Here's why the Republicans are going to lose the Presidential election

[Xavier_Onassis]

There are many, many bigots, simpletons, kluxers and fools who need to be drummed out to vote, and without a sh!tload of money they will stay home.

The Democrats have an easy job in getting out the vote: Trump has insulted Latinos, Mexicans, veterans, Blacks, Asians, and women.

Trump has proven that he cannot run the country, He cannot even run his own fershluganer  campaign.

[sirs]

And if you were paying any attention, you would have noted that Clinton had squat "get out the vote" momentum, while Trump was breaking records for how many voted for him, during the primaries. 

So, your best hope is that there isn't some wave of get out the vote folk, and more people simply don't vote

[Xavier_Onassis]

If you have 18 candidates, there will be more people voting than if you have 2 or 3.
\
Hillary got many more primary votes than Trump.

Trump gonna lose if you don't send him money.

For every dollar you want his campaign to have, send at least $1.25, since The Donald is a businessman running his campaign as a profit-making venture. He is making a profit off his campaign. It is even LEGAL for him to do this.

[sirs]

You really are obsessed about the money, aren't you.  It's hysterical, when you were coming unglued about the money that Romney had, and the Koch's monies, now all of a sudden, Clinton's trough is no big deal, but Trump's lack of money is??  Priceless, the double standard

And news flash, Trump got more Republican votes, during the primary process, than any other in history

Trump will lose, if he doesn't have more electoral votes, come Nov.  Simple as that

[Plane]

If you have 18 candidates, there will be more people voting than if you have 2 or 3.
\
Hillary got many more primary votes than Trump.

Trump gonna lose if you don't send him money.

For every dollar you want his campaign to have, send at least $1.25, since The Donald is a businessman running his campaign as a profit-making venture. He is making a profit off his campaign. It is even LEGAL for him to do this.

   Are you under the impression that this is something Hillary Clinton has not done?

[Xavier_Onassis]

And news flash, Trump got more Republican votes, during the primary process, than any other in history
\
MORE REPUBLICAN VOTES That's sorta like winning the Special Olympics, isn't it?

Better send money, or Trump, he gonna lose.

[sirs]

Naaa, just needs more votes.  Kinda nice to know he hasn't been bought off like the Democratic candidate

[Xavier_Onassis]

He does not need to be bought off by evil moneygrubbing capitalists. He IS an evil, moneygrubbing capitalist.

But now he needs your money.

[sirs]

Naaaa......just needs my vote

[Plane]

XO has a valid point .

Hillary right now has enough money in the election warchest to swamp the electorate with slick advertising.

The cash available to Trump is much less.

I don't think that Hillary has carefully considered how this wealth is going to affect her lifestyle.

Most of the billion or two she can spend is hers to keep if she doesn't spend it.

But the dollar might become worthless if we elect a worthless president .

[Xavier_Onassis]

Most of the billion or two she can spend is hers to keep if she doesn't spend it.
=======================================
NOT TRUE!

Politicians are never allowed to spend campaign donations on themselves. That is illegal.

Hillary would NOT be a "worthless president". She would prevent a rerun of another Fascist judge like Scalia. She would deal better with healthcare and other entitlements. Trump is psychologically unfit to lead a country, He deliberately makes enemies for no good reason and  wastes a lot of time defending idiotic statements that he has made.

He is a bully, a demnagogue and an ignoramus.

And he is fresh out of money. Looks liker he is going to have to dip into his fortune to buy the presidency. Who would give a fatcat like him money when his entire position is :"I am so rich, I have no need to steal".
Let the sumbitch pay his own way or STFU.

[sirs]

Ummmm.......yes true

[Plane]

Most of the billion or two she can spend is hers to keep if she doesn't spend it.
=======================================
NOT TRUE!

You sure?

Politicians are never allowed to spend campaign donations on themselves. That is illegal.

http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2010/03/the-retirement-announcement-la/

http://elections.uscommonsense.org/

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/02/leftover-campaign-funds/


Ok as usual there is a complicated answer.

Since 1989 converting campaign funds to personal use has been illegal.

Funds collected in Political Action Committees can be converted to personal use. 

[Xavier_Onassis]

Funds collected in Political Action Committees can be converted to personal use.

Where does it say this is permitted? When has it been done?

It is certainly not how the Clintons got their money.

There would be no PACS if not for the rightwingers on the Court and in Congress.

[Plane]

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/fundraising/227011-fec-to-congress-ban-personal-use-of-political-committee-funds

"The Federal Election Commission (FEC) renewed its charge to Congress Thursday to extend a ban prohibiting personal use of campaign funds to all political committees."