No, the problem is your assumption of presupposing, in this case, that sirs was demanding a response. It's ironically consistent with your problem of prejudging, and incorrectly pre-labeling me, based on that wrong judgement
It'd be a stereotypical thought if someone from the far left choose to respond, and debunked my deductions. It never came, thus helping to validate it instead.
The problem is then manifested to a much higher level when your presumptions are all shown to be in error, but you insist on continuing to apply them
And that's what's really unfortunate, since the former can simply be an error in judgement. The latter apparently requires a sense of ego, that must be maintained......despite repeatedly how in error you've been demonstrated to have been in