Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - sirs

Pages: 1 ... 1790 1791 [1792] 1793 1794 ... 1806
26866
3DHS / Re: Dealing with some of those terms: Islamofascism
« on: September 28, 2006, 06:10:44 PM »
Plane specifically stated that the militant Islam philosophy was not sprung from fascism. That doesn't sound like a fascist foundation to me at all.

I think we're getting semantically confused.  Militant Islam has a foundation of Fascism.  That doesn't however mean that it "sprung from facsism".  A subtle but distinct difference

So you agree that there is no scholarly reasoning for claiming that Islamists are Fascists?

No.

26867
Poochmeister....where you been hiding, ya old dog?     ;)

26868
3DHS / Re: Dealing with some of those terms: Islamofascism
« on: September 28, 2006, 05:05:54 PM »
No one's claiming that Islamo fascists have a specific critieria they must adhere to.  As Plane & myself have plainly demonstrated, militant islam has a fascist-like foundation in both actions & rhetoric.  If you want to demean such as "touchy feely", well, you have a right to that opinion.  Is it Hitler-Nazi II?, No.  It's Militant Islam I

26869
3DHS / Re: Dealing with some of those terms: Islamofascism
« on: September 28, 2006, 04:35:48 PM »
Not deal with it?  I wrote quite an extensive post on it, thank you

True, that was a tad unfair, in that you did spend some quality time providing us your opinion as to why the term Islamofascism is supposedly inappropriate.  My apologies

When I see a quality comparison of fascism and the Islamists then I'll be impressed.

Been there done that, by both myself and Plane.  I think you what you're looking for is a substantive rebuttal, to your rebuttals, since the posts extensively articulating the accuracy of the term has been made.

26870
3DHS / Re: I wish some of you would get your terms right
« on: September 28, 2006, 03:15:08 PM »
That would indicate that the question is asking if you agree with Plane's view of a democratic society.

I'll have to get back to you on that, since I'm more in agreement with my view of a "Democratic Society", and will need more time, to read in more detail, his view

26871
3DHS / Re: Dealing with some of those terms: Islamofascism
« on: September 28, 2006, 03:12:45 PM »
Being "overused" is a subjective opinion. That's up to you.  Misused is not.

That would be your subjective opinion, I'm afraid Js, and appears to be clearly being misused in the effort to cast the term Islamofascism aside, and not even dwell on it.

Islamofascism clearly qualifies as a jargon word when the everyday English word (and older equivalent) would be: Islamist or Radical Islam

Still waiting then for the "everyday English equivalent", since the current term of Islamofascism is still the most appropriate, vs the much more vague "militant islam"

26872
3DHS / Re: I wish some of you would get your terms right
« on: September 28, 2006, 02:30:43 PM »
Do you agree Sirs?

Agree to what specifically?  To Plane's deductions?  Yours?   Again, my time for any detailed responses is limited, until this evening

26873
3DHS / Re: Dealing with some of those terms: Islamofascism
« on: September 28, 2006, 02:28:39 PM »
Currently Js, I don't have the time to respond in any detail to your opinion on the op-ed.  However, my reference to "newspeak" being overused/misused remains valid.  I will endeavor to respond in greater detail to your commentary sometime this evening

26874
3DHS / Re: Dealing with some of those terms: Islamofascism
« on: September 28, 2006, 01:32:22 PM »
I'd like to add the word "newspeak" to that list of overused & misused words thread

26875
3DHS / Re: Off A Cliff....BINGO
« on: September 28, 2006, 01:11:47 PM »
The root question should be settled first , are we fighting a war or apprehending criminals?Don't say both , the systems for dealing with one are incompatible with the systems developed for the other.[/move]

26876
3DHS / Re: Off A Cliff
« on: September 28, 2006, 02:40:26 AM »

26877
3DHS / Hey Hugo, fire your speech writers
« on: September 28, 2006, 02:38:10 AM »
Did Democrats write Chavez's speech?
Posted: September 28, 2006

Hugo Chavez, president of Venezuela, used his United Nations address to repeatedly refer to President Bush as a "devil." Immediately, and vigorously, two prominent Democrats defended Bush and lambasted Chavez for maligning "their" president.

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi called Chavez "an everyday thug." "You don't come into my country, you don't come into my congressional district, and you don't condemn my president," said Rep. Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y. Yes, the same Rangel who, after the Supreme Court ruled in Bush's favor in the 2000 presidential election, pronounced the decision an "injustice." With this newfound patriotic fervor, Democrats lashed into Hugo Chavez. Why, how dare he criticize President Bush in a demeaning, brutal fashion!

Here's the question. Where were the neo-defenders of Bush when Democrats repeatedly, and viciously, said virtually the same thing as did Chavez? Let's go to the videotape ...

Hugo Chavez: ""I think we could call a psychiatrist to analyze yesterday's statement made by the president of the United States. As the spokesman of imperialism, he came to share his nostrums, to try to preserve the current pattern of domination, exploitation and pillage of the peoples of the world."

Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y.: "I sometimes feel as though Alfred E. Neuman is in charge in Washington."

Chavez: "... [T]he American empire is doing all it can to consolidate its system of domination. And we cannot allow them to do that. We cannot allow world dictatorship to be consolidated."

Former President Jimmy Carter: "Regardless of the costs, there are determined efforts by top U.S. leaders to exert American imperial dominance throughout the world. These revolutionary policies have been orchestrated by those who believe that our nation's tremendous power and influence should not be internationally constrained."

Chavez: "The government of the United States doesn't want peace. It wants to exploit its system of exploitation, of pillage, of hegemony through war."

Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass.: "Week after week after week after week, we were told lie after lie after lie after lie. And now, despite the increasingly restless Iraqi population, the administration still refuses to face the truth, or to tell the truth."

Chavez: "The world parent's statement – cynical, hypocritical, full of this imperial hypocrisy from the need they have to control everything."

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass.: "Their plan is lie and die. And that's what they're doing. They lie to America about what's happening on the ground, they lie about why we're there, they lie about what's happening."

Chavez: "I have the feeling, dear world dictator, that you are going to live the rest of your days as a nightmare because the rest of us are standing up, all those who are rising up against American imperialism, who are shouting for equality, for respect, for the sovereignty of nations."

Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa.: "Our troops [in Haditha] ... killed innocent civilians in cold blood." (Murtha said this before there was an investigation. He later apologized.)

Chavez: "How cynical can you get? What a capacity to lie shamefacedly."

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev: Bush is a "loser" and a "liar." [/i] (Reid later apologized for loser, not liar.)

Chavez: "The hegemonic pretensions of the American empire are placing at risk the very survival of the human species. We continue to warn you about this danger and we appeal to the people of the United States and the world to halt this threat, which is like a sword hanging over our heads."

Pelosi: "We have a situation where we have two oilmen in the White House, and we have gasoline at over $3 a barrel. Surprise, surprise." She probably meant $3 a gallon. Or maybe she hasn't pumped her own gas lately. Or, how about: "And I'm here to say that when the oilmen, George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, strode into town, the showdown began between Big Oil and the consumer. Big Oil won."

Chavez: "Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, from this rostrum, the president of the United States, the gentleman to whom I refer as the devil, came here, talking as if he owned the world. Truly. As the owner of the world."

Michael Moore, the guy the Democrats granted a seat next to former President Jimmy Carter during the Democratic National Convention, called President Bush a "deserter," said "there is no terrorist threat" and denounced the war in Iraq, arguing that America entered into it because of "the oil companies, Israel, Halliburton."

Memo to Chavez, ruler of a country increasingly impoverished due to his policies: Save some money. Fire your speechwriter and just transcribe to Spanish the sound bites from Howard Dean and company.

Sean Penn recently called the president "Beelzebub [Satan] – and a dumb one." How long before the actor, now appearing in the movie flop "All the King's Men," sues Chavez – for plagiarism?


http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52182


26878
3DHS / Re: Gas prices are plummeting, yet...
« on: September 28, 2006, 02:02:51 AM »

26879
3DHS / Re: Shaping the Topic: the NIE memo
« on: September 28, 2006, 01:52:13 AM »

26880
3DHS / Re: Great example of someone with severe BDS
« on: September 28, 2006, 01:47:55 AM »
No      ;)

Pages: 1 ... 1790 1791 [1792] 1793 1794 ... 1806