just your say so