Author Topic: That Journalistic Toilet, called the NY Times  (Read 1106 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
That Journalistic Toilet, called the NY Times
« on: February 22, 2008, 03:52:33 AM »
New York Times' Hit Job On McCain:
"Slide Into the Journalistic Toilet"
 
ALEXANDRIA, VA. --- With nothing more than nine-year-old gossip from shadowy, unnamed sources, the New York Times last night journalistically assaulted Senator John McCain, whom they endorsed for President, with a 3,000 word attempt to create out of whole cloth an improper sexual relationship between McCain and lobbyist Vicki Iseman.

Full of innuendo and devoid of facts, this nearly decade-old ?news? story contains nothing new and nothing newsworthy. It serves only as the lowest form of smarmy political attack.

Brent Bozell issued the following statement:  It is beyond appalling that the New York Times continues its steady slide into the journalistic toilet with such a spurious, and so patently politically motivated, hit job. A ten-year old piece of gossip, with no evidence whatsoever -- this is what qualifies for "news" at this disgrace of a newspaper,? stated Brent Bozell, president of the Media Research Center.


NYT Enquirer

"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Rich

  • Guest
Re: That Journalistic Toilet, called the NY Times
« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2008, 12:46:02 PM »
We all know the Times is nothing but anti-American kitty litter. This just shows you how truly corrupt and dispicable liberals can be.

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: That Journalistic Toilet, called the NY Times
« Reply #2 on: February 22, 2008, 03:02:55 PM »
With nothing more than nine-year-old gossip from shadowy, unnamed sources, the New York Times last night journalistically assaulted Senator John McCain, whom they endorsed for President, with a 3,000 word attempt to create out of whole cloth an improper sexual relationship between McCain and lobbyist Vicki Iseman.

===================================
Let's get this straight...they ENDORSED him,and then they ran this story? This story is ancient. They must have been doing him a real favor by doodling around and printing nothing about this for so many years.

McCain did know this woman, so it is not of the "whole cloth", since the fact that he knew her and they hung out for a while is at least a small piece of said metaphorical cloth. If Obama or Hillary had similar encounters with lobbyists of the opposite sex, they'd have printed that too.

At least they did not spread the word around that McCain had a Black love child from some affair with a Black woman as Rove did in 2000. The NY Times is less reprehensible than Juniorbush, then.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: That Journalistic Toilet, called the NY Times
« Reply #3 on: February 22, 2008, 03:25:29 PM »
McCain did know this woman, so it is not of the "whole cloth", since the fact that he knew her and they hung out for a while is at least a small piece of said metaphorical cloth. If Obama or Hillary had similar encounters with lobbyists of the opposite sex, they'd have printed that too.

Possibly........on page A29, left hand bottom corner, just below the story of some man assaulted by 75year old woman for looking at her strangely.  "Knowing" someone doesn't equate to anything other than that.  I know a Hall of Fame catcher's wife.  So?????

This is SUPPOSED to be a bread and butter example of an objective Newspaper outlet.  The fact they go far out of their way to print this on McCain, just keeps reinforcing what most rationally minded folks already knew.....to the Times; GOP bad...Dems good  Right is bad....left is good.  If it happens to be a liberal GOP, well, if it's running against any Dem, then GOP supercedes their being left.....GOP bad.....run a 17+ year old gossip story on the front page, devoid of ANY validating facts, and call it news
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: That Journalistic Toilet, called the NY Times
« Reply #4 on: February 22, 2008, 03:50:40 PM »
You can read any newspaper you wish. If McCain wants to sue, he can do so.
This story is much less than a complete fabrication, and I don't even think that if McCain (at the age of 70, puh-leeze) diddled this woman it would make him ineligible to be president.

I think we can trust the public to put this story in perspective.

Or perhaps does someone need to hire Ken Starr to get to the bottom of this?

I have already decided that Matt Drudge, Faux News and Rush Limbaugh are biased sources of news, and no longer pay any attention to them. I bet if you closed your eyes and wished REALLY hard (like Peter Pan asks the audience to do in Peter Pan when Tinkerbell stops jingling) that you could also ignore the NY Times.


"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: That Journalistic Toilet, called the NY Times
« Reply #5 on: February 22, 2008, 03:53:07 PM »
------------------------------------------------------->



















See that, Xo?  That was the point of the commentary zooming far over your head.  Try not to hurt your neck
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle