Author Topic: The Dazzling Mysterious Gatsby  (Read 883 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
The Dazzling Mysterious Gatsby
« on: September 02, 2008, 11:40:44 AM »
The Perfect Stranger
By Charles Krauthammer

WASHINGTON -- Barack Obama is an immensely talented man whose talents have been largely devoted to crafting, and chronicling, his own life. Not things. Not ideas. Not institutions. But himself.

Nothing wrong or even terribly odd about that, except that he is laying claim to the job of crafting the coming history of the United States. A leap of such audacity is odd. The air of unease at the Democratic convention this week was not just a result of the Clinton psychodrama. The deeper anxiety was that the party was nominating a man of many gifts but precious few accomplishments -- bearing even fewer witnesses.

When John Kerry was introduced at his convention four years ago, an honor guard of a dozen mates from his Vietnam days surrounded him on the podium attesting to his character and readiness to lead. Such personal testimonials are the norm. The roster of fellow soldiers or fellow senators who could from personal experience vouch for John McCain is rather long. At a less partisan date in the calendar, that roster might even include Democrats Russ Feingold and Edward Kennedy, with whom John McCain has worked to fashion important legislation.

Eerily missing at the Democratic convention this year were people of stature who were seriously involved at some point in Obama's life standing up to say: I know Barack Obama. I've been with Barack Obama. We've toiled/endured together. You can trust him. I do.

Hillary Clinton could have said something like that. She and Obama had, after all, engaged in a historic, utterly compelling contest for the nomination. During her convention speech, you kept waiting for her to offer just one line of testimony: I have come to know this man, to admire this man, to see his character, his courage, his wisdom, his judgment. Whatever. Anything.

Instead, nothing. She of course endorsed him. But the endorsement was entirely programmatic: We're all Democrats. He's a Democrat. He believes what you believe. So we must elect him -- I am currently unavailable -- to get Democratic things done. God bless America.

Clinton's withholding the "I've come to know this man" was vindictive and supremely self-serving -- but jarring, too, because you realize that if she didn't do it, no one else would. Not because of any inherent deficiency in Obama's character. But simply as a reflection of a young life with a biography remarkably thin by the standard of presidential candidates.

Who was there to speak about the real Barack Obama? His wife. She could tell you about Barack the father, the husband, the family man in a winning and perfectly sincere way. But that only takes you so far. It doesn't take you to the public man, the national leader.

Who is to testify to that? Hillary's husband on night three did aver that Obama is "ready to lead." However, he offered not a shred of evidence, let alone personal experience with Obama. And although he pulled it off charmingly, everyone knew that, having been suggesting precisely the opposite for months, he meant not a word of it.

Obama's vice presidential selection, Joe Biden, naturally advertised his patron's virtues, such as the fact that he had "reached across party lines to ... keep nuclear weapons out of the hands of terrorists." But securing loose nukes is as bipartisan as motherhood and as uncontroversial as apple pie. The measure was so minimal that it passed by voice vote and received near zero media coverage.

Thought experiment. Assume John McCain had retired from politics. Would he have testified to Obama's political courage in reaching across the aisle to work with him on ethics reform, a collaboration Obama boasted about in the Saddleback debate? "In fact," reports the Annenberg Political Fact Check, "the two worked together for barely a week, after which McCain accused Obama of 'partisan posturing'" -- and launched a volcanic missive charging him with double cross.

So where are the colleagues? The buddies? The political or spiritual soul mates? His most important spiritual adviser and mentor was Jeremiah Wright. But he's out. Then there's William Ayers, with whom he served on a board. He's out. Where are the others?

The oddity of this convention is that its central figure is the ultimate self-made man, a dazzling mysterious Gatsby. The palpable apprehension is that the anointed is a stranger -- a deeply engaging, elegant, brilliant stranger with whom the Democrats had a torrid affair. Having slowly woken up, they see the ring and wonder who exactly they married last night.


Post Dem Convention Analysis
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Dazzling Mysterious Gatsby
« Reply #1 on: September 02, 2008, 10:30:56 PM »
<<Eerily missing at the Democratic convention this year were people of stature who were seriously involved at some point in Obama's life standing up to say: I know Barack Obama. I've been with Barack Obama. We've toiled/endured together. You can trust him. I do. >>

Yeah.  I guess Krauthammer missed the part where millions of new voters came into the Democratic Party because Obama WASN'T from the same old tired clique of jabbering do-nothing politicians.  Where Obama's appeal was to new voters who wanted something new and old voters who were tired of everything old.

<<So where are the colleagues? The buddies? The political or spiritual soul mates? His most important spiritual adviser and mentor was Jeremiah Wright. But he's out. Then there's William Ayers, with whom he served on a board. He's out. Where are the others?>>

I guess Krauthammer sort of answered his own question, didn't he?  The politics of character assassination have already taken out two of Obama's old allies.  But actually, I have seen on various talk shows some of Obama's friends, a law school classmate, an older woman who gave him the community organizer job, but they were blacks and they led pretty unremarkable lives, they were not the "people of stature" that Krauthammer is looking to to validate Obama the man.  His wife tried to validate Obama, but as Krauthammer says,

<<She could tell you about Barack the father, the husband, the family man in a winning and perfectly sincere way. >>

But of course, none of that is really important.  What kind of father or husband he is doesn't really tell you his character.  (Boy, John Insane better hope with all his weaselly little heart that that is true!!)   Who really cares if the guy is a rotten husband or a lousy father?  McCain figures that's one of the job requirements!!

<<But that only takes you so far. It doesn't take you to the public man, the national leader.>>

I get it.  Krauthammer believes that integrity, caring, responsibility, judgment - - these are qualities that can be pulled on like a cloak, once a man assumes public office.  McCain of course is a supremely dishonourable, treacherous, untrustworthy little liar in his personal life, but - - as Krauthammer apparently believes, once he enters the Oval Office as President, all these virtues will magically attach themselves to him.  OTOH, Barak Obama, apparently loyal, wise, caring and honest as a husband and father is an unknown quantity as President - - Krauthammer appears to believe all these virtues could desert the man as soon as he takes the oath of office.

Well, to tell the truth, Krauthammer, a dyed-in-the-wool Zionist hack if there ever was one, has become crazier and crazier in the last three or four years, to the point where it's just pointless to struggle through his pretentious crap to the end, usually he builds an entire column on one simple idea ("Obama has no old cronies," for example) and not only are all the elaborations poorly constructed flights of fantasy, but the central premise as well is either completely meaningless in context or simply not true.


sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Dazzling Mysterious Gatsby
« Reply #2 on: September 02, 2008, 10:43:46 PM »
I guess Tee missed the part where Krauthammer was specifically talking about the Convention, and the speakers involved vs not.  An intergral ommision when one's effort is to deflect and misrepresent the point being made.  SOP, I guess
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Dazzling Mysterious Gatsby
« Reply #3 on: September 02, 2008, 11:58:52 PM »
I guess Krauthammer sort of answered his own question, didn't he?  The politics of character assassination have already taken out two of Obama's old allies.  But actually, I have seen on various talk shows some of Obama's friends, a law school classmate, an older woman who gave him the community organizer job, but they were blacks and they led pretty unremarkable lives, they were not the "people of stature" that Krauthammer is looking to to validate Obama the man.  His wife tried to validate Obama, but as Krauthammer says,




If Wright and Ayers would like to tour on the Obama bus I don't see how I would object.

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Dazzling Mysterious Gatsby
« Reply #4 on: September 03, 2008, 12:40:45 AM »
<<I guess Tee missed the part where Krauthammer was specifically talking about the Convention, and the speakers involved vs not.  An intergral ommision when one's effort is to deflect and misrepresent the point being made.  SOP, I guess>>

What's the difference?  A new face won't have old Washington cronies.  Not at the primaries, not at the convention.  He's new.  No old cronies.  Get it?

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Dazzling Mysterious Gatsby
« Reply #5 on: September 03, 2008, 12:57:31 AM »
<<I guess Tee missed the part where Krauthammer was specifically talking about the Convention, and the speakers involved vs not.  An intergral ommision when one's effort is to deflect and misrepresent the point being made.  SOP, I guess>>

What's the difference?  A new face won't have old Washington cronies.  Not at the primaries, not at the convention.  He's new.  No old cronies.  Get it?

Did he have any influence on who was chosen to speak?

Both Clintons , but no one who knew him ten years ago except his wife?

Are all of the Polls of Chicago unavailible?

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Dazzling Mysterious Gatsby
« Reply #6 on: September 03, 2008, 03:16:07 AM »
Precisely Plane.  Though I doubt Tee will ever "get it".  I wonder who failed at telling Obama's pick for VP is the epitome and personification of an "old Washington Cronie"
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Dazzling Mysterious Gatsby
« Reply #7 on: September 03, 2008, 10:27:16 AM »
<<Precisely Plane.  Though I doubt Tee will ever "get it".  I wonder who failed at telling Obama's pick for VP is the epitome and personification of an "old Washington Cronie"..

I don't approve of Biden except that I think he'll make an excellent attack dog and lends (as a competent and savvy adviser) some additional cred (un-needed IMHO) to Obama on foreign policy and military matters.


sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Dazzling Mysterious Gatsby
« Reply #8 on: September 03, 2008, 11:02:09 AM »
In other words, an old Washington Cronie as his advisor, who's the polar opposite to Obama's "message", of hope & change.  Yea, we got it
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle