How the GOP created Donald Trump

[Xavier_Onassis]

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/11/opinion/the-gop-created-donald-trump.html?smid=fb-share&_r=0

[sirs]

Actually, how the GOP "created" Trump has already been explained adnausem.  It's largely why Sanders is doing so well against the Clinton juggernaught.  The people are sick and tired of how policitians get themselves elected, only to throw their constiuents who got them there, under the bus.  The people are ANGRY with DC politicians and their SOP.  Nothing to do with racists or bigots or anything else so typecast by leftist talking points.  It's plain anger, as many of the exit polls made abundantly clear

[Xavier_Onassis]

If Trump, who is a bigot and an ignoramus  who picks fights uselessly with everyone, gets elected, they will have reason to REALLY angry. And the rest of us will mad at them for electing the Egomaniac Trump.

[sirs]

And what would REALLY make the country even ANGRIER were if it were to elect an angry, incompotent, irresponsponsible, corrupt, criminal, who condescends incessantly with everyone

And the rest of us will be mad at them for electing the Corrupt Clinton

[Plane]

   I think it is true that there is a sort of exhaustion twards the "establishment" politicians.

    Trump , Sanders and Carson qualify to benefit tho I wish heartily that Carson was benefiting much more than he is .

    This feeling will not be entirely dissipated in the election of a Clinton or a Bush, if the elected president is visibly connected to the past like this , how will the public animosity be coped with?

[Xavier_Onassis]

No matter who is elected president, he/she will be accused of violating this or that.

Trump would be much, much worse than Hillary.

[sirs]

Based on record and compotence alone, that opinion is largely debunked

[Plane]

No matter who is elected president, he/she will be accused of violating this or that.

Trump would be much, much worse than Hillary.

Can't see why.

Based on past history Trump will stamp the Trump brand on a lot of stuff and have his visage carved on multiple mountains.
Donald Trump is liable to leave creditors holding the bag.
Hillary will set up the government to educate you and make all of your decisions for you while gathering a lot of cash for herself. Hillary is liable to tax and spend with abandon.

Which way is worse?

[Xavier_Onassis]

There is NO WAY I will vote for Trump. He is fucking ignorant and would be the worst president ever.

He is incapable of compromise. He would grandstand  every issue in his typical name calling demagogic manner.

Hillary would be something like a cross between the Bill Clinton and the Baack Obama presidencies. Something we have lived through, that was superior to the Bush years in nearly every respect.

[sirs]

He is fucking ignorant and would be the worst president ever.

He is incapable of compromise. He would grandstand  every issue in his typical name calling demagogic manner.

Wow....impressively ironic.  You just described our current President. 

[Plane]

Hillary would be something like a cross between the Bill Clinton and the Baack Obama presidencies.

As bad as that sounds , I do not think it a safe assumption that it would not be worse.

[Xavier_Onassis]

Trump would obviously be a disaster.

He does not have the personality for the job. He is obnoxious and bellicose and a raving egomaniac.

[sirs]

While that was a closer description of the Democrat's current leading nominee for President.

[Plane]

Trump would obviously be a disaster.

He does not have the personality for the job. He is obnoxious and bellicose and a raving egomaniac.

Yes.
Pretty good description.
Not my favorite either.

But why is this a disaster worse than a completely boneheaded Clinton?

[Xavier_Onassis]

Clinton is hard "completely boneheaded". 

She has experience in the White House and in diplomacy. Trump has neither. He would be d=far worse, and anyone with a brain can understand why.