Quite the Democratic hutzpah

[sirs]

It's bad enough the lectures we got about peacefully accepting the election outcome (unless of course your horse doesn't win, then its ok for riots & mass protesting), but apparently a NY Democrat congress critter, by the name of Murphy, believes that President-elect Trump should nominate Clinton for UN Secretary.

Seriously, that's what she is advocating.

Clinton operated an unauthorized and unsecure server while serving as secretary of state. She said it was approved by the State Department, she lied.  She said no classified information was sent through the server, which was also a lie.  She continued to email classified information after leaving the State Department.  She was the subject of an FBI investigation while running for president.  It was an unprecedented email system that ignored federal regulations concerning preserving communications of government officials, with an active effort to destroy said comunications, in the face of a Congresional subpoena.  And we want this person back in government?  I don't think so

[Christians4LessGvt]

go pound sand NY Democrat Critter!

[sirs]

I've figured it out......the hypocritical rage of the left, as presently exemplified in all these protesters, riots, and #notmypresident ilk.....

For decades, Democrats have largely been in the driver's seat of policy making, in this country.  We see it in the ever expanding role of Government and the welfare state.  Either a Democrat was in the WH, or they controlled one, if not both houses of congress.  And they had enough votes, when it mattered in Judicial decisions at the Supreme Court to enact wide sweeping actions, such as Abortion & Obamacare.  Not enough to really screw the country, but enough to get their foot in the door, at the judicial level

There was those 1st 2 years of Bush II, that provided a cleaning out of the Clinton stench, and did allow across the board tax relief, that stemmed the fiscal impact of 911, but with 911, and the subsequent drumbeat of how bad Bush was in conducting the war, Democrats regained control of Congress, and Democrat-lite policies ensued once again

With the election of Trump, the GOP control of both branches of Congress, and the pending picks that will solidify a hopefully conservative leaning Supreme Court, the left is having an absolute conniption (downright fear) of so many of those beloved policies being reversed, if not abolished.  Not just Obama's legacy of executive orders on immigration, environment, "treaties", and guns, but policies way back to Clinton.  That's why you already have the asinine claims of how racist his cabinet is supposed to be looking like, how Hitleresque his actions are.  That's why all the unconscious fear in the form of riots and ridiculous rhetoric

IMHO

[Plane]

There is a vigil being held on the popular vote advantage that Clinton has, over a million and a half so far.

I remember Trump being asked if he would respect the process.

Do you suppose there would be a petition of signatures for Trump were the situation reversed?

[sirs]

Of course not, since the Constitution clearly stipulates its achieving the necessary electoral votes to become President, currently that being 270.  The left would proclaim the people have spoken, thru the Constitution, and we should have a peaceful transition of power

While many Trump supporters would feel horrible, there'd be precious little rioting, if any.  And there'd be no movement in trying to overturn the Electoral vote.  There'd just be half a country, PO'd at the imminent disaster a Mrs Clinton would provide us, in her administration

And on a tangential note, notice how the left, and being enabled by the media, keeps trying to paint the present Trump cabinet as not just radical, but beyond the ideological fringe.  And yet the same media didn't bat an eye at all the hard core leftists that were placed in high level cabinet positions, under Obama