Author Topic: Follow the Money  (Read 2128 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Follow the Money
« on: August 20, 2011, 02:11:39 AM »

FOLLOW THE MONEY:

Where Are All the Islamic Terrorists? (Charles Kurzman, 7/31/11, The Chronicle Review)

In the fields of Middle East and Islamic studies, bad news is good for business. The more that non-Muslims fear Islam, the more security threats are hyped, the more attention my colleagues and I get. Journalists want insights from "Islam experts" and "Middle East specialists," regardless of how remote our area of research is from the day's news. Universities are hiring--there were more than 40 tenure-track jobs last year in Middle East and Islamic studies. Federal research grants are plentiful, especially from the military and the Department of Homeland Security.

It all points to an inescapable conclusion: Martin Kramer was right. A decade ago, just after 9/11, he accused scholars of profiting from the Islamist violence that their political correctness prevented them from taking seriously: "How many resources within the university could they command if their phones stopped ringing and their deans did not see and hear them quoted in the national newspapers and on public radio? And how would enrollments hold up if Muslim movements failed to hit the headlines?"

Scholars are not the only ones to benefit from these headlines. Kramer, a former professor who now holds positions at two think tanks, the Shalem Center in Jerusalem and the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, benefits, too. Just like university deans, think-tank administrators and donors allocate resources based in part on presence in the news media. Kramer exemplifies this arrangement. Every time he sounds an alarm about Islamic radicalism, he helps raise public vigilance, and increase financial support for his institutions.

By contrast, I am in the awkward position of undermining the importance of my own field. My research finds that Islamic terrorism has not posed as large a threat as reporters and the public think--certainly not as large a threat as Al Qaeda and its affiliates intended. They routinely complain about the failure of Muslims to join their movement.

Of the 56 million people who die each year around the world, around two million die from HIV/AIDS. Nearly one million die from malaria. Almost three quarters of a million die from violence. According to the National Counterterrorism Center, terrorism peaked in 2007 with 23,000 fatalities, half of them in Iraq--a terrible toll, but not a leading cause of death.

In the United States, 15,000 people are murdered each year. Islamic terrorism, including the Beltway sniper attacks, has accounted for almost three dozen deaths in America since 9/11--a small fraction of the violence that the country experiences every year.


Islamophobia is a lucrative gig for the scaremongers.
http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2011/08/follow_the_money_10.html

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Follow the Money
« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2011, 10:57:15 AM »
The threat of Islamic terrorism in the US is only slightly greater than the threat of being bitten by rabid foxes, bunnies, raccoons and opossums.

"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Follow the Money
« Reply #2 on: August 20, 2011, 01:18:40 PM »
Good, let's dismantle Homeland Security and especially the TSA.


Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Follow the Money
« Reply #3 on: August 20, 2011, 01:53:21 PM »
I am not sure about this. I have not heard how many terrorist acts have been stopped by HSA and TSA.
I am pretty sure that we do NOT need to spend more than we already are on such things.

We certainly should analyze their effectiveness on a regular basis.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Kramer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5762
  • Repeal ObamaCare
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Follow the Money
« Reply #4 on: August 20, 2011, 01:54:05 PM »
The threat of Islamic terrorism in the US is only slightly greater than the threat of being bitten by rabid foxes, bunnies, raccoons and opossums.

then why did you vote for a dimwit like obama?

hnumpah

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
  • You have another think coming. Use it.
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Follow the Money
« Reply #5 on: August 20, 2011, 04:19:52 PM »
Good, let's dismantle Homeland Security and especially the TSA.

Whoa, now, after 9/11 the 'Merican sheeple were begging for the gummint to provide better security, and many were willing to give up big chunks of their rights to allow the gummint to do so. Let's not undermine the will of the 'Merican sheeple so fast there.
"I love WikiLeaks." - Donald Trump, October 2016

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Follow the Money
« Reply #6 on: August 20, 2011, 04:40:33 PM »
Obama was not primarily responsible for HSA and TSA. It is pretty certain that both would be the same has McCain/Palin been elected.
If we have been safe from terrorists since 9-11, it is logically possible that (1) TSA is working properly, or that (2) TSA was not necessary in the first place. The way to determine which is true is to analyze the acts of terrorism that have been prevented, and modify TSA and Homeland Security accordingly.

Mcain seemed to be incompetent to be president and very ancient, and Palin was totally unqualified. I disagreed with their political viewpoints and I still do. Eisenhower was our last decent Republican president, and one of a very few.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Follow the Money
« Reply #7 on: August 20, 2011, 06:01:29 PM »
Good, let's dismantle Homeland Security and especially the TSA.

Whoa, now, after 9/11 the 'Merican sheeple were begging for the gummint to provide better security, and many were willing to give up big chunks of their rights to allow the gummint to do so. Let's not undermine the will of the 'Merican sheeple so fast there.

I have consistently been against Homeland Security. I have always thought it overkill.


BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Follow the Money
« Reply #8 on: August 20, 2011, 06:02:31 PM »
Obama was not primarily responsible for HSA and TSA. It is pretty certain that both would be the same has McCain/Palin been elected.
If we have been safe from terrorists since 9-11, it is logically possible that (1) TSA is working properly, or that (2) TSA was not necessary in the first place. The way to determine which is true is to analyze the acts of terrorism that have been prevented, and modify TSA and Homeland Security accordingly.

Mcain seemed to be incompetent to be president and very ancient, and Palin was totally unqualified. I disagreed with their political viewpoints and I still do. Eisenhower was our last decent Republican president, and one of a very few.

Never said Obama was responsible for HS.

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Follow the Money
« Reply #9 on: August 20, 2011, 06:08:58 PM »
You did not say this, Kramer said that Homeland security was all the fault of my voting for "dimwit Obama".

I thought you would have noticed this.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Follow the Money
« Reply #10 on: August 20, 2011, 07:58:46 PM »
  How does one measure the situation that doesn't exist?

If there were much less reaction to 9-11 what would be diffrent?

If Al Queda were being harrassed less might they be more successfull?


I don't know either , but I remember the WTC being attacked in the early 90s and the reaction being on a much smaller scale , Al Queda was hardly hurt and grew untill it could have a better chance.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Follow the Money
« Reply #11 on: August 20, 2011, 08:03:23 PM »
Boots in afghanistan w/ drones is different than rent a cops harrassing US citizens at airports. Let us not conflate responses.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Follow the Money
« Reply #12 on: August 20, 2011, 08:04:58 PM »
Are these not natureally conflated?

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Follow the Money
« Reply #13 on: August 20, 2011, 08:10:21 PM »
Only in the sense that they both are examples of misquided allocations of personnel. Afghanistan should have had more, the TSA much less.

hnumpah

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
  • You have another think coming. Use it.
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Follow the Money
« Reply #14 on: August 21, 2011, 03:49:30 AM »
Afghanistan could have had more, sooner, and possibly settled the issue once and for all, had some not gotten sidetracked into Iraq.
"I love WikiLeaks." - Donald Trump, October 2016