2604
« on: October 23, 2006, 12:50:48 AM »
This is a convivial group most of the time , many joyfull hours I have spent in friendly argument with people who could never agree with me , but who could use their skills of argument to spar with me in a friendly manner.
But we have a tacit agreement don't we ?
We assume the humanity and human feelings of each other , and we know that we aren't here to do harm.
Every now and then we loose someone who can't tolerate us or who can't stand the rules , but the rules are not onerous here.
What would the the proper limit though for a genuine difference of opinion in a posting member who was tolerant enough to follow the rules ?
Suppose a serious disciple of Osama Bin Laden was here saying that he would regretfully have to kill us all until we saw the error of our ways and turned to Islam?
What if a real member of the actual Nazi party were to expound on the need to controll the "mud People " and the duplicity of the ZOG?
What about a Communist , a KKK officer , a Russian gangster , a Columbian or Jamaican gun man.
Hey, there is no barrier to Hugo Chavez or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad from coming in here and very politely telling us how nasty we are.
Could we put up with something like that?
What does a mature sort of person do when confronted with a philosophy so incompatible whit his own ?