Arizona Sheriff Arpaio Gets Favorable Audit SEPTEMBER 24, 2010
By EVAN PEREZ
A federal audit gave favorable grades to Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio for his treatment of inmates,
amid a Justice Department probe into possible discrimination by the Arizona lawman against Hispanic inmates.
Mr. Arpaio's lawyer said the audit grades from the U.S. Marshals Service show
the sheriff runs a clean operation and underscore his contention that the probe is politically motivated.
The Justice Department said in a statement that its investigation "pertains to allegations of discrimination in jails
and police practices that are not covered by the Marshals Service review."
Mr. Arpaio has gained a national reputation as an anti-illegal immigration firebrand, using his local agency to round
up undocumented immigrants and turn them over to federal officials for deportation. The 18-month Justice probe
has looked into how he treats jail inmates and whether he discriminates against Hispanics.
Hispanic and civil-liberties groups have criticized practices of Mr. Arpaio, such as using tents to house detainees
and dressing them in pink uniforms.
The Marshals Service conducted routine inspections of jail facilities operated by the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
in September 2009 and again recently. Those inspections, separate from the Justice civil-rights probe, were done
as part of agreements under which the Maricopa sheriff houses some of the Marshals Service's federal prisoners.
Mr. Arpaio's department polices much of the suburban region outside of Phoenix.
In the inspections, the Marshals Service gave Mr. Arpaio's facility "compliant" grades,
the highest mark, in all
major categories, according to the September 2009 inspection reports. In another series of inspections this month,
the Maricopa County jails received the same grades, Marshals Service spokesman Thomas Henman said.
In particular, the Maricopa County facilities received "compliant" ratings related to prevention of discrimination
against detainees, according to the 2009 reports.
The inspections cover everything from the cleanliness of kitchens and showers to health care for inmates and security.
"This deputy was impressed with the overall facility operation and cleanliness," read one passage in the September 2009
reports.
Mr. Arpaio's lawyers have cited similar high marks received after 2008 inspections by investigators from the Department
of Homeland Security to argue that the Justice Department's probe of Mr. Arpaio is without merit.
Robert Driscoll, a lawyer for Mr. Arpaio, said: "These reports are just further evidence that the DOJ's Civil Rights Division
has gone rogue, to the point of ignoring the findings of federal law enforcement and other components of the DOJ itself,
in its politically motivated pursuit of the sheriff."
One U.S. official said the Marshals' inspections are "check-box" reviews that aren't intended to be as in-depth as the
continuing civil-rights investigation, which the Justice Department has said is looking at patterns or practices.
The Justice Department began its probe of Mr. Arpaio in March 2009, and since then the two sides have been at odds
for months over his cooperation. In a lawsuit filed earlier this month seeking to compel Mr. Arpaio to turn over documents
and allow visits by investigators, Justice Department lawyers said they were probing "alleged national origin discrimination
in [Maricopa] police practices and jail operations."
The legal tussles over Mr. Arpaio's policing practicescome as the Obama administration and Arizona's state government
battle over immigration enforcement.
The Justice Department sued the state in July seeking to block enforcement of a new state law that required local police
to check the immigration status of people stopped for other possible violations. President Barack Obama said the state law
could lead to civil-rights violations.
A federal judge has suspended the most controversial parts of the Arizona law based on the Justice Department's argument
that it would infringe on federal immigration powers.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703384204575509700664903676.html?mod=WSJ_WSJ_US_News_5
