Author Topic: MySpace won't give names of sex offenders  (Read 2469 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

The_Professor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1735
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
MySpace won't give names of sex offenders
« on: May 16, 2007, 06:03:43 PM »
Do you agree/disagree with MySpace's stance?
MySpace won't give names of sex offenders
Online networking site says proper legal processes weren't followed
By Elizabeth Dunbar
The Associated Press
Updated: 3:55 p.m. ET May 16, 2007

RALEIGH, N.C. - Citing federal privacy law, MySpace.com said Tuesday it won’t comply with a request by attorneys general from eight states to hand over the names of registered sex offenders who use the social networking Web site.

MySpace’s chief security officer said the company regularly discloses information to law enforcement officials but the federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act says it can only do so when proper legal processes are followed.

“We’re truly disheartened that the AGs chose to send out a letter ... when there was an existing legal process that could have been followed,” the security officer, Hemanshu Nigam, said in an interview.

In a letter Monday, attorneys general from North Carolina, Connecticut, Georgia, Idaho, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Ohio and Pennsylvania asked MySpace to provide information about registered sex offenders using the site and where they live.

Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal on Tuesday blasted MySpace for refusing to share the information and said no subpoena is needed for MySpace to tell the attorneys general how many registered sex offenders use the site “or other information relating to possible parole violations.”

“I am deeply disappointed and troubled by this unreasonable and unfounded rejection of our request for critical information about convicted sex offenders whose profiles are on MySpace,” Blumenthal said. “By refusing this information, MySpace is precluding effective enforcement of parole and probation restrictions that safeguard society.”

Christian Genetski, an attorney who has represented MySpace, said the Electronic Communications Privacy Act requires subpoenas, court orders or search warrants, depending on the information sought.

“It’s a clearly defined law that most providers and prosecutors understand and work with on a daily basis,” Genetski said. “My understanding is (the attorneys general) want the private personal information, and that’s clearly the information the ECPA protects.”

North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper said “it’s sad that MySpace is going to protect the privacy of sex offenders over the safety of children.”

Nigam said MySpace is serious about identifying and removing sex offenders from its Web site and wants to work with the attorneys general.

“Everybody needs to get together and delete online predators,” Nigam said, adding that MySpace supports state and federal legislation requiring sex offenders to register e-mail addresses. “The attorneys general’s concerns and our concerns are exactly the same.”

In December, MySpace announced it was partnering with Sentinel Tech Holding Corp. to build a database with information on sex offenders in the United States.

Software to identify and remove sex offenders from the site has been used for 12 days, and MySpace has “removed every registered sex offender that we identified out of our more than 175 million profiles,” Nigam said.

It is also working with Sentinel to share the sex offender database and technology with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, which works directly with law enforcement officials, Nigam said.


MySpace, which is owned by News Corp., and other social networking sites allow users to create online profiles with photos, music and personal information, including hometowns and education. Users can send messages to one another and, in many cases, browse other profiles.

MySpace’s policy prevents children under 14 from setting up profiles, but it relies on users to specify their ages.

URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18699520/

***************************
"Liberalism is a philosophy of consolation for western civilization as it commits suicide."
                                 -- Jerry Pournelle, Ph.D

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: MySpace won't give names of sex offenders
« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2007, 08:22:57 PM »
How is myspace to know who is a registered sex offender and who isn't?


The_Professor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1735
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: MySpace won't give names of sex offenders
« Reply #2 on: May 16, 2007, 09:38:15 PM »
http://www.mapsexoffenders.com/  This map shows you any sex offenders in your area.

http://www.familywatchdog.us/  THE Registry
***************************
"Liberalism is a philosophy of consolation for western civilization as it commits suicide."
                                 -- Jerry Pournelle, Ph.D

Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: MySpace won't give names of sex offenders
« Reply #3 on: May 16, 2007, 09:51:36 PM »
http://www.mapsexoffenders.com/  This map shows you any sex offenders in your area.

http://www.familywatchdog.us/  THE Registry

Because we all know that sex offenders won't lie about their name or address when signing up for MySpace.

 ::)
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: MySpace won't give names of sex offenders
« Reply #4 on: May 16, 2007, 09:53:59 PM »
That still doesn't answer my question.

Attached is the myspace signup page.

domer

  • Guest
Re: MySpace won't give names of sex offenders
« Reply #5 on: May 16, 2007, 10:10:51 PM »
This seems to be a question of federal preemption. I hasten to add, according to my recollection, not every federal law has preemptive effect. Though a pain in the ass, a challenge along these lines in a given state court may go a long way to clearing this matter up. I don't know about everyone else, assuming MySpace generates a lot of business from its reputation as a "confidence protector," but there's at least a superficial question of profits coming before protection, even of kids.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: MySpace won't give names of sex offenders
« Reply #6 on: May 16, 2007, 10:19:42 PM »
I still don't see how myspace can be required to provide information it does not have.

fatman

  • Guest
Re: MySpace won't give names of sex offenders
« Reply #7 on: May 16, 2007, 10:29:51 PM »
I agree with MySpace on this one.  The attorney generals have a proper channel to go through to get the information they sought, and just because the info they seek is on sex offenders doesn't nullify that.

A side note on sex offenders:  my brother is one.  It was a case of him at age 20 having sex with a fifteen year old girl at a party, who according to several witnesses misrepresented her age.  When he was convicted of Rape of a Child 3rd (no statutory rape here in WA anymore folks) he received 30 days in county jail and 45 days of electronic home monitoring.  When he refused deviancy treatment (his thought was that he didn't have any sexual problems, at least not any that group therapy with a bunch of other sex offenders would solve), he was moved from a Level I sex offender to a Level II sex offender listing.  If he loses his home, well, that's a major risk factor to re-offend here in WA and his listing will go to Level III.  In Washington and several other states, we use levels to classify sex offenders as to their thought likelihood of reoffending-Level I- minor risk (name isn't in any public database) Level II- moderate risk (name and picture on internet) Level III-serious risk (name and picture on internet, television, newspapers).  There is something seriously wrong when a person like my brother who is generally a good person (I am not blind to my brother's flaws) and makes one mistake in his life, has to pay for it the rest of his life.

The fact is that a lot of sex offenders are not like Duncan or the guy that kidnapped those two boys in (I think) Missouri.  Contrary to popular misconception sex offender recidivism is not extremely high and is in fact surpassed by many other crimes.  The big movement now is to "redline" sex offenders until basically they have nowhere to live in that municipality/county/state.  There are an influx of sex offenders moving from Iowa into Wisconsin because of this.

The very real problem is how to integrate a sex offender back into society, I know a bit about this from helping my brother.  If an SO has no home, no work, no money, what do people think is going to happen?  The chances are very good that they will reoffend, some of these people need real help but the state sure as hell doesn't pay for it.  I'm not saying that everyone should be warm and cuddly with their neighborhood sex offender, and there are some that certainly deserve to wear the label.  Here in Washington we have a civil commitment board that when an SO is released from prison, they evaluate the SO and if he is deemed a high enough risk, he is civilly committed at McNeil Island, where most committees are rarely released back into society.

If the sex offender registry actually worked, I wouldn't have a problem with it, but I don't think that it does.  Most sex offenses are committed by first timers, though there are exceptions.  It creates a false sense of security for parents in that Old Joe may be creepy but he isn't an SO so that's okay (that isn't all parents obviously).  Lastly, I personally am more worried about released murderers and car thieves but there is no registry on them (as you can tell, I don't have children).  Should all former criminals be forced onto a public registry?

sex offender recidivism
http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:m0mVZ9L_YsoJ:www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/rsorp94.pdf+sex+offender+recidivism&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us


domer

  • Guest
Re: MySpace won't give names of sex offenders
« Reply #8 on: May 16, 2007, 11:45:26 PM »
Presumably the states requesting info have valid, certified convictions to present MySpace along with the applicable state statute. By doing business in that state, MySpace "consents" (it actually has no choice) to be subject to that state's laws. The question thus becomes a simple one of enforcement with the federal statute before mentioned lurking in the background and no doubt prompting a preemption analysis.

As to Fatman's brother, it's always a shame when a decent guy gets caught up beyond reason in a system that has far too few options for exoneration. In defense of the system, however, it's often better to have one that is flawed rather than none at all, on the theory that the greater good is served. Happily, in typical American style, the system is designed under our very foundational principles to be subject to scrutiny and correction, which, perhaps, Fatman can contribute to.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: MySpace won't give names of sex offenders
« Reply #9 on: May 16, 2007, 11:56:48 PM »
Quote
Presumably the states requesting info have valid, certified convictions to present MySpace along with the applicable state statute.

Again, how can myspace provide information it does not have?

imagine myspace is a big telephone switchboard and the states are asking it to data mine. Kind of like the nsa scandals of a year or so ago.


kimba1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8009
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: MySpace won't give names of sex offenders
« Reply #10 on: May 17, 2007, 02:26:06 AM »
it seems more like not protecting the privacy of the sex offendr but the privacy of people in general.
myspace is actively deleting every found one possible,but also there is absolutely no way for them to provide any accurate information on who is dangerous or not.
remember being on the sex offenders list does not whatsoever mean you are a threat to anyone.
the majority are very minor
I looked at one of those amber alert sites.
it has way way too people on my area for me to believed these are all predators.
at careful look pretty much most are minors charges that require for them to be on the list.
ex. prostition,flashing,etc.
the better safe than sorry method is still good to do
but parents are rarely responsible enough to say sorry if ever .

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: MySpace won't give names of sex offenders
« Reply #11 on: May 17, 2007, 07:30:41 AM »
MySpace Predator Caught by Code
Kevin Poulsen  10.16.06 | 2:00 AM
YAPHANK, New York -- The computer crimes unit of New York's Suffolk County Police Department sits in a gloomy government office canopied by water-stained ceiling tiles and stuffed with battered Dell desktops. A mix of file folders, notes, mug shots and printouts form a loose topsoil on the desks, which jostle shoulder-to-shoulder for space on the scuffed and dented floor.

I've been invited here to witness the endgame of a police investigation that grew from 1,000 lines of computer code I wrote and executed some five months earlier. The automated script searched MySpace's 100 million-plus profiles for registered sex offenders -- and soon found one that was back on the prowl for seriously underage boys.

 
Andrew Lubrano's mug shot.
That's something that MySpace has said it cannot do. Rather, it is seeking new laws that would make it easier to ban sex offenders from the site through an e-mail registry.

MySpace busts are rare in this unit. About half the work done by the eight detectives here is aimed at online predators, but the networking site poses challenges that open chat rooms -- a dying social scene among today's youth -- never did. "It's a dangerous place for kids," says Frank Giardina, a good-natured, 49-year-old detective with salt-and-pepper hair and a matching mustache. "It's also difficult for law enforcement."

That's because much of what happens on MySpace unfolds outside public view. The computer crime unit has erected bait profiles registered to fake underage teens, but so far the tactic has netted only one arrest. Proactively scouring MySpace pages is futile: The smarter sexual predators stick to private messages, and diligently prune their public comment boards of any posts from young friends that hint at what's happening behind the scenes.

Rate this story on reddit.Today's investigatory target, 39-year-old Andrew Lubrano, has been less careful, and now he faces his fourth arrest for a sex crime. Lubrano was sentenced to three years probation in 1987 for sexual abuse against a 7-year-old boy, according to police. In 1988, he got another probation term for second-degree sex abuse. In 1995, he earned a three-to-nine-year prison term for sexually abusing two boys he'd been babysitting, one 11, the other 9.

The parole board turned Lubrano down three times, and he was cut loose in September 2004 largely unsupervised, having served every day of his nine-year max. By November 2005 he was on MySpace, making friends.

In the beginning, Lubrano seemed to use the site innocently. But in April, he began adding teenagers to his friends list. One of the first was Jacob (not his real name), a gay 14-year-old high school student in Virginia, who reports his age as 16 in his profile. Lubrano starts calling him "sex toy" and asking him about his living situation. Lubrano thanks another Virginia boy for adding him to his friends list by writing, "Thanks for the ass, I mean add."

Giardina has been posing as another 14-year-old boy in online chats with Lubrano, and he says he's received less-nuanced communiqués from the offender discussing having oral sex with the fake teen. He shows me part of a chat log, Lubrano asking, "u into hair? Like hary (sic) men? Where do you have hair at?"

Lately, Lubrano's been talking about meeting at a campsite or a movie theater. Today the detective thinks his target is ready to firm up a tentative commitment to meet at a local bowling alley. A signed search warrant is burning a hole in Giardina's pocket.

 
Serial sex offender Andrew Lubrano's MySpace profile, in June, showed 93 friends, including six teenagers he met through the site.
But so far, Lubrano hasn't turned up online. The detective keeps one eye on his monitor as he talks, willing the appearance of the pop-up box that will announce that the predator has logged onto AIM for another chat. "He sent me an e-mail Saturday night, but nothing today," he sighs.

My road to this New York police unit began in Perl.

In May, I began an automated search of MySpace's membership rolls for 385,932 registered sex offenders in 46 states, mined from the Department of Justice's National Sex Offender Registry website -- a gateway to the state-run Megan's Law websites around the country. I searched on first and last names, limiting results to a five-mile radius of the offender's registered ZIP code.

Wired News will publish the code under an open-source license later this week.

The code swept in a vast number of false or unverifiable matches. Working part time for several months, I sifted the data and manually compared photographs, ages and other data, until enhanced privacy features MySpace launched in June began frustrating the analysis.

Excluding a handful of obvious fakes, I confirmed 744 sex offenders with MySpace profiles, after an examination of about a third of the data. Of those, 497 are registered for sex crimes against children. In this group, six of them are listed as repeat offenders, though Lubrano's previous convictions were not in the registry, so this number may be low. At least 243 of the 497 have convictions in 2000 or later.

Five of the sex offenders are listed as "absconded" -- one of those still logs in regularly. Others are listed as "in custody," and last logged into MySpace shortly before their arrest. Some are fresh out of custody. One North Carolina user went to prison in 1999 for rape and "indecent liberties with a minor." When he got out this year, he was on MySpace within two months -- though so far his only friend is MySpace's Tom.

 A 34-year-old former basketball coach uses MySpace to keep in touch with his one-time students; his sex offender registry entry says he had boys under 13 remove their clothes in front of him. A 33-year-old man who served 18 months for molesting a child under 13 in 1994 set his MySpace motto to "Love knows not age."

For every profile with warning signs, I found eight without. In many cases, the sex offender's MySpace profile is a window into a seemingly normal life: Their comment board is innocent; their image gallery contains a wedding photo or two; the underage friends on their list, if they have any, turn out to be relatives, or adults lying about their age to game MySpace's old security model -- in which only 14- and 15-year-olds enjoyed private profiles.

Lubrano stood out early in the results. His rap sheet was chilling, and by the time I found him, a half-a-dozen underage boys populated his friends list, many commenting on his message board. He lavishes particular attention on Jacob, the 14-year-old in Virginia, lamenting the distance from his home on Long Island to the house Jacob shares with his grandparents near Washington, D.C. -- about a six-hour drive. "Damn," he writes, "it's a shame you don't live close by boy the things we can do."

I sent Lubrano a message through his MySpace account, asking about his conduct, and reached out to seven teenagers with whom he'd been corresponding. When no one replied, I contacted the Suffolk County police, which has jurisdiction over Lubrano's home in Centereach, New York, and was responsible for busting him in 1995. The computer crime unit opened an investigation, and I agreed to hold this story until that investigation was complete.

In my first phone call with Giardina, he was amazed that Lubrano was so easy to find. "He registered on MySpace using his real name? What a nitwit."

Parry Aftab, an internet privacy lawyer, says she's not surprised. "A lot of the bad guys use their real name, as you've seen. It's amazing to me how many. Look at (former Rep. Mark) Foley, the idiot, happy to use his real name and communicate with people who know who he is."

Aftab is executive director of WiredSafety.org, an online safety nonprofit group that works closely with MySpace. She thinks the MySpace offender search results are a chance to drum home to kids that predators are out there -- a reality she says teenagers aren't easily accepting. The Wired News project also illustrates something MySpace could do to make its community safer, she says: hunting down and banning sex offenders from its site. "I don't think they thought about it. But I think that once we bring it to their attention they will. This is a threshold moment in internet safety."

 My search left me less convinced that targeting past offenders would be an effective way for MySpace to find current or future predators. By its nature, a search like mine is only going to produce people who use their real names and addresses, and who are perhaps the least likely of the offenders to be up to no good.

But Aftab believes MySpace's crush of young people eager to make friends, posting racy photos and sharing a slice of their daily lives is too strong a temptation to child predators; they simply don't belong on MySpace. Whether it is one, or a thousand, you should kick them off. "You can't take an alcoholic to a bar. You can't take a drug addict to a place where people are smoking grass or doing heroin," she says.

Last week, I told MySpace about my search, and about Lubrano. The company's chief security officer, Hemanshu Nigam, responded that MySpace would like to ban sex offenders from the site, but is waiting for new laws that would make it easier to do so. He said the company is lobbying Congress for legislation that would require sex offenders to register their e-mail addresses with a central database. "By having such a database, MySpace and other sites would be able to access it in order to block these individuals from ever registering on the site," Nigam said in a written statement.

The subject came up in a hearing before a House subcommittee in June. Michael Angus, executive general counsel of Fox Interactive Media, which owns MySpace, talked up the benefits of an e-mail registry at that time, suggesting that name-matching against public registries, the very technique I was at the same time applying in the Wired News investigation of MySpace, simply wouldn't work. "The numerous registries aren't readily available to us, he said at one point. He also argued that predators could easily use false names.

That position drew a skeptical line of questioning from Rep. Greg Walden (R-Oregon).

"If you're checking for the amount of skin in an image and that sort of thing, and however your logarithms work, you'd think you ought to check, you know, 'John Doe,' who happens to be a sex offender, and weed them out," Walden said at the time. "I believe some of these guys are stupid enough to use their real name. And if you weed out one?"

By Oct. 2, my simple script had brought me to the brink of just such an arrest.

Three hours into the stakeout, watching DrewWho26 fail to appear on AIM is getting tiring. The detectives suspect they've been stood up. It goes like that sometimes, says Giardina -- a perp will get cold feet ahead of the first planned meeting, the second. By the third time, blind hope usually overpowers the cool, rational voice telling the suspect he's being set up, and the day ends with handcuffs.

But with Lubrano, the detectives already have a search warrant. Giardina goes to a phone in a side room and calls Lubrano's house -- Lubrano delivers newspapers for a living, and sometimes sleeps in the afternoon, so a wrong number call might wake him. Someone answers after two rings, and Giardina hangs up. The voice didn't sound like Lubrano's though.

Two of the detectives head out to drive past Lubrano's house and look for his car.

I wander into the small office space. They have a rogue's gallery set up in the corner, three poster boards with 36 mug shots of sex offenders the computer crime unit has busted this year. It's an odd bunch. Some appear young and angry, most are middle-aged, despairing, sunken pale faces. "Some of these are sorry, sorry sacks," says Giardina.

The detectives perk up when I tell them how I found Lubrano. John Friberg, a slender, steel-haired man who looks like CNN's Anderson Cooper, has a degree in computer science, and he asks probing questions about the ins and outs of screen-scraping MySpace and the DOJ. He's game to try it himself. "Right now we've got the whole big pool of MySpace to try and narrow it down to the sex offenders," he says.

At 2:15 p.m., a detective in the field calls in. "He just got home? Great," Giardina says into the phone. They'll keep watching the house, in case Lubrano leaves again, while back in the office DrewWho26's grayed-out name in the AIM window is eyed with new intensity.

"Send him an e-mail," suggests Friberg. "'Hey, I see you just got home.'" Everyone laughs.

At 2:25, Lubrano comes on. Giardina leans back, hands off the keyboard, waiting for Lubrano to come to him. Instead, the man's out of AIM almost instantly.

Six minutes later, the phone rings again. Lubrano has just left in his car, and the detectives on the scene want to know what to do: Should they pull him over?

No. They'll just tail Lubrano while a patrol car is radioed to make a traffic stop. The remaining cops at the office -- three of them -- pile into an unmarked car and head out, while I follow in my rental.

By the time we get there, Lubrano's in the back of an unmarked cop car and the detectives are doing paperwork and inventorying the contents of his SUV. The cruiser lit up Lubrano on a busy street about a mile from his home, and he pulled into the parking lot of a small law practice next door to a motorcycle shop.


Suffolk County police detectives take computers out of Lubrano's home in Long Island shortly after his Oct. 2 arrest.Two of Lubrano's five children were with him, and they're standing sullenly at the rear of the car. The eldest is 18, with a shock of bristly red hair; he's on his cell phone. The other is 14, and has Down's syndrome. He idly kicks at some fallen leaves, then wanders around to the side of the car, where one of the detectives is still crouched, searching the glove box.

His older brother grabs the boy's arm gently to stop him. Protecting him.

Friberg and another detective head over to Lubrano's home -- a pleasant, ranch-style house on a quiet, shady street. Down the block, kids are tossing a football in their front yard, while the police haul Lubrano's computers out the front door and put them in their hatchback.

Later, the detectives tell me that Lubrano claimed in the car that he didn't go any further with his online friends than some dirty talk. If true, that's good news for the kids, and for Lubrano. Under a July state appellate court decision, merely soliciting a minor for sex online in New York is no longer a felony, unless the perpetrator sends explicit photos as part of the enticement.

Lubrano's is one of the first cases under the new decision, and the next day, the police and the county district attorney hold a press conference to announce that they'd caught a repeat sex offender, and could only charge him with attempting to endanger the welfare of a child, a misdemeanor.

Giardina is optimistic that the local media attention over the light charge will spur a change in the law. Lubrano is being held on bail of $25,000 cash or a $50,000 property bond. He could simply stay in jail and serve out the maximum sentence of 90 days.

In the final analysis, I still believe MySpace is good for kids. Jacob, the boy Lubrano most flagrantly courted, provides a clear example of the site's benefits, as well as its flaws. When the teen recently got in trouble with homophobic bullies at his high school, he came home to MySpace, and quickly garnered an outpouring of sympathy and advice from his friends. Any reaction to the incidents of MySpace predation that would rob Jacob and other children of the promise of such self-expression and support is suspect.

But it's clear that MySpace could do more. It should more diligently employ its technical resources to look for the signs of predation, perhaps automatically scanning the contents of private and public messages between adults and children for sexual content, backed up by a manual inspection. It's difficult to imagine any scenario in which a 39-year-old man should be calling a teenager "sex toy."

It's all up to MySpace. We can't count on parental supervision; how many teenagers looking for a space to hang out in with friends will accept one occupied by parents? We can't count on peer policing; nobody reported Lubrano for his inappropriate comments.

We definitely can't count on teenage street smarts. Swagger isn't judgment. Young Jacob is a smart guy, but even after he politely rebuked Lubrano for hitting on him, he made plans to meet the man at a Pennsylvania amusement park.

Lubrano didn't initiate the planned meeting; he'd already announced he would be there with his family when Jacob's school scheduled a field trip to the destination. Their plans fell through when Jacob's trip was canceled.

"Thank Gosh I didn't go," says Jacob.

I'm chatting with Jacob in AIM the day after Lubrano's arrest. I found his screen name in a friend's comment board, and caught him online after school. He calls Lubrano a "friend," but quickly renounces him when he learns that his friend is a child molester. He says he's shocked by the news; but then incongruously explains that he just thought Lubrano was a 39-year-old man who likes young boys.

"I do think its kinda weird for that age to flirt with me and stuff," he writes. "Like, kinda desperate and kinda leading me to think that something's wrong. But I didn't really do anything. I love being complimented. So, I thought it was nice of him to say that he thought I was cute or whatever."

MySpace is a big part of Jacob's life, and his greatest fear is that this story, or the ongoing police investigation, will get him banned from the internet, or he'll lose his MySpace profile. I urge him to be more careful about adding friends -- he has 3,800 of them -- and to make his profile private. He says he will, but so far his MySpace page remains wide open.

http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/10/71948?currentPage=all

Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: MySpace won't give names of sex offenders
« Reply #12 on: May 17, 2007, 08:09:54 AM »
The attorney generals have a proper channel ...

Sorry, pet peeve of mine. The plural of "attorney general" is "attorneys general."
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)

fatman

  • Guest
Re: MySpace won't give names of sex offenders
« Reply #13 on: May 17, 2007, 10:01:16 AM »
Sorry, pet peeve of mine. The plural of "attorney general" is "attorneys general."

Sorry ami, I wasn't sure on it.  Attorney Generals looked better to me than attorneys general's.

Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: MySpace won't give names of sex offenders
« Reply #14 on: May 17, 2007, 11:32:38 AM »
Sorry ami, I wasn't sure on it.  Attorney Generals looked better to me than attorneys general's.

Yeah, it should have read "The attorneys general have a proper channel to go through ..." Say that out loud, it sounds right.

"General" in this case is used as an adjective, so it should never be pluralized. What confuses people is that in English, adjectives are normally before the noun they're modifying, but it's after the noun in this case. Comes from having a variable sentence structure.
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)