Tea-Partiers Spit on "nigger" and "faggot" Congress Critters

[Michael Tee]

<<There are two problems with the logic in this thread.

<<1. That if the words were uttered that it reflects in any way on the tea partiers as a whole.>>

OF COURSE it reflect on the tea parties?   What other group attracts such vehement racists to its ranks?

<<and

<<2. That the CBC is singled out as a target of any tea party ire.>>

It ISN'T the CBC that's singled out, the Tea Parties are racists, they hate ALL blacks, not just the CBC.

<<Labeling folks as racist is a well worn demonization tactic, doesn't matter if the charges are true, what it does is deflect from the real issues and garner sympathy for those with no realistic responses to the issues raised.>>

Well, that's probably true because the issues still need to be debated on the merits.  But if they're racists, they should be called on it anyway, because I think a large part of the anger and resentment is that they feel the reforms are at their expense and for the benefit of racial minorities.

[sirs]

Labeling folks as racist is a well worn demonization tactic, doesn't matter if the charges are true, what it does is deflect from the real issues and garner sympathy for those with no realistic responses to the issues raised.

BINGO

[sirs]

[BT]

It ISN'T the CBC that's singled out, the Tea Parties are racists, they hate ALL blacks, not just the CBC.

Wrong again. It isn't about Black, it's about Green.

[sirs]

Great Vid on Laura Ingram doing a double Whammy...hitting Matt Lauer on MSM bias, AND the effort the MSM tries to pull, analogus to Tee's rock from a water effort, in trying to paint the Tea Partiers as a supposed buch of angry racists

[Plane]

<<This is you admitting that the earwitness testimony cannot be reliable.

<<Not a single word was intelligable, in spite of several mikes being present you have been admitting this all along.>>

Don't you see that you have just assumed the superiority of the mikes being used, over the human ear?  Can't you admit the possibility that no mike could pick out a single word from the din but that a human ear could easily do so at close quarters? 

If the Quarters were close then the cameras present would have cought the shouter some few of the fifteen times.

How can you claim that all fifteen shouts of a single sort of word were clearly heard while all other words were garbled by the croud noise?

I see you claiming the human ear being superior to some mikes as possibly true , but you are  also claiming that the mikes present were the inferior sort and that the shouter was in closer proximity to the listener than to the mike. You are makeing a case on a lot of assumptions that are not all of them likely.

Because the group of congressmen were surrounded by professional reporters they were surrounded by professional reporting equipment very likely to be high quality.

Professional Mikes can be designed to be quite directional preferring sound that comes down their barrell , they are aimable, naturally they would have been aimed at the congressmen most of the time , but the surrounding reporters would have been also aiming such microphones at the croud on the other side of the congressmen , by surrounding them they would have automaticly have aimed at much of the croud.

None of the cameramen , sound men or reporters heard the "n"word being said even once, and they were co-located in juxtaposition to the event, letting it go unrecorded when it would have paid them very well to record it. If the microphone and camera carring people had heard the "N" word they would have not only have said so , they would have turned their cameras and microphones to record it.

These famous congressmen , veterans of freedom marches , are quite old compared to the reporters and cameramen and sound men.

So your case does not only require that the microphones present were few or cheap or quite directional or aimed the wrong way the whole time , the case you must make also is that old human ears are more sensitive than young human ears, something almost any hearing aid user could testify to the contary.

[Michael Tee]

<<Because the group of congressmen were surrounded by professional reporters they were surrounded by professional reporting equipment very likely to be high quality.

<<Professional Mikes can be designed to be quite directional preferring sound that comes down their barrell , they are aimable, naturally they would have been aimed at the congressmen most of the time , but the surrounding reporters would have been also aiming such microphones at the croud on the other side of the congressmen , by surrounding them they would have automaticly have aimed at much of the croud.

<<None of the cameramen , sound men or reporters heard the "n"word being said even once, and they were co-located in juxtaposition to the event, letting it go unrecorded when it would have paid them very well to record it. If the microphone and camera carring people had heard the "N" word they would have not only have said so , they would have turned their cameras and microphones to record it.>>

LMAO.  And it's plane claiming that I am the one whose opinion is based on a lot of assumptions.  You also seem to neglect the likelihood that the sound reporters wear earphones and "hear" through the mikes what the mikes hear and don't hear what the mikes don't hear.   

Also, let's finally get this "surrounded" bullshit out of the way.  How many reporters in all do you see "surrounding" the Congressmen and how many do you see pointing mikes?

[Plane]

Also, let's finally get this "surrounded" bullshit out of the way.  How many reporters in all do you see "surrounding" the Congressmen and how many do you see pointing mikes?

One would have been suffecient , if his ears had been the equal of the septgenarian congressmen who heard the "N" word.

Why would a reporter wear earphones that prevented his hearing the event he was in the midst of?

[sirs]

Against Obamacare? You're a fascist racist hater

Posted: April 01, 2010

Differences of opinion and ideology, passionately held, drive the opposition to Obamacare.

Yet to shut down the effort to overturn Obamacare's unpopular assault on freedom and prosperity, the left resorts to a frequently employed tactic. They and their media co-conspirators find whack jobs holding stupid signs ? or saying or doing stupid things ? and say, "See! Right-wing intolerance, hatred and racism fuel this movement."

Idiots, wing nuts and haters exist ? on both sides of the political spectrum ? in a country of 300 million people. Those who threaten and engage in violence should be arrested and prosecuted. Those who use incendiary language should be denounced.

But which "hater" said the following, and where was the condemnation?

"The (George W.) Bush administration and the Nazi and Communist regimes all engaged in the politics of fear. ... Indeed, the Bush administration has been able to improve on the techniques used by the Nazi and Communist propaganda machines." Was it
a) Miss Piggy,
b) Lady Gaga,
c) the Dog Whisperer,
d) George Soros, billionaire Democratic supporter?

"(George W. Bush's) executive branch has made it a practice to try and control and intimidate news organizations, from PBS to CBS to Newsweek. ... And every day, they unleash squadrons of digital brownshirts to harass and hector any journalist who is critical of the president."
a) Dan Rather,
b) Katie Couric,
c) Helen Thomas,
d) Al Gore, Nobel laureate.

"(Republicans are) coming for our children. They're coming for the poor. They're coming for the sick, the elderly and the disabled."
a) Mother Teresa,
b) the Grim Reaper,
c) Jack Bauer,
d) Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga.

The contest between Democrats and Republicans is "a struggle of good and evil. And we're the good."
a) Wolverine,
b) Spider-Man,
c) RoboCop,
d) Howard Dean, then-Democratic national chairman.

When asked whether the number and prominence of blacks in the Bush administration suggested a lack of racism, he said, "Hitler had a lot of Jews high up in the hierarchy of the Third Reich."
a) Adolf Eichmann,
b) Joseph Goebbels,
c) Heinrich Himmler,
d) Harry Belafonte, entertainer and liberal activist.

He called President Bush's perceived lack of help for Katrina victims "ethnic cleansing by inaction" and called it a "calculated ... policy." He added, "So by simply not doing anything to alleviate this ... crisis that was so greatly exaggerated by Katrina, they let the hurricane do the ethnic cleansing, and their hands are clean."
a) David Duke,
b) Jack the Ripper,
c) Jeffrey Dahmer,
d) Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass.

"When you look at the way the (then-Republican-controlled) House of Representatives has been run, it has been run like a plantation. And you know what I'm talking about."
a) Kunta Kinte,
b) Harriet Tubman,
c) Booker T. Washington,
d) then-Sen. Hillary Clinton, former first lady and current secretary of state.

"George Bush let people die on rooftops in New Orleans because they were poor and because they were black."
a) Ming the Merciless,
b) Ivan the Terrible,
c) Vlad the Impaler,
d) Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo.

"It's not 'spic' or 'nigger' anymore. (Instead, Republicans) say, 'Let's cut taxes.'"
a) Bernie Madoff,
b) Bonnie and Clyde,
c) Bennie and the Jets,
d) Rep. Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y.

"You're damn right; Dick Cheney's heart's a political football. We ought to rip it out and kick it around and stuff it back in him."
a) Dr. Seuss,
b) Dr. Oz,
c) Dr. J,
d) Ed Schultz, MSNBC and radio host.

"We are in danger. The extreme right wing has seized the government. Tonight (John) Ashcroft and the CIA and the FBI and Homeland Security and the IRS can work together. So look out, because without a definition of who is a terrorist, anyone can be. ... Martin Luther King could have been. ... The right-wing media, the FBI ? they are targeting our leadership."
a) Mr. T,
b) Flavor Flav,
c) Gary Coleman,
d) the Rev. Jesse Jackson.

"And what we are dealing with right now in this country is whether we are having a kind of bloodless, silent coup or not. ... (George W. Bush) is trying to bring to himself all the power to become an emperor ? to create Empire America."
a) Darth Vader,
b) Satan,
c) the Rev. Pat Robertson,
d) Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash.

Lanny Davis, former special counsel to President Bill Clinton, campaigned for Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut. Lieberman, despite his reliably left-wing voting record, infuriated the left for supporting the Iraq War. Davis found himself on the receiving end of "hate and vitriol of bloggers on the liberal side of the aisle" and "their extremism, bigotry and intolerance." A friend and fellow Lieberman supporter, said Davis, became "fearful for his physical safety."

"I held on to the view," Davis admitted, "that the left was inherently more tolerant and less hateful than the right. ... I have reluctantly concluded that I was wrong. The far right does not have a monopoly on bigotry and hatred and sanctimony."

The majority of Americans oppose Obamacare. Their opposition is not racist, fascist or intolerant. Let us work to prevail.


Oldest trick in the Dem playbook

[Amianthus]

You forgot one: "(Japanese) Anime is a prime example of why two nukes just wasn't enough." - Nick Levasseur (D) New Hampshire

This is the same guy who posted this on his MySpace page:

"My Interests

"Medicine, biology, mathematics, anything that doesn't involve Organic Chemistry, cars that don't begin with "Ford" and end with "Aspire", HBO series, Bill Mahar, politics, the hunting of neo-conservative Reaganites (a shooting sport brought to you by the republican party in more ways than one!), sleeping (it is sad when necessary life takes become occational hobbies)."

[sirs]

But....but....it's the right & the Tea Partiers that are all intolerant, and..and....hate filled......and..and racist, and...and supportive of violence & vandalism.  I mean the lack of such evidence is proof positive.  No?

[kimba1]

Japanese) Anime is a prime example of why two nukes just wasn't enough."

wow
that`s new
gotta tell that to a bubby of mine who owns a anime convention.

[Michael Tee]

<<Why would a reporter wear earphones that prevented his hearing the event he was in the midst of?>>

Obviously because he's commenting on the events which include the angry shouting mob and he wants to hear what his listeners will be hearing, so that his comments will make sense in that context.

[Michael Tee]

<<the hunting of neo-conservative Reaganites (a shooting sport brought to you by the republican party in more ways than one!)>>

Sounds to me like a dig at Cheney's hunting prowess, or lack of it.  The guy is obviously a not-too-successful humorist, who only a bunch of wacko right-wing nut-jobs would ever take as a threat.

[sirs]

Notice how smoothly Tee rationalizes hate speech from the left.....merely a "not-to'successful humorist"  Move along, nothing here to see.

Notice how he couldn't manage to rationalize away all the above noted hate speech coming from a plethora of leftists

Which is to say, the right doesn't have their own extremists and radicals.  I dare anyone on the left to conclude that's not been a concession on the right.  The problem is leftists who refuse to see the hatred, right under their own nose.  Hatred and racism, including actual death threats, that gets neatly compartmentalized, so we can all jump up and down at supposed "radicals" that supposedly make up the core constituency of folks like the Tea Partiers

Gotta distract the populace, some how