<<When was rape considered a "bad choice"?? >>
I'll type real slow so that you can understand this.
Rape is not a choice. A woman who has been raped has not made any choice. Not a good choice, nor a bad choice. The fetus was FORCED upon her.
So, sirs is willing to allow her the privilege of abortion. She did not get into her predicament through bad choices, so she gets the right to kill the fetus.
A girl who has unprotected sex made a bad choice, according to you. Right? So, not being raped, she does not get the right to kill the fetus. She is forced to keep the fetus to full term and deliver it.
In effect, sirs really sees the granting or withholding of abortion rights as dependent on the conduct of the mother. A blameless mother (e.g., a rape victim) can kill the fetus if she wants to. A blameworthy mother (e.g., one who chose to have unprotected sex) can not. She has to live with the consequences of her bad choices.
Well, the problem with that kind of thinking, of course, is that it is totally destructive of the key idea of the fetus as a fully human life form. If a fetus really is a human being in every sense of the word, then NOBODY has the right to kill it for any reason, neither the blameless mother, much less the blameworthy mother, the maker of "bad choices."
Once you assign to some people (blameless mothers) the right to kill the fetus, then you have automatically signed on to the idea that the fetus is something less than a full human being, that killing a fetus can not be murder. Because nobody on this earth has the right to take innocent human life, no matter how much easier things might thereby become for the killer's mind and/or body.