Disgraceful Planned Parenthood

[Xavier_Onassis]

They are not babies. They are fetuses.

And here is how many rights they have

ZERO, ZILCH, BUPKISS or whatever rights their future mothers, who have absolute control over them, choose to give them.

[sirs]

And blacks weren't weren't persons either.  Nor did they have rights

Dredd Scott, all over again.  Are you wearing your Plantation's hat, at least?

[Xavier_Onassis]

If you think a 24 week old blastocyst is a human, you are simply delusional.

Which you are.

[Plane]

If you think a 24 week old blastocyst is a human, you are simply delusional.

Which you are.

  How about a "fetus" whose head must be crushed in order to harvest her liver intact?

    This is a human head , with human features on the outside and a human brain on the inside.

      Planned Parenthood does not care , this makes them seem very hard hearted.

[Xavier_Onassis]

Any moral issue is the responsibility of the woman in question, because the fetus is part of HER body. Not yours, not the government's, HERS.
The time has past for governments and men to judge women as property.

You can blather about this forever, but I am entirely convinced that I and 100% right and you are 100% wrong, wrong wrong.

[sirs]

And any moral issue is the responsibility of the Plantation owner in question, because the slave is part of HIS property, not the Government

Yea, that fits as well

[Xavier_Onassis]

Yeah, sure.

Pregnant women are just like de Massa, and fetuses are just like the slaves.

GO back to analogy school, sirs, you crapped out on this one.
Jeez!

[sirs]

Precisely.....today's unborn children are yesterday's slaves.  In particular how the left MUST portray these children as mere "fetuses", in order to justify their amorality

[Xavier_Onassis]

Fetuses are IN NO WAY like slaves. They are not unpaid laborers. Unpaid labor is the basis of slavery. That is the entire purpose of slavery.

Your neurons seem to have gone South.

[sirs]

Not talking about their function....we're talking about how they were classified....as less than human, as property of the plantation owner, or in this case, the woman who would rather kill it than put it to work, since he/she is too small for any labor

[Xavier_Onassis]

Fetuses are BY DEFINITION less than human, just as caterpillars are less than butterflies, and tadpoles are less than frogs.

Whatever the fuck they are, let the woman decide for herself, nor some smartass dip in San Diego who thinks he has been named the Moral Authority of the Universe. Fetuses do not belong to you, you have nothing to do with them, they have never lived in your body.

And they are unrelated to slaves.

[sirs]

And slaves, BY DEFINITION, back in the days of slave trade, were also less than human

And no, a fetus doesn't go into some cocoon and then come out a human.  They're conceived as a human, grow as a human, and are born as a human.  Apparently not only did you skip Civics, & U.S. History, you apparently skipped biology as well

Your plantation hat appears to be getting tighter

[Xavier_Onassis]

You can entertain any supidass fantasy that you wish, sirs.

When the little men in white coats come to take you away, remember what I told you: you are batshit crazy and seriously obsessed.

[sirs]

Biology isn't fantasy, I'm afraid.  And your say so doesn't make any thing factually so.  Sorry to burst those bubbles

[Plane]

Any moral issue is the responsibility of the woman in question, because the fetus is part of HER body. Not yours, not the government's, HERS.
The time has past for governments and men to judge women as property.

You can blather about this forever, but I am entirely convinced that I and 100% right and you are 100% wrong, wrong wrong.

   You have skipped the step in which by logic or evidence you demonstrate that a fetus is in no way human .

   .....and that is my favorite part.