I thought he was called "Mahatma" (great soul) in a sort of high admiration.
In his Autobiography he confessesto several serious (in his estimtion ) sins , I don't think he wanted to be worshiped , I like that about him too.
=====================================================
This is true. Gandhi was greatly admired, but he wasn't worshipped.
It is not clear that Jesus or Buddha or the Dalai Lama have ever expected to be worshipped, either.
Sun Myung Moon and Elijah Muhammad certainly didn't object to being deified, however. I think they rather liked the idea.
My point is that in ancient times, people were not expected to write autobiographies.
Jesus never wrote a word that we know of. He came from a tradition in which the Holy Word was a written word, and he purported to be a holy man. But regardless of this, he didn't write diddly-squat.
What was written about him, (by Matthew and John, who we think were disciples, and Luke and Mark, who had Roman names and about whom nothing is really known) is brief and the several tales contradict one another.
Within several decades of Jesus' crucifixion, a political leader of the Jews DID appear, and DID drive out the Romans. But then the Romans really got pissed and came back and drove most of the Jews out of Palestine or killed them.Not one word of this appears in the New Testament, even though it happened between the time of the death of Jesus and the time in which most of the New Testament was written.
One of history's major omissions, really. As an accurate history of the Jews and their doings, the Bible sucks.
There should have been a Book of Jesus. Being perfect and all, (assuming that any member of a Holy Trinity born without sin would be perfect), he could have gotten it right.
What we know about Gandhi and his life is vastly more than we shall ever know about Jesus.