DebateGate

Largely because they were lacking in both frequency & abhorency , not to mention a prominent name, such as a celebrity

Naaa, I disagree again.  Any other head, she'd simply be criticized for poor taste in her humor.  She did this with the President's head.  That's sooooooo far across the line, that she deserves all the financial repercussions she gets....especially as she trys to play the victim card

But more to the point, you point to Griffen as an apparent GOP double standard, by their lack of outrage at ...... "just regular people"?.  IIRC, the GOP and especially conservatives, have been vehemently opposed and outraged at all manner of racist rhetoric.  But unless you can point a finger at someone specific, you're not going to get an equal level of outrage....because there's no specific target of that outrage.  So no, the right doesn't simply shrug this off.  Their condemnations are broad based because there are so few on the right that have adopted such reckless & abhorrent behavior, as personified by Griffen,

Nor should you.  Whatever faults he may be demonstrating, he was, and still is, a superior option to that of the ridiculously currupt & incompotent Clinton

Bingo

I'd love to talk to some of these people who think Hitler simply made some "bad choices"

He was investigating if trump actually has ties with Russia.  Which is strange he also the reason Hillary lost votes.  So he's not exactly biased in his investigation

I have to disagree, to this point, Kimba.....Comey was in charge of an agency that was investigating if Trump actually has ties with Russia.  The agency is still there....its not going away.  The investigation will continue, with or without Comey

Bottom line for me, based on everything I've read, and listened to, to this point.....Comey has impeccable levels of integrity, but thanks to Lynch, Clinton, & Co, got dragged into politicizing the one branch, that MUST stay apolitical.  Thanks to that infamous meet between the sitting AG, and the former President, not to mention, husband of the then current Presidential candidate, under FBI investigation, he was put between a rock and hard place.  His biggest error was applying parameters to Federal law, that were never there...that of intent.  Simply acknowledge that there was plenty there for an indictment of Mrs Clinton, and punt it to the Justice dept, and let them claim that no prosecuting attorney would think there wasn't a case to be won.  Alas, he chose to pull the FBI into the political arena, and set the ball in motion as to his eventual & appropriate termination

That said, Trump & co handled his firing extremely poorly.  Trump needs to grasp that he's President now, not CEO of the Country.  There's protocols in place, not to mention respectful means to terminate someone's position in Government.  Its as if Trump has no concept about optics or timing.  That doesn't mean he has to play the PC game, far from it.  He simply needs to think/consider actions, before demanding they be implemented immediately.  Be it EO's or any further firings.

I don't have a problem with Comey being fired.  I do have a problem with how it was done

I agree.... I see them as 2 distinct groups....both evil however.  And yet, would we ever see an effort to normalize someone who supports naziism, to be considered for public office??  Yet, here in CA, as radical as the legislature has been enabled to be, we now have a bill to make it perfectly ok for individuals who are card carrying communists, legal to be elected or even appointed, to public office.

Now, let me make it clear, my issue here isn't that communists may be allowed to run the state of CA (the majority liberals in Sacramento, are practically that far left already).  My issue is WHERE'S THE OUTRAGE?  Would there not be outrage if some politician were trying to make it ok for anyone associated with the Nazi party to hold public office??  Being a member of a particular political party denotes a support of those very policies.  Has history been that vastly whitewashed??