<<What is so heinous about including the fact that the GOP was instrumental in passage of the Civil Rights bills of the 60's? Why hide the truth?>>
BT, you can cherry-pick all you like, but in two and a half months, the Republican-dominated board, split strictly on party lines, has made almost one amendment per page to the curriculum standards.
<<Since January, Republicans on the board have passed more than 100 amendments to the 120-page curriculum standards affecting history, sociology and economics courses from elementary to high school. The standards were proposed by a panel of teachers.>>
I did not argue that every amendment made was "heinous," but obviously there has been some fairly ham-handed editing at work here, all from the GOP perspective. The Civil Rights Act was passed through the strenuous efforts of many Democratic leaders. Yes there was Republican support without which the bill would never have passed, but the initiative and the heavy lifting were primarily Democratic. When the hockey results are broadcast, usually the fans want to hear the final score and who scored the winning goal; the hard-core hockey nuts want to hear more than the essential details, they may want the names of all who scored, all the assists, all the saves and the number of shots on goal, but most newscasts skip the minute details and go for the essentials. High school history isn't taught in minute detail, it's an outline, but the GOP is determined to force itself into every page, no matter how minor the contribution.
And a lot of the changes seem to be more problematic than pointing out the GOP role in the Civil Rights Act. For example, they edited Thomas Jefferson out of the list of thinkers who influenced the American Revolution because they didn't like his thoughts on separation of church and state. That IS brainwashing and it's sinister as well. If you don't think so, you're just hiding your head in the sand.