Author Topic: Chute  (Read 1060 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0

Stray Pooch

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
  • Pray tell me, sir, whose dog are you?
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Chute
« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2007, 03:59:00 AM »
Quote
Rate of descent is the speed at which jumpers fall to the ground.

Ya think?  This is dumbing down from dumb.

Quote
The ATPS canopy is not circular in shape, as the T-10 is. It is a highly modified cross-shaped canopy with an inflated diameter 14 percent greater than that of the T-10, with 28 percent more surface area. . .

The 14-percent weight increase earns jumpers a 25-percent reduction in rate of descent.

Swwweeeeeet.  A slower-moving, larger target!

Thank God it is against the laws of warfare to shoot a paratrooper in the air. 

Yeah, right.
Oh, for a muse of fire, that would ascend the brightest heaven of invention . . .

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Chute
« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2007, 01:56:23 PM »
I get the impression that the change is needed because our soldies are carrying a lot more weight than they used to.



1945
 users.skynet.be/jeeper/page96.html

http://www.sproe.com/u/uniform-paratrooper.html

http://hardscrabblefarm.com/

http://www.101airborneww2.com/uniforms.html

http://www.geocities.com/pentagon/quarters/2116/hptll.htm


I give up , I have been looking for a good picture of  modern Paratroopers kit , but I am out of time.

http://www.army.mil/-news/2007/01/25/1513-paratroopers-go-to-combat-with-more-than-equipment/

http://www.army.mil/