Author Topic: The Battle of Newark  (Read 822 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

gipper

  • Guest
The Battle of Newark
« on: July 04, 2007, 09:33:17 PM »
The tragedy of race and neglected urbanization is stated boldly in Newark, New Jersey. It has one of the highest homicide rates in the nation, with gang violence spreading a net of razor-wire over hapless and helpless average folk trying to escape the often indiscriminate needs of drug trafficking and misguided machismo. This is the most notable feature for me, a criminal attorney who often practices in the courts of that city. But underneath this headline outrage, there is failure in just about every direction: an abominable, though now tended, public school system; exceedingly high dropout rates; unemployment exceeding twice the state average; and, in general terms, a malaise that had long ago set in that led far too many to give up on any dream whatsoever and to settle for a stasis of public aid and municipal corruption. The largest employer in Newark was until very recently the city itself.

Then the election came. Out went 20-year incumbent Sharpe James, whose tenure as mayor was preceded by 16 years on the city council. Reportedly, there was endemic corruption under his watch and the high municipal employment just mentioned, patronage that hurt the city and bled the city, serving only a stasis of people contentonly to get theirs.

The winner of last year's election was a man named Cory Booker, a young man in his mid-30's, a wunderkind some said, a race-traitor others said, based not only on his policies (such as cutting the employment rolls paid by city hall) but also his very attributes themselves. He was raised in a predominantly white ward of the city after his parents sued a realtor who would have excluded them. He has brought in a cadre of professional managers, a number of whom are white. And although his home and his vocation and his roots tie him to Newark in very profound ways right now, occasionally he hears himself called carpetbagger, for many believe he is headed for the statehouse and maybe Washington. And his sensibilities extend beyond "urban schtick" but legitimately so based on his degrees frrom Stanford, Yale and Oxford (as a Rhodes Scholar).

One of the first things Mayor Booker did was to declare war on gangs, an initiative with only spotty results so far. Then he cut the job rolls. Whereupon a recall campaign was launched, apparently by disgruntled workers who lost their sinecures. Apparently the battle is on.

For my sensibilities and values, Booker gets all the prayers from me he may need. To some extent at least, though most of us adapt at a level considerably lower than his mark of achievement, this is a struggle between a free-reining, "new" black man who can live comfortably in both worlds, having met the challenge our culture has presented him, and the those -- often through no fault of their own -- who take the refuge of the familiar, and try to perpetuate it, drawing a protective cocoon around so much dysfunctional behavior.

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Battle of Newark
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2007, 10:35:35 PM »
Soon as I heard "war on gangs" I turned off.  Gangs are a symptom, not a cause.  They're also an easy target, which means your man is after some cheap headlines with minimal effort.   I had the same reaction to "cutting the job rolls."  Just another way to cut welfare.  Gonna cause more problems than it solves, in the end.  Cost more money than it saves.

Books have been written about the problems of cities like Newark (where my aunt and uncle lived for a few years after the war and was once, from what I heard, quite a nice place to live) and all I know is that the problems are vast and multi-faceted.  Incredibly complex.   I personally believe that they could be solved, but only in a socialist state.  To fix Newark within the prevailing socio-economic and political framework would be, IMHO, impossible, but if a serious effort were to be made, it would require an exhaustive study of the problem and a master plan at the very minimum, neither of which seems to have been undertaken.

Sounds to me like Booker is just another Obama after some quick fixes and favourable ink on his way to somewhere else.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16143
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: The Battle of Newark
« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2007, 12:32:29 AM »
Be interesting to compare the stories of Newark and Oakland. Two cities overshadowed by their flashier neighbor.

I understand Jerry Brown did good work in Oakland while he was there. Perhaps Booker is cut from the same mold.


_JS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3500
  • Salaires legers. Chars lourds.
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Battle of Newark
« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2007, 02:25:17 PM »
Do prayers from an agnostic have any value? (I'm joking)

I agree with Michael about the cutting of city employees. Especially depending on how it is being done. I could certainly see why someone with twenty or twenty-five years with the city would be pissed that some young folks from Yale or Oxford have decided that they don't want to pay full pensions, etc. If that is the case (and I don't know that it is) then there is nothing "new" or "creative" about it. The military has done that for years as have many companies.

On the other hand they could be cutting vacant positions, which under government accounting rules still require budgeting. That isn't such a bad thing and can often lead to efficiency (though sometimes it can lead to extra responsibilities for the lowest paid employees, which leads to high turnover rates).

I disagree with Michael on fighting gang violence. There is nothing more sad than seeing good, hard-working folks who are too paralyzed with fear to enjoy their own neighborhoods. I've never been to Newark, but I have been to Camden late at night and it was a sad state of affairs (this was in the late 80's...I wonder if it is better now?). We have gangs in Nashville too. I don't disagree that they are a symptom, but they have no right to paralyze entire neighborhoods with murder, prostitution, intimidation, drug dealing, etc. How are you supposed to raise your kids in that environment?
I smell something burning, hope it's just my brains.
They're only dropping peppermints and daisy-chains
   So stuff my nose with garlic
   Coat my eyes with butter
   Fill my ears with silver
   Stick my legs in plaster
   Tell me lies about Vietnam.

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Battle of Newark
« Reply #4 on: July 05, 2007, 02:58:50 PM »
Well, I'm certainly in favour of normal policing action against gangs, anti-gang squads, etc. as any big city will do.  What I meant was that this guy seemed to be grabbing easy headlines if his first actions are "to go after gangs" as some kind of solution to the urban rot.  It wasn't a good sign that this was the new mayor's first and majorly hyped up action.

Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Battle of Newark
« Reply #5 on: July 10, 2007, 05:17:08 PM »
Thank God I got out of there years ago...
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)