YEs, Professor...as it should concern you greatly.
Look at history.
Why is it that a man has had more successes than a woman?
It boils down to how the young child was encouraged and taught by family members, especially the father.
Keep up your interaction in that positive and encouraging manner with your daughter, and you have tackled part of the battle.
I posted earler about Hillary and her emotional moment, stating that she struck a chord which resonated with almost all women.
I watched her today on Tim with Two Faces, and she clearly came across strong, stronger than Tim might have wanted, in spite of the fact that he was there to demote Barack by promoting a fierce and coherent, if not a soundly choreographed, Hillary.
The skirmishs she had with Tim today at times were energetic, but it always seemed to end up with Hillary easily leading in the dance, and Tim stone-faced and compliant, all too willing to cave to Hillary's gilded interruptions. It all seemed predicated to have Hillary as tough and then caring and now tough and caring.
You have to hand it to her.
Watching it this morning, I spoke thus, but was quickly attacked by all females in the room, who now seem to be almost fervent in their adoration of Hillary. I can tell you they were completely unable to listen to the slightest iota of negativity regarding Hillary.
I think we may have all miscalculated on the single "woman" factor, and the women in America now see poised to vent the sum total of all ''woman" resentment against the Great White Authoritarian image. Hillary has, whether through the front or the side door, commandeered a direct tap into that ocean.
Those Clintons are superb tacticians, and Hillary is flawless in their implementation.
I still read her emotional piphany as congruently expressed. But now I think she tapped into herself with an admirably cold and nerveless acumen, paying perfect attention to the timeliness of it all. Amazing. I hope it is attributable to a skillful multi-tasking and not a serpentine sociopathic suspension.