<<Speculative?
<<It worked in Japan , but only after quite a bit of it . . . >>
I respectfully beg to differ. Conventional bombing did not destroy Japanese fighting spirit or the Japanese military. They only surrendered when faced with the "new weapon" which threatened the devastation of all life on their islands.
<<what did the Jappaneese ever do or plan that was going to be worse than the worst famine in all of human history ?>>
I dunno how many times they could repeat the Rape of Nanking, how many more prisoners they could torture to death or how many they were going to use for biological warfare experiments. What is your point? Are you trying to argue that they didn't deserve everything they got?
<<No two famines of any other occasion amount to half of the 59-63 Chiuneese famine, The Chiuneese are "adapting " Communism into something that can produce enough food for the people who are produceing food to actually eat some , the more they adapt communism and adjust it and make it effective the less it looks like something Marx could claim to have thought of>>
plane, I am just not going to argue Chinese famines with you for the simple reason I don't know much about them. I have good reason to be extremely skeptical of all anti-communist propaganda, most of it originates from two sources, one being Nazis and Nazi collaborators and apologists and the other being very wealthy and powerful individuals (plutocrats) with a lot to lose if communism ever takes over their homelands, including America. Even if the famine occurred, I'm sure the actual death toll was much less than reported by fascist and crypto-fascist publications and it would have to have been unintentional and due to flawed plans and/or flawed executions of plans.