I have noticed that when the American car companies advertise that they are as reliable as Toyotas, Hondas, Mazdas, Nissans and Hyundais, they invariably quote J.D. Powers. However, when you look at Consumers Reports annual surveys, the
Japanese cars are nearly ALWAYS more reliable.
CU rates the '05 Ford 500 AWD as average (bad notes on the audio system) and th '06 as somewhat better than average.
The Camry ranks much better than average and somewhat better respectively, so the 500 and the Camry are tied for 2006. Since the Ford was probably cheaper than the Camry and has 4WD, it was probably a better value.
I can't see calling a car a "lemon" because of one repair, especially if it cost nothing to repair. Apparently, many Land Rovers are lemons. A mechanic friend says they have six in his shop, awaiting new engines. There is a problem with the cylinder sleeves, and parts are slow in arriving. THAT's a lemon.
J.D. Powers rates consumer satisfaction during the first year of ownership , while CU takes a longer look, up to 7 years.
All cars, Fords included, are much more reliable than they used to be. Fords used to be famous for combining with the atmosphere at a most alarming rate. Mavericks and Gran Torinos were especially faulty. The newer cars are designed by computers, and they seem to have designed out those pockets (trunk lips, rocker panels, bottoms of doors, etc. where dirt and damp accuulate and cause rust. I think they use better rust treatment as well. y 1977 Celica was running great after 14 years and 190K, but it rusted out above the accelerator pedal: whenever it rained, water gushed down on my feet.