Why shouldn't urban areas have more say since they have more people?
Because this is the
United States of America. Not the United states of California/New York/Texas, or the United State of Urban America.
Because it's far too easy for politicians to pander to those urbanites, and with a quid-pro-quo, push legisative and executive decisions completely contradictory to the welfare and needs of those evil pastural puritans.
The President is the President of ALL the states, even the rural ones, and as such rural America should have just as much
representative say as urban America....which the Electoral College does to a fair degree.
And as Professor has already referenced, by all means initiate a Constitutional convention to amend the Constitution, if you don't like it. And while you're at it, best use the time to add how the Fed should provide Universal healthcare, so that there's no longer any confusion as what the Fed should be providing vs simply promoting
Isn't that how democracy works, one man = one vote regardless of where he lives?
Yea, it does quite well, at the state & local level, where one's constituencies are much more specific. Thankfully, we don't run this country via mob rule