From BT:
? Reply #16 on: November 13, 2010, 07:29:29 PM ?
No he is a columnist. I was wrong. He was a reporter at one time, assigned to the WH during the Bush Admin.[/color]
From YOU:
? Reply #17 on: November 13, 2010, 07:33:30 PM ?
I'm guessing like you, most people, including the Post might consider Milbanks a reporter
Now back to the original questions
Notice the time?
Did YOU?
? Reply #23 on:
November 15, 2010, 12:04:05 AM ? Quote Modify
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: BT on November 14, 2010, 11:07:05 PM
Is Milbanks a journalist?It would seem no longer. Now, back to my original questions, if you don't mind
____________________________________________
Notice my concession to your clarification. Notice how I referenced your initial
BELIEF, then you were able to clairify where you were WRONG in that belief, with what the Post had designated him as, and my subsequent acknowledgement of that?? Why are you continuing to dig this hole??
Notice also when I refute these claims of yours, I provide both the context and the time via the links. I don't simply place 2 links and say "there". Now, where's that concession that I'm not pushing for a predominat conservative bias? Coming anytime soon?
As far as your call for increased conservative bias,
SEE, did it again. Right there for all to see
there aren't many options left when you take legislative action off the table yet decry the gross imbalance in the bias. You either lessen the left leaning bias (how you do not say) or you increase the right leaning bias in order to achieve that all important balance you seem to be worried about.
OR, you actually do what I'm doing, continue to highlight the gross imbalance, and allow those to see and read those highlights to become better educated to said imbalance. And perhaps with enough grassroots outrage, facilitate an internal change, free of any legislation or mandated equal bias, aka the Fairness Doctrine