You wouldn't because you can't. You've pulled that lame ass excuse countless times..."I'd refute it, but no one would pay attention", or no one would care, or a waste of time, or whatever. How convenient in this, a debate forum, where you're apparently above the need to debate your position, or debunk someone else's. And how unfortunate the idea that a visitor might be passing thru, taking a view into this, a debate forum, and being a left leaning moderate, potentially poised to more actively support liberal causes, but witnesses your repetitive transparent inability to support that side of the argument or debunk something posted by the likes of me. Just your say so
You see, the difference between you & I, in this, a debate forum, outside of an exponential higher level of objectivity from my standpoint, is that when you're wrong, its pointed out how, where, and why. You back up nothing, but simply more because you said so. This debate forum isn't just me. You could pretend you're trying to debate Plane, who is far superior to me in objectivity and tolerance. But that would require effort....and you're more likely to be demonstrated how erroneous your position is by a far more objective bystander in him....which I guess is why you have to try and use me as your go-to demonstration of how utterly void your positions find themselves. The problem is, it doesn't change the fact, how all you've got going in trying to refute what O'Reilly concluded is your insults & intellectual laziness. Pity
