Actually if we put muslims in internment camp may have serious benefits.

[Christians4LessGvt]

Most people in the world want to stay where they are.

Note: "Less than most" is still a hell of a lot of people!

[kimba1]

That's actually quite bad for America for not accepting refugees.  It means we're worst than other countries.  Which is true since we can't say we can protect them.

[Xavier_Onassis]

I don't think Syrian refuges would likely to be attacked in most of the US, and of course, the police are obliged to protect everyone.

======================================================
The US is not as popular as CU4 thinks it is. Of course, the Mexicans films that portray the lives of Mexicans who come to the US, both legally and legally are  rarely dubbed or even subtitled, so he would not know this.

Moving from one culture to another is always difficult for everyone. Some adapt to it easily, others do not.

[Christians4LessGvt]

The US is not as popular as CU4 thinks it is.

I know you get a major hard-on by diminishing the US any chance you get,
but you are clearly wrong once again.
The United States is the most popular immigration destination in the world.
So if we are not that popular, then what the hell is everywhere else?....lol

That's actually quite bad for America for not accepting refugees. 
It means we're worst than other countries. 

Simply rubbish and factually incorrect.

Moving from one culture to another is always difficult for everyone. Some adapt to it easily, others do not.

Again "less than most" is an incredibly huge number of people trying to get in here.




Sept. 25, 2015

1. The United States

The U.S. remains the top country for receiving migrants, taking in 989,900 in 2013. This number measures lawful permanent resident status granted and does not include migration to the U.S. by other means. These new immigrants brought the entire U.S. foreign-born population to 13 percent of the total population.

The U.S. is also the top refugee resettlement country, with an annual cap of 70,000 people per year. In 2013, the U.S. admitted 69,900 refugees, a 20 percent increase from the previous year. Secretary of State John Kerry announced Sunday that the U.S. will increase this amount in the coming years to help share the burden of the world's current migration crisis. The U.S. will take 85,000 next year and increase to 100,000 by 2017.

http://www.usnews.com/news/slideshows/5-countries-that-take-the-most-immigrants/2

[kimba1]

What rubbish? I'm talking about refusal of letting Syrian refugees in and stated we can't protect sihk from anti muslim attacks .

So it's very possible America is unsafe for these refugees

[Xavier_Onassis]

It is not that it is unimportant. It is because most of what gets posted here is from Fox "News" and other "News" sources. Evil Muslims are the flavor of the day.  I notice that on a regular basis Fox "News", a cable channel, runs dozens of ads hyping itself as the "most watched cable news channel", and sirs and CU4 dutifully  report this as how Fox "News" is the most popular News channel, even thought it is a cable channel and is far less popular than broadcast news channels. It also spends more time running ads, commentary and self-promotion than anything that could possibly be called news.

So if you want to post about Asians being mugged, you will have to do it yourself.

[Christians4LessGvt]

Yes XO...Asians, Sihk's,and Muslims are being treated so
badly in the US that's why so many keep pouring in!
Gosh it must be so bad for the Asians look at this CNN headline!

http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/28/us/pew-study-immigration-asians-hispanics/

Just like the standard bullshit Left talking point fantasy land agenda
that every cop is a racist and cops are killing lots of innocent blacks
and the much larger problem of "blacks murdering blacks" is to be
downplayed and "hush hush".

You live outside of reality.

[Xavier_Onassis]

You make up a bunch of crap and accuse me of believing it.

You want to see what is done about Blacks killing one another, watch this.
http://www.officialchiraqthemovie.com/

[kimba1]

Has Assaults on sihks in america been proven untrue??

[Xavier_Onassis]

There was an assault on a Sikh temple in Wisconsin in which six were killed.

http://articles.philly.com/2012-08-06/news/33066184_1_sikh-temple-gunman-temple-kitchen

It is likely that CU4 thought that this caused even more Sikhs in India to want to come to take their place.

[Plane]

Has Assaults on sihks in america been proven untrue??

    I have heard of a few.

   An attack like this requires an attacker who really does not know what he is looking at, unfortunately that sort of ignorance isn't rare enough.

  Just discussing it in public and on media small and large probably helps.

   But it is also counterproductive to lynch actual Muslims , the victim of such an act would more often than not be harmless or of goodwill.

      IN the two weeks after 9-11-01 tension was high and the president addressed this subject directly in public addresses, keeping the lid on mostly.
        I recall one fatal rage attack in that period and the victim was a Sikh, the perpetrator I remember less  about , but was obviously a bonehead.

[kimba1]

This is my focus. Not that its wrong here to attack muslims but that the attackers also harm the wrong people. I bring this up often with often little response. People do not wish to deal with this. Easy to ignore

[Plane]

The right people to attack are out of reach for most of us.

Even an air force A-10 pilot flying over Iraqi territory has to be careful because most of the people in the area are innocent.

Bombs really don't care , even the smartest of them, so decisions made in advance produce the rules of engagement in hope of reducing the burden of collateral damage on the innocent.

Thus even a trained warrior with heavy bombloads over the heads of the genuinely guilty come back frustrated sometimes.

Picking on randomly chosen Muslims in the US is more likely to harm the innocent to no purpose at all.  Finding a guilty one that way has the odds of a lotto ticket.

[Xavier_Onassis]

Sikhs are ever so much easier to identify as foreigners than Saudi fanatics wearing American street clothes: they look like swarthy Israelis at the worst.

Stupid rednecks would pick a Sikh over a disguised Saudi every time.

[Plane]

   Even worse, Chechens are the most fanatical of them all, and as Caucasian as anyone from the Caucuses.