The 2nd Amendment Lives! Shot Heard Round The World. FREEDOM WINS.

[Michael Tee]

<<So Mikey is genetically superior to the Negro. >>

When did the "knuckle-dragging southern racist" morph into "the Negro?"

Just askin.

[BT]

Quote
He got there by betraying people just like himself to a bunch of white racist ass-holes.

Who did he betray?

Who decides what is appropriate Negro thought?

<<Who did he betray?>>

Every black kid who stands in need of affirmative action to rectify the surviving legacy of past and present racial discrimination.

<<Who decides what is appropriate Negro thought?>>

Me.  I do.

Quote
Me.  I do.

What makes you any different than a knuckle dragging southern racist? Geography?

<<What makes you any different than a knuckle dragging southern racist? >>
Luck.  Circumstances.

<<Geography?>>

That's part of it, but it's not all of it.

Frankly i don't see a difference.

unless you delude yourself into thinking your intentions are more pure.

<<Frankly i don't see a difference.>>

Let me spell it out for you, at the risk of seeming somewhat immodest:  I'm smarter, I'm better educated, I come from a better family, I come from a better culture, I live in a better country and I've probably got better genes.  That's why he's a southern racist knuckle-dragger and I'm not.

<<unless you delude yourself into thinking your intentions are more pure. >>

That's no delusion, that's a fact.
***********************************************************************

The southern racist thinks they know what is appropriate Negro thought just like you do.

They think that because they consider themselves genetically superior. Genetic superiority is a notion to which you subscribe.


So what is the difference again?

[Michael Tee]

So what is the difference again?

<<The southern racist thinks they know what is appropriate Negro thought just like you do.>>

They chose the mode of "Negro" thought that benefits themselves at the expense of the "Negro."  I choose the mode of "Negro" thought that benefits all of us, black and white.  They are self-interested rationalizing schmucks as well as morons.  I think of the interests of the entire human race, plus I'm a non-moron.  The difference is that I am right and they are wrong.

<<They think that because they consider themselves genetically superior.>>

So what?  They are wrong.  The whole concept of genetic superiority is bullshit.  These guys are bullshit artists extraordinaire, some of them so much so that they probably even believe their own bullshit, but that won't make it right.

[BT]

I choose the mode of "Negro" thought that benefits all of us, black and white.

How does uniform standardized Negro thought benefit us all?

[Xavier_Onassis]

Q. How does uniform standardized Negro thought benefit us all?
===============

A. It provides a balance between uniform standardized honky thought.

===================
In my opinion, this argument has come off the tracks.

[Michael Tee]

<<How does uniform standardized Negro thought benefit us all?>>

Since I never claimed that it did, and am reasonably certain it doesn't, I await your next question.  Hopefully it will deal with a position that I have taken as opposed to your grotesquely contorted, virtually unrecognizable versions of what you claim I have been saying.

[BT]

Since I never claimed that it did, and am reasonably certain it doesn't, I await your next question.  Hopefully it will deal with a position that I have taken as opposed to your grotesquely contorted, virtually unrecognizable versions of what you claim I have been saying.

When i asked who determines appropriate Negro thought you claim you did.

Do you deny saying that?

[BT]

Q. How does uniform standardized Negro thought benefit us all?
===============

A. It provides a balance between uniform standardized honky thought.

Is there such a thing?

And who determines what is appropriate uniform standardized honky thought.

Mikey might be too busy regulating appropriate Negro thought so we will probably need another watchdog to step up.

[Michael Tee]

<<Do you deny saying that?>>

Of course not, but it doesn't necessarily follow from that remark that I would approve of only one standardized thought per issue for "Negroes."    That's ludicrous.  I can't begin to imagine what twisted logic would have led you to such a conclusion.  I could foresee various respectable ways for blacks to approach any issue, but of course when a particular approach is obvious Tommin', I certainly intend to criticize it as such.  As would any other logical, fair-minded individual.  Just because a thought comes from a black person does not render it immune to any and all criticism from whites.  Including the criticism that it's just plain Tommin.

[BT]

I could foresee various respectable ways for blacks to approach any issue, but of course when a particular approach is obvious Tommin', I certainly intend to criticize it as such.

What exactly is wrong with Tommin'?

Isn't that the same as "when in Rome...."

[Michael Tee]

<<What exactly is wrong with Tommin'?>>

Nothing.  What exactly was wrong with Judas, for 30 pieces of silver, tipping off the Romans as to which guy was the one they wanted?

"When in [or occupied by] Rome . . . !"

[Michael Tee]

Tommin' just in case anyone didn't "get" my last post, is nothing more or less than betrayal.  One member of an oppressed group selling out to the oppressors to advance his personal fortune at the expense of all the other members of the group.  Most people would find that despicable.  They would not need to be told why.  Some will inevitably ask, What's wrong with that anyway?  I'm afraid if you have to ask, you'll never understand.  From the point of view of the snitch and the traitor, nothing IS wrong with it.  There are basically two kinds of people in the world, one in whom self-interest trumps all other values and one in whom it does not.

[BT]

One member of an oppressed group selling out to the oppressors to advance his personal fortune at the expense of all the other members of the group.

What expense to all the other members?

Be specific. What was the cost of Thomas's assimilation?

[Xavier_Onassis]

Thomas saw a need for a Supertoken and he took it. He is not respected by most Black people. But he does have one of the cushiest jobs in the USA.

[Michael Tee]

<<What expense to all the other members?

<<Be specific. What was the cost of Thomas's assimilation?>>

Wrong question.  You're assuming that a sell-out is only reprehensible if it accomplishes or helps to accomplish some nefarious end.

Thomas sold out to forces opposed to affirmative action.  That his white racist benefactors were not able, even with his sold-out assistance to roll back affirmative action doesn't make his sellout any more palatable.

You might as well argue that although William Joyce ("Lord Haw-Haw") sold out to the Nazis, they lost the war anyway and no British troops were seduced by his Nazi BS, so what does it matter anyway?  Thomas' act itself was noxious, the inability of white racists to profit from it does not make it any less reprehensible.