7 Lame Liberal Excuses For The 2010 Election Shellacking

[sirs]

Yea, the KO thread is a perfect example of yours, I agree.  Still waiting for this best example of mine.  Specifics please, with the astute explanation of "how"

[BT]

 

[sirs]

Didn't think you were going to find one.  Here, lemme show a specific one, one of many in the KO thread:

Absolutely.  Need to focus on that speck in someone else's eye 

That plus campaign donations are free speech.

Yea.... and? (Demonstrating immediately how this isn't a free speech issue, as I questioned your bringing it into the debate)

You are the one who said KO shouldn't have been Ko'd. What was your reasoning if not that it was a free speech issue?  (noting now not just the error in free speech, but how I'm supposedly changing my position on KO'ing, KO)

a) it wasn't me that initiated a KO KO thread
b) it's NOT a free speech issue, and never was.  It's a hypocrisy issue, and always has been (again, reinforcing what this issue has been all about)

Sure it is. (a supposed free speech issue, bold emphasis being mine)  Next thing you know you will be all in favor of Campaign Finance Reform

See?  Now, your turn.  Please demonstrate your best example of my supposed misrepresentation within the KO thread

[BT]

Gonna have defend Keith as well, on this one.  We all know what a fringe left lunatic he is.  Why on earth would it be a problem for hom to donate to some Democrats? How can that possibly "taint" Keith's supposed "objectivity" given his SOP?  Now, I can understand if there's a policy already in place that says you can't, and him having done so was merely an effort to play the old "rules don't apply to me" liberal MO, but come on, why is there a policy in the 1st place, when you hire someone who's so far left, he's nearly right?

So why are you against the policy?

[sirs]

How is that even remotely addressing your claim of misrepresentation?  When your wrong Bt, just say so.  This dog & pony deflection show is getting quite tedious to those who frequent our saloon.

If you want to start a different topic or tangent, by all means, start a new thread, and i'll respond to that

[BT]

It's really simple. You said I said this was all about free speech. And that is not what i said. Now if you want to cut or run or claim migraine disability that's fine.

This dog & pony deflection show is getting quite tedious to those who frequent our saloon.

BTW when did you get elected to be spokesperson for the saloon?
 

[sirs]

It's really simple. You said I said this was all about free speech.

And I demonstrated exactly where:

Sirs: it's NOT a free speech issue, and never was.  It's a hypocrisy issue, and always has been

Bt: Sure it is.  Next thing you know you will be all in favor of Campaign Finance Reform

Now, waiting for you to demonstrate how I misrepesented you here in the KO thread with the appropriate comments.  But if you wish to claim    disability, that's fine too

And that is not what i said. Now if you want to cut or run or claim migraine disability that's fine.

No need....reading comprehension is all that's required.  For those with a vision impairment, they may need glasses, to read that which was typed for all to see.  And for those with a speaking impairment, might i recommend a teleprompter

This dog & pony deflection show is getting quite tedious to those who frequent our saloon.

BTW when did you get elected to be spokesperson for the saloon?

Don't recall ever claiming so

[BT]

Then why are you speaking for those that frequent the saloon?

[sirs]

Yea, great specific reference to my supposed misrepresentations, requested....about 10posts ago now, and counting.     

[BT]

Then why are you speaking for those that frequent the saloon?

Your words. Why did you say them. Simple question.

[sirs]

And now we're at 12posts and counting.  Simple question, 12posts ago

[BT]

So you refuse to answer?

[sirs]

14posts now....yea, by this time, I guess that can be officially concluded as a refusal.  I guess you could claim the  disability

[BT]

Another migraine or do you detect quicksand?

[sirs]

...and we're at 16. 

For the rest of those, perhaps just noting this particular post, just go back 16responses, and you'll see what simple question hasn't been answered, and by whom. 

Here's a hint, it's actually a question that has some substance to the points being made, and not a deflection effort that has any relevence to this or any other thread