Marriage - latest addition to hate speech list?

[sirs]

<<Ahhh, good to see Tee's refining his abhorrent misrepresentation techniques.  Good job, Tee>>

Abhorrent?  moi?  What did I "misrepresent" this time?

The ususal...applying words and sentiment to someone's post that were no where to be found.  In this case the implying only you, and you alone have come to the realization of the bias in media, and broke the news for all the rest of us to see.  Even with the sarcasm applied, it missed the mark completely

[Michael Tee]

But you claimed I "validated the template" of which papers were RW or LW, i.e. until I came along, nobody knew for sure which was which.  I didn't validate anything.  The Washington Times is a RW rag and everyone knows it.

[sirs]

But you claimed I "validated the template" of which papers were RW or LW, i.e. until I came along, nobody knew for sure which was which.  I didn't validate anything. 

No, it simply was in reference to reinforcing the current template everyone does know about, but so often from the left attemps to deny it, minimize it, then lastly ridicule it.  See?, wrong again