Author Topic: Deconstructing "Comprehensive Immigration Reform"  (Read 436 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Deconstructing "Comprehensive Immigration Reform"
« on: June 02, 2010, 09:21:43 PM »
In the wake of Arizona?s new laws, the illegal alien special interests are working overtime making their last ditch pitch for amnesty before mid-terms elections, robotically reciting how they want to ?fix? our immigration problems:

"We need to fix our broken immigration system. We need a path to citizenship for undocumented workers so they can go to the back of the line, get right with the law, and implement an orderly flow of needed workers, and a policy which secures the borders."  

For those in the know, of course, it's all nonsense - word play and empty promises:

Fix A Broken System: When they say the system is broken they actually mean illegal aliens face deportation, and that America is not admitting enough legal immigrants fast enough. The fact is illegal aliens aren?t supposed to be in the United States - by definition they do not have legal status. As regards our level of legal immigration, America currently allows in more than one million people a year, more than any other industrialized country on the planet.

The bottom line is that the only thing broken about our immigration system is an unwillingness to impose sensible limitations and enforce the laws.  Truth in labeling might suggest that their version of "fixing a broken system? should be read as ?making a broken system worse."

Path to Citizenship: Euphemisms for amnesty wear thin quickly so the new phrase "path to citizenship" has entered the lexicon. We already have a "path to citizenship" and it starts with applying for a green card and getting in line.  

Go to the Back of the Line:  To most people, going to the back of the line would mean returning home, filling out the necessary forms, and then waiting for a reply.  What amnesty advocates mean by going to the back of the line is that we create a brand new line for those who have broken the law right here in this country.  

Get Right with the Law:  This phrase suggests that administratively converting 13 million people from illegal status to legal status "gets them right with the law." Accommodating law-breaking by simply rewriting the rules to fit the circumstances is one of the most insidious aspects of amnesty.

Undocumented Workers: Given the huge sums of money the special interests have, one would assume their high-paid consultants would have told them that this euphemism expired years ago.  We all know it means illegal aliens, but amnesty advocates believe that using the adjective ?undocumented? magically erases the illegality, while claiming they are "workers" suggests all are gainfully employed, which they're often not.  The proper reference is "illegal aliens."  "Illegal" means prohibited by law.  Yes, entry without inspection into the U.S is prohibited.  And "alien" is a term defined in 8 U.S.C. Section 1101 and used by legal professionals across the board including the United States Supreme Court.  It's ok to say illegal aliens. You'll be in good company.

Orderly Flow of Workers: This is a phrase that by its own definition assumes we actually need more workers. It refers to our foreign guest worker program.  In addition to the 1.2 million legal immigrants the U.S. admits each year, and the 13 million illegal aliens currently living here, the U.S. also brings in another one million foreign nationals through work visas year after year. With a national unemployment rate of 9.9 percent, any endorsement of our massive foreign guest worker flow, or a suggestion that we should increase it, should be challenged on the grounds that it is imposing unfair competition for scarce jobs. Instead of ?orderly flow of workers? the proper translation is "more foreign labor to take your job."

Secure the Border: They save the biggest and boldest claim for last. Amnesty advocates promise to secure the border for no other reason than to make their plans for massive amnesty more palatable. The special interests don?t mean it and they don't want to do it. After all, they have stymied every single piece of immigration enforcement legislation in recent years and relentlessly pressured the Obama administration to systematically dismantle most existing immigration enforcement.  

There is immigration enforcement and then there is amnesty.  One has nothing to do with the other. Revealing the motives of the illegal alien lobby is an ongoing responsibility because as Burke said, "a very great part of the mischiefs that vex this world arise from words."

Article
« Last Edit: June 03, 2010, 07:24:05 PM by sirs »
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Deconstructing "Comprehensive Immigration Reform"
« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2010, 07:21:52 PM »
Obama, Arizona Gov. Brewer discuss immigration
By DARLENE SUPERVILLE and SUZANNE GAMBOA

Facing off over illegal immigration, Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer told President Barack Obama that Americans "want our border secured" and called Thursday for completion of a separating fence. Obama underscored his objections that the tough immigration law she signed is discriminatory.

Meeting in the Oval Office, Obama said Arizona's law and similar efforts by more than 20 states would interfere with the federal government's responsibility to set and enforce immigration policy.

Neither side appeared to give ground on the contentious issue although both talked about seeking a bipartisan solution. Obama urged her to "be his partner" in working toward a comprehensive overhaul of the nation's badly fractured immigration system.

The unusual meeting between the president and the governor was a byprouct of Brewer's decision to sign a first-of-its-kind law requiring police enforcing other laws to check immigration status if there is reason to believe someone is in the country illegally. The law also makes being here illegally a state crime. Brewer sought the meeting and Obama, who has denounced the law, accepted.

Emerging from the half-hour Oval Office session, Brewer said Obama had assured her that most of the 1,200 National Guard troops he is sending to the U.S.-Mexico border would be going to her state.

"He assured us that the majority of those resources would be coming to Arizona," she told reporters on the White House driveway.

Brewer said she and Obama, at odds over how to control illegal immigration, also agreed to try to work together on solutions. She said White House staff would visit Arizona in a couple of weeks to continue the "very cordial discussion" she had with the president.

Outside the White House, hundreds of protesters, as unhappy with the law as they are with Obama's broken promise to overhaul a system he and others say is broken, noisily greeted the Republican governor as she arrived for the meeting.

Nearly 200 people walked in a circle on the pedestrian-only portion of Pennsylvania Avenue in front of the White House _ holding signs, chanting "Jan Brewer, shame on you!" beating drums and, in the case of one man, strumming a guitar.

The Arizona law is scheduled to take effect July 29, unless it is blocked by a court under pending legal challenges. Obama's Justice Department also is reviewing whether the law violates civil rights, with an eye toward a possible court challenge of its own.

Brewer has said she signed the law because she believes Washington had failed to do its part to protect the U.S.-Mexico border.

More than 20 states are considering similar legislation, according to the Immigration Policy Center.

The first of its kind in the U.S., Arizona's law has earned Obama's condemnation, sparked boycotts of Arizona and returned the emotionally and politically charged immigration issue back to the forefront of the national conscience.

Obama has called Arizona's law a "misdirected expression of frustration" at the federal government's inability to act.

The president favors a comprehensive approach that would both tighten access to the border and help millions of illegal immigrants in the U.S. become citizens. Some Republicans, including Brewer and Arizona Sens. Jon Kyl and John McCain, want tighter border controls first.

Obama has been more outspoken on the issue in recent weeks, restating a desire to enact a comprehensive overhaul but also reminding advocates that Democrats only have 59 votes in the Senate _ one vote short of the number needed to overcome GOP stalling tactics.

Obama has met with Republican senators and telephoned some privately, but thus far Democrats have been unable to get Republican allies to write an immigration reform bill. Some Democrats also oppose taking up immigration reform this election year.

While lawmakers and border-state governors say more federal troops are needed to fight rising violence in their states, government data obtained by The Associated Press show it actually isn't so dangerous down there after all.

The top four big U.S. cities with the lowest violent crime rates _ San Diego, Phoenix, El Paso and Austin _ are in border states, according to a new FBI report. And an internal Customs and Border Protection report shows its agents face far less danger than street cops in most U.S. cities.

Brewer said in a televised interview last weekend: "We are out here on the battlefield getting the impact of all this illegal immigration, and all the crime that comes with it." But FBI crime reports for 2009 says violent crime in Arizona declined. And violent crimes in Southwest border counties are among the lowest in the nation per capita _ they've dropped by more than 30 percent in the last two decades.

Brewer said after Thursday's meeting that she believes people across the country "want our border secured" and that she would like to see construction begin soon to complete a fence along the border.

The Obama-Brewer meeting was closed to the media, so reporters did not see them together. The White House later released an official photograph from the meeting.

Outside the White House, some protesters criticized Brewer and some criticized Obama for welcoming her to his office.

Rachel Angulo, of Tempe, Ariz., was vacationing in Washington when she learned about the protest from her Facebook friends. She said she decided to break from sightseeing to join. She wore a white T-shirt with the question "Do I look illegal?" on the front.

"I believe in security, but in a just security," said the Phoenix-born Angulo. "Just because I have on my huaraches doesn't mean I'm illegal." Huaraches are sandals.

Brent Wilkes, executive director of the League of United Latin American Citizens, said Obama should not have met with Brewer.

"She wants to advance this hypothesis the federal government will not act on immigration reform and so Arizona is taking matters into its own hands," Wilkes said. "But what she's unwilling to disclose is the reason the federal government can't act is because Gov. Brewer and her Republican colleagues have blocked us."


Yea, it's wearing huaraches that makes a person illegal    ::)
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Deconstructing "Comprehensive Immigration Reform"
« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2010, 09:12:48 PM »
Quote
Obama has called Arizona's law a "misdirected expression of frustration" at the federal government's inability to act.

Well Mr Cheif Executive , what would properly directed expression of frustration at the federal government's inability to act look like?

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Deconstructing "Comprehensive Immigration Reform"
« Reply #3 on: June 03, 2010, 09:17:12 PM »
touche'
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Deconstructing "Comprehensive Immigration Reform"
« Reply #4 on: June 03, 2010, 09:38:25 PM »
Do you ever get the feeling that President Obama is almost just about to , kinda , sorta nearly... get it?

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Deconstructing "Comprehensive Immigration Reform"
« Reply #5 on: June 04, 2010, 03:39:58 AM »
No.  Not in the least.  Clueless in fact
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle