And here's the kicker as H takes off on his little victimhood cruise........this is a debate forum, where we discuss ideas, and challenge positions that need challenged.
Despite H's semantic dodge about what he thinks I think he thinks, let's placate it for a moment. Let's pretend that's exactly what sirs thinks H thinks about the Election Judge wearing the Obama hat...that its perfectly ok in his book. Remember, we're just pretending here. So, what's stopping the effort in commenting on the election Judge anyway?? Screw sirs, this is what, I H thinks, about it........ And go from there
You see H, you're not required to respond directly to me. When a question is asked, there may be others who are interested in hearing what your thoughts are, especially if its a legitimate issue, such as an election judge, wearing an Obama hat, while recording voters coming into vote. Not to mention the witness in the story stating they saw this "judge" hand out 2 ballots to the person in front of them. Now, did this witness say anything to anyone? Apparently to the person writing the story at least. Was she too intimidated to report it to an official at the voting spot, literally defying a Judge? Who knows, point is, it's a legitimate story. and instead of H commenting on it, he has to have a bit of a fit in erroneosly claiming what I must be thinking he must be thinking, and that gets him off the hook.
If it makes you feel better H, you don't have to defend the indefensible, like rationlizing that New Black Panthers standing outside a polling place is just fine, but KKK'ers would not. But don't think trying to pull "sirs is trying to think what I'm thinking" is going to get you off the hook of dodging a serious point made.
Enjoy your cruise
