I have 2 competing conspiracy theories

[sirs]

This isn't about second guessing Obama.

This is about calling an operation flawless when it clearly wasn't.

As we've already concluded, your obsession, I mean opinion on that remedial tangent, based on your goals, has been duly noted

This thread is actually about the 2nd guessing, and post event tactics of Obama

[Kramer]

This isn't about second guessing Obama.

This is about calling an operation flawless when it clearly wasn't.

   The quibbleing is about the meaning of "flawless".

    Would you beleive ,...."Fully successful"?

i would believe successful

FULLY?

[BT]

This isn't about second guessing Obama.

This is about calling an operation flawless when it clearly wasn't.

   The quibbleing is about the meaning of "flawless".

    Would you beleive ,...."Fully successful"?

i would believe successful

FULLY?

no

[Kramer]

This isn't about second guessing Obama.

This is about calling an operation flawless when it clearly wasn't.

   The quibbleing is about the meaning of "flawless".

    Would you beleive ,...."Fully successful"?

i would believe successful

FULLY?

no

in this you are consistent.

[Plane]

This isn't about second guessing Obama.

This is about calling an operation flawless when it clearly wasn't.

   The quibbleing is about the meaning of "flawless".

    Would you beleive ,...."Fully successful"?

yeah but what about the copter crash?

I am willing to call that a flaw, but there was enough forsight used to still have all the necessacery airlift for egress even with the loss of one of the aircraft.

Good planning made what was potentially a fatal flaw,  into a glitch that could be coped with.