<<Were these shouts said useing sound waves?>>
All shouts are transmitted by sound waves.
<<If they were then these microphones would have the best tool on earth for recording them .>>
Obviously they weren't the best tool on earth, because they didn't record them. Yet five people heard them. Also, the entire crowd was yelling and shouting. It was bedlam. Yet, unless you believe that all of them were shouting gibberish, you have to assume that some of them were shouting actual English words. If you assume that some of what was shouted was in words in English, then you have to note from the recording that you yourself heard that NOT ONE SINGLE WORD WAS CAPTURED, which pretty much puts the kibosh on your "best tool on earth."
Get over it, plane, in the midst of a shouting mob with probably hundreds of words being shouted, the "best tool on earth" didn't pick up a single one of them.
<<You cannot decide whether the croud can or cannot be heard distinctly saying any words.>>
I don't have to decide a God-damn thing - - FIVE PEOPLE, the Congressman and four others near him, heard the N-word many times.
<<But you have complete confidence that a man can hear better than a microphone in the same location.>>
Obviously yes. The microphone didn't pick up one distinguishable word from all that noise. Obviously the Congressman would have heard anyone shouting in the crowd in his vicinity, and what he heard, his companions all heard too. Yet none of the mikes picked up any of it, or any other word. It's too obvious for words.
<<The ONLY word ,that is distinct, is this one?>>
Of course not.
<<That might be possible if they were said at a low level by someone closer to the congressman than to the microphone , 15 times .>>
Ridiculous. Who the hell would speak in a low level to the Congressman in that din?
<<If shouted over a microphone at the congressman so that the congressman could hear it, the microphone could also have recorded it.
<<......fifteen times.>>
plane, THOUSANDS of words were probably shouted while the cameras were rolling and the cameras didn't pick up even one of them. Why in God's name do you think they could pick up "Nigger!" when they couldn't pick up one out of thousands??? You're just talking crazy.
<<Look at the videos availible, there were mikes in every direction>>
That's bullshit too, there were a limited number of mikes and no matter which way they pointed, NONE of them picked up a single word. Was every one of them pointed to a spot that was totally devoid of human presence? Wherever they pointed, there was probably somebody shouting something, but not one single word was picked up. Are you saying that no mike was pointed towards any person in the crowd, or that whoever it was pointed at remained silent for as long as it was pointing at him?
<<there is no where that an opprobrious shouter could have beenisolated from the mikes but also proximate to the congressmen.>>
plane, your theory is just plain crazy. There were plenty of people in the crowd, and as far as I could see, not one of them was speaking directly into a mike. It did not happen.
<<I do not accept that the chatter of the croud was unintelligable and intelligable both at the same time , this is an impossibility whether it is simple or not.>>
You still don't get that a mike is not a human ear? That a mike can't pick up everything that a human ear can pick up? That's YOUR problem, nobody else's. Why do you think videotapes of criminal activities, phone calls, ABSCAM bribes, etc., all come with subtitles, how the hell do you think the people in the videotapes understand one another's phone conversations, do they have to read the subtitles too? The more you try to deny the obvious, the crazier your theories and scenarios become.
<<I think that people eager to beleive a lie will indeed beleive it >>
Well, you certainly are an excellent demonstration of THAT. If you want to believe that Congressman Lewis imagined being called nigger or made it all up, you have certainly exhausted all rational and irrational hypotheses to wriggle out of a painfully obvious conclusion. I've never seen anyone fight harder against an obvious truth than you.